Disputes and Appeals. (1) If the Company disputes an action, finding, or decision of FCIC under this Agreement, the Company shall seek a final administrative decision regarding such action, finding, or decision in accordance with the provisions of 7 C.F.R. § 400.169 before seeking judicial review.
Disputes and Appeals. The Prime Recipient is required to resolve all disputes in accordance with the procedures set forth in 10 C.F.R. § 600.22.
Disputes and Appeals. Effective Date: 06/18/2012 2 CFR 700.15 and the ADS 303mab, Standard Provision for Non-U.S. Nongovernmental Organizations “Disputes and Appeals” establishes that the AO decides any dispute between the recipient as defined in 2 CFR 200, and USAID arising under the assistance award. The AO’s decision is final unless the recipient appeals the decision as outlined below.
Disputes and Appeals. 11.1 This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the United States and the State of Virginia, without regard to conflict of law principles. The Parties waive trial by jury, and agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction and venue of a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Virginia, County of Fairfax. In the event litigation results from or arises out of this Agreement, the losing party shall reimburse the prevailing party with reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and other associated expenses, in addition to any relief to which the prevailing party may be entitled.
Disputes and Appeals. The Prime Recipient is required to resolve all disputes in accordance with the procedures set forth in 2 C.F.R. § 200.341. CLAUSE 20. CONFERENCE SPENDING The Prime Recipient shall not use any Federal funds to: Defray the cost to the United States Government of a conference held by any Executive branch department, agency, board, commission, or office which is not directly and programmatically related to the purpose for which its ARPA-E Award is made and for which the cost to the United States Government is more than $20,000; or To circumvent the required notification by the head of any such Executive Branch department, agency, board, commission, or office to the Inspector General (or senior ethics official for any entity without an Inspector General), of the date, location, and number of employees attending such a conference.
Disputes and Appeals. BCS administers the operation of the National Team and related programs and is responsible for the day- to-day requirements of BCS teams, coaches, team managers and support staff. With respect to those operations:
Disputes and Appeals. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this Agreement shall be identified to the designated grants administrator for the Area Agency. In accordance with Lead Regional Organization (LRO) policy, a written decision shall be promptly furnished to the designated grants administrator for the County. The decision of the LRO is final unless within twenty (20) days of receipt of such decision the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners furnishes a written request for appeal to the Director of the North Carolina Division of Aging and Adult Services, with a copy sent to the Area Agency. The request for appeal shall state the exact nature of the complaint. The Division of Aging and Adult Services will inform the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of its appeal procedures and will inform the Area Agency that an appeal has been filed. Procedures thereafter will be determined by the appeals process of the Division of Aging and Adult Services. The state agency address is as follows: Director North Carolina Division of Aging and Adult Services 2101 Mail Service Center 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxx Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-2101
Disputes and Appeals. 1. The Company may appeal any actions, finding, or decision of FCIC under this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of 7 C.F.R. 400.169.
Disputes and Appeals. Disputes regarding tuition reimbursement shall be settled by the Committee on Tuition Reimbursement and are not grievable. The Committee shall consist of two (2) members of the unit designated by the unit and two (2) management employees designated by the District Division of Human Resources.
Disputes and Appeals. A DHP is not a payment of HB or UC and therefore it is not subject to the statutory appeals mechanism. If there is a disagreement with the decision this must be notified within one calendar month of the date of the decision letter. This must be made in writing and clearly set out the reasons for the disagreement and provide any additional information which needs to be considered. Any appeal will be considered by a different officer from within the service who made the original decision. The outcome of the appeal will be notified in writing providing details as set out in section 12. There is no further right of internal appeal should the revised decision be disagreed with. The only further redress against a decision to refuse an award is by way of Judicial Review in the high Court. The independent Tribunal Service cannot hear appeals relating to DHP.
