GROUNDS FOR REJECTION Sample Clauses

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject— (A) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that-- (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Also, under authority granted to the Commission by Section 252(e)(3) of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, this Amendment has been reviewed for consistency with the requirements of the Illinois Public Utilities Act, 220 ILCS 5, and regulations, rules and orders adopted pursuant thereof. I APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 252(e)

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. Projects shall not be approved when: 15.1. There are reasons to doubt the truthfulness of the documents submitted. 15.2. It is verified that some documents and requirements submitted do not meet the provisions of this Manual. 15.3. The applicant producer or project falls into any of the circumstances provided for in Article 10 of this Manual. 15.4. The CPFC considers that the project is not consistent with the purposes established in Law 1556 of 2012 (promotion of the national territory for filming; promotion of the tourist activity, the country’s image, and the development of the national film industry).

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject -- (A) an agreement (or any portion thereof) adopted by negotiation if it finds that -- (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; . . . Accordingly, the Board may not reject the proposed Resale Agreement in whole or in part unless it finds that the agreement or any material portion thereof discriminates against a non-party carrier or is inconsistent with the public interest. The Board may also establish and enforce other requirements of State law in its review of the agreement under Section 252(e)(3). The federal Act also mandates that the State commission make available to the public each agreement approved by it. Id. at § 252(h). Finally, Section 252(i) of the Act requires that the LEC, Bell Atlantic, make available "any interconnection, service, or network element provided under an agreement approved under this section to which it is a party to any other requesting telecommunications carrier upon the same terms and conditions as those provided in the agreement." This provision helps ensure that the LEC will not agree to terms and conditions that are discriminatory. As the Board found in Docket 5905, Section 252(e)(1) of this Act requires that the Board "approve or reject the agreement with written findings as to any deficiencies." Thus, the Board cannot condition approval. Instead, the Board must either approve the agreement or reject it, specifying the changes the parties must make to render the agreement approvable. Based upon the record in this proceeding, I hereby report the following findings of fact in accordance with the provisions of 30 V.S.A. § 8.

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. PROXIMUS may reject the subscription application or refuse access to foreign networks or to certain additional services and options such as call forwarding, for one of the following reasons: - the Customer refuses to be subject to the terms and conditions set out in Article 1.2; - the Customer has failed to honor the obligations incumbent upon him/her under another contract concluded with PROXIMUS ; - in case of proven fraud or non-payment on the part of the Customer; - the Customer provides a false or erroneous identity.

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. All proposals may be rejected whenever the determination is made that the proposals received are not really competitive, when the cost is not reasonable, or when the cost exceeds the amount expected. Additionally, a proposal may be rejected if: • It is received after the due date and time for submittal. • The cost submittal is unsigned. • Duplicative staff from other current fire debris removal projects are proposed for primary staff positions within the Proposer’s team. • The proposal cost is not prepared as required by the RFP. • The Proposer has been prohibited from contracting with the County. • The Proposer has received a negative contract performance evaluation from the County in the past. • Any items required by the RFP are not included with the submittal. No proposal may be rejected arbitrarily or without reasonable cause.

GROUNDS FOR REJECTION. The State commission may only reject ‑‑ (A) An agreement (or portion thereof) adopted by negotiation under subsection (a) if it finds that ‑‑ (i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; . (1) whether the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) whether or, not the implementation of such agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Further, any party contending that a negotiated agreement is either discriminatory or contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity has the burden of proving such. IV. In the instant matter, the Agreement between BellSouth and SECT provides inter alia for the interconnection of BellSouth's network and SBCT's network, the unbundling of specific network elements offered by BellSouth and the resale of BellSouth's telecommunications services to SECT. V. Because all rates set forth in the Agreement have been agreed to between SECT and BellSouth, they have requested a waiver of Section VIII of the Commission's Procedures Applicable to Negotiations, Mediation, Arbitration, Review of Agreements and Review of Statements of Generally Available Terms Pursuant to Section 252 of TA96 which requires parties filing negotiated agreements to file cost studies to support the agreements. Such request is reasonable, and the requested waiver is hereby granted. VI. Upon a review of the Agreement, the Commission finds that the Agreement meet the standards set forth in Section 252 (e) for approval by this Commission. The Agreement does not discriminate in any manner against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement nor has any telecommunications carrier made such a claim. The Agreement simply sets forth the terms and conditions of the business relationship between BellSouth and SBCT. Those terms and conditions, on their face, do not address any other' telecommunications carrier and this Commission's review has not revealed any discriminatory intent or result inherent in those terms and conditions.