Question of Fact definition

Question of Fact means a factual dispute between the complainant and the respondent concerning an issue that is material to a determination as to whether a violation of the Code of Conduct (Article I) exists.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3

Examples of Question of Fact in a sentence

  • APPEALS Grounds for Appeal The complainant or respondent may appeal the final determination of a complaint only on the following grounds: Question of Fact: there is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was present to the Investigating Officer, would result in a different determination.

  • APPEALS Grounds for AppealThe complainant or respondent may appeal the final determination of a complaint only on the following grounds: Question of Fact: there is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was present to the Investigating Officer, would result in a different determination.

  • Horne, “From a Question of Fact to An Absolute Rule” (2011) Employment Law Journal 2.

  • APPEALS 41UPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY  Grounds for Appeal The complainant or respondent may appeal the final determination of a complaint only on the following grounds: Question of Fact: there is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was present to the Investigating Officer, would result in a different determination.

  • The Meaning of ―Supermarket‖ in the Context of this Case is a Question of Fact for the Jury Finally, the Superior Court, relying on several cases discussing the meaning of ―supermarket‖ that Tutu had cited in its 2010 supplemental brief,9 found that K-Mart did not operate a supermarket.

  • APPEALS  Grounds for Appeal The complainant or respondent may appeal the final determination of a complaint only on the following grounds: Question of Fact: there is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was present to the Investigating Officer, would result in a different determination.

  • APPEALS Grounds for Appeal The complainant or respondent may appeal the final determination of a complaint only on the following grounds: 47UPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY Question of Fact: there is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was present to the Investigating Officer, would result in a different determination.

  • Parties can appeal on the following grounds: 8.1.01 Question of Fact Appeals will be considered on “questions of fact” by the introduction of new information that would significantly affect the outcome of the case.

  • Question of Fact as to Whether Plaintiff OverpaidDefendant asserts that the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that plaintiff had overpaid its water and sewer debt charges.

  • If software was not treated as a good under the CISG, then a large segment of international trade would be without a uniform body of contract law.

Related to Question of Fact

  • the 1988 Act means the Local Government Finance Act 1988.

  • the Authority means a billing authority in relation to whose area this scheme has effect by virtue of paragraph 4(6) of Schedule 1A to the 1992 Act;

  • the 1983 Act means the Representation of the People Act 1983;

  • the 1992 Act means the Local Government Finance Act 1992;

  • the 1989 Act means the Local Government and Housing Act 1989;

  • the 1961 Act means the Land Compensation Act 1961(d); “the 1965 Act” means the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965(e); “the 1980 Act” means the Highways Act 1980(f);

  • Request for Information shall have the meaning set out in FOIA or the Environmental Information Regulations as relevant (where the meaning set out for the term “request” shall apply).

  • This law or "the law" means the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Law embraced in

  • the 1981 Act which means the Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981.

  • Request for Information (RFI means a written request by Contractor directed to A/E or ODR for a clarification of the information provided in the Contract Documents or for direction concerning information necessary to perform the Work that may be omitted from the Contract Documents.

  • the 1985 Act means the Companies Act 1985;

  • Street or highway means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.

  • the 1965 Act means the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965(2);

  • the 1998 Act (“Deddf 1998”) means the Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998;

  • the 1980 Act means the Highways Act 1980(3);

  • Ladies and Gentlemen We have acted as counsel Morgan Stanley S&P 500 Xxxxxx Xxxx ("S&P Select"), and Morgan Stanley S&P 500 Xxxxx Fxxx ("X&P Index") in connection with the proposed transfer of substantially all of the assets of S&P Select to S&P Index and certain other transactions related thereto pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Reorganization Agreement (the "Reorganization"). You have requested that we provide an opinion regarding the treatment of the Reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and the accuracy of the tax disclosures in the proxy statement and prospectus (the "Proxy Statement/Prospectus") on Exhibit 12 to the Form N-14 Registration Statement. In connection with rendering these opinions, we have examined originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of (i) the Reorganization Agreement, (ii) the Registration Statement on Form N-14 for the Reorganization, and the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and other documents, exhibits, attachments and schedules contained therein, (iii) written representations of Morgan Stanley Investmexx Xxxixxxx Xxc ("the "Advisor") concerning certain facts underlying and relating to the Reorganization set forth in a letter dated February 26, 2002, and (iv) such other documents and materials as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of the opinions set forth below. In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of all natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies, and the authenticity of the originals of such copies. We have not made an independent investigation of the facts set forth either in the Registration Statement, the Reorganization Agreement or such other documents that we have examined. We have consequently assumed in rendering these opinions that the information presented in such documents or otherwise furnished to us accurately and completely describes in all material respects all facts relevant to the Reorganization. We have also assumed for purposes of rendering our opinions (i) the accuracy of, and material compliance with, the representations of the Advisor set forth in the letter referred to above, (ii) the accuracy of, and material compliance with, the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of S&P Select and S&P Index made in the Reorganization Agreement, and (iii) that there are no agreements or understandings other than those of which we have been informed that would affect our conclusions set forth below. The opinions set forth below are based on the Code, the legislative history with respect thereto, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and published rulings, court decisions and administrative authorities issued with respect to all of the foregoing, all as in effect and existing on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, there can be no assurance that positions contrary to those stated in our opinions may not be asserted by the Internal Revenue Service. Any change occurring after the date hereof in, or a variation from, any of the foregoing factual or legal bases for our opinions could affect the conclusions set forth below. In addition, the opinions expressed herein are given as of the date hereof and we express no obligation to advise you of any changes in the law or events that may hereafter come to our attention that could affect our opinions set forth below. Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinions that, for federal income tax purposes:

  • the 1984 Act means the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984;

  • Requests for Information means a request for information or an apparent request under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information, FOIA or the Environmental Information Regulations;

  • the 1999 Act means the Greater London Authority Act 1999;

  • Fire Code means Ontario Regulation 213/07, as amended, and any successor regulation.

  • the SSCBA means the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992;

  • and Gentlemen We are acting as special counsel with respect to New York tax matters for the unit investment trust or trusts included in the series identified as FT 3368 (each, a "Trust"), which will be established under a certain Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust dated December 9, 2003, and a related Trust Agreement dated as of today (collectively, the "Indenture") among First Trust Portfolios L.P., as Depositor (the "Depositor"), First Trust Advisors L.P., as Evaluator, First Trust Advisors L.P., as Portfolio Supervisor, FTP Services LLC, as FTPS Unit Servicing Agent, and The Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee (the "Trustee"). Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, units of fractional undivided interest in the Trust (the "Units") will be issued in the aggregate number set forth in the Indenture. We have examined and are familiar with originals or certified copies, or copies otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such documents as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the purpose of this opinion. In giving this opinion, we have relied upon the two opinions, each dated today and addressed to the Trustee, of Chapman and Cutler XXX, xounsex xxx the Depositor, with respect to the factual assumptions and the matters of law set forth therein. We have assumed that the assets of the Trust will consist exclusively of debt securities, equity securities in entities classified as corporations for federal income tax purposes, or a combination thereof. Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Trust will not constitute an association taxable as a corporation under the relevant tax laws of the State and City of New York, and accordingly will not be subject to the New York State franchise tax (New York State Consolidated Laws Chapter 60, Article 9-A) or the New York City general corporation tax (New York Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 6, Subchapter 2). We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement (No. 333-178965) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units and to the references to our name in such Registration Statement and the preliminary prospectus included therein. Very truly yours, CARTER LEDYARD & MXXXXXX XXX

  • Interpretation Act means the Interpretation Act (British Columbia) from time to time in force and all amendments thereto and includes all regulations and amendments thereto made pursuant to that Act;

  • the 1991 Act means the Water Industry Act 1991(a);

  • the 1993 Act means the Pension Schemes Act 1993; “the 1995 Act” means the Pensions Act 1995;

  • the 1977 Act means the National Health Service Act 1977;