Demography Clause Samples
Demography. 1. The Parties acknowledge that demographic growth and demographic shifts can have a significant impact on development gains and economic progress, and shall work together towards an integrated approach that minimises the challenges and maximises the benefits of the demographic dividend. To that end, they shall aim to establish, support, maintain and sustain structural reforms and transformations in economic and social systems to create decent education, employment and livelihood opportunities for an emerging young population.
2. The Parties shall support inclusive policy dialogue processes and incorporate demographic trends and projections into all policies in order to empower and promote the full and active participation of children and young people in society, and to empower and safeguard the needs of the elderly and enable their active engagement.
3. The Parties shall enhance urbanisation that is inclusive and sustainable, through effective urban governance and planning, with a view to minimising any adverse impact on the environment and addressing any other negative social and economic consequences caused by rapid population growth in urban areas. They shall work to effectively address the challenges and opportunities presented by rapid urbanisation, including through national urban policies, participatory integrated urban planning, municipal service delivery including waste management, and financing of urban development and infrastructures, in order to create resilient and liveable cities and towns.
Demography. 1. The Parties acknowledge the need to manage the opportunities and challenges of demographic change, in order to better meet the aspirations and hopes of future generations in Africa and the EU.
2. The Parties shall ensure the systematic collection, analysis, storage and dissemination of statistics and data on all the population in accordance with ethical, confidentiality and privacy standards and shall take data and trends into account in their development plans.
3. The Parties shall empower and invest in youth and women, acknowledging their critical role in demographic processes. They shall promote the human rights of women and youth and shall provide them with the education and skills they need. They shall mobilise investment and unlock economic opportunities, so as to harness the potential of large youth populations.
Demography. The population of Caithness in 2018 was 25,413, with a slightly higher proportion of over 65- year-olds compared to the Highland Council area. Table SC13 demonstrates that if current trends continue, the total population is projected to decrease by 21% by 2041, with a much larger reduction seen in children and adults of working age. Older people will increasingly make up greater proportions of the population and the number of people aged over 85 years of age is projected to more than double by 2041. 00-14 4,028 2,719 -32.5 -9.8 15-34 5,481 3,621 -33.9 -9.9 35-64 10,475 7,123 -32.0 -10.7 65-74 3,253 2,759 -15.2 8.0 75-84 1,937 2,807 44.9 74.8 85+ 633 1,340 111.7 140.6 total 25,807 20,367 -21.1 1.4 In 30 years, it is projected that the ratio of people of working age to those aged over 65 years will have significantly reduced. In 2018 there were 26 people of working age for every 10 people aged 65 years or older living in Caithness. By 2041 this figure will have reached a low of 15 people of working age for every 10 people aged 65 years and older. The demand for services in the area will need to be met by a declining and ageing workforce in the future.
Demography. The total population living in the programme area is 2,789,049 inhabitants8. Rather precise and therefore by definition inaccurate, but OK. Population Population density (population/km2) Polog region 313,110 126.3 Skopje region 597,914 328.9 Northeastern region 174,415 75.6 East Economic Region 356,721 154.4 South Economic Region 454,383 226.4 Central Economic Region (adjacent area) 892,506 402.2 2,048,619 2,180,686 1,085,439 1,703,610 Total MK Total Cross- Total Kosovo Cross-border border area area Due to the fact that both capitals Pristina and Skopje are included in the programme area, the population counts for almost 78% of the total population in Kosovo and 53% in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 450 402 329 200 226 126 154 80 76 The programme area is characterized by a low urbanisation level and a predominantly rural population. In the eligible regions of Kosovo, 63% of the population is classified as rural. In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, almost 70% of the population in the Polog region and 44% in the North East region were reported to live in rural areas9. The population density in the Skopje region 8 Source: Republic of Macedonia, State Statistical Office and Statistical Agency of Kosovo (estimation 2008)
Demography. The total population living in the programme area is 2,789,049 inhabitants8. Population Population density (population/km2) Polog region 313,110 126.3 Skopje region 597,914 328.9 Northeastern region 174,415 75.6 East Economic Region 356,721 154.4 South Economic Region 454,383 226.4 Central Economic Region (adjacent area) 892,506 402.2 2,048,619 2,180,686 1,703,610 1,085,439 Total MK Total Cross- Total Kosovo Cross-border border area area Due to the fact that both capitals Pristina and Skopje are included in the programme area, the population counts for almost 78% of the total population in Kosovo and 53% in the Republic of Macedonia. 450 402 400 329 200 226 126 154 80 76 The programme area is characterized by a low urbanisation level and a predominantly rural population. In the eligible regions of Kosovo, 63% of the population is classified as rural. In the Republic of Macedonia, almost 70% of the population in the Polog region and 44% in the North East region were reported to live in rural areas9. The population density in the Skopje region and in the Central Region (Pristina) is 8 Source: Republic of Macedonia, State Statistical Office (estimation 2008) and Statistical Agency of Kosovo 9 Source: Republic of Macedonia, State Statistical Office (population census 2002) and Statistical Agency of Kosovo. Density is calculated according to the data provided by State Statistical Offices much higher compared with the other regions. However, besides the capital cities, there are several dynamic and growing towns on both sides of the border (Tetovo, Gostivar and Kumanovo in the Republic of Macedonia; Gjilane, Prizren, Ferizaj in Kosovo). In Kosovo, the population living in rural areas has a relatively young age structure, with children (under 14 years old) accounting for nearly 1/3 of the total rural population (31%), and the youth group (15-29 years old) composing 28% of the total rural population. In the Republic of Macedonia, the Polog region has a relatively similar structure with 31% of its population under the age of twenty. The situation in the other regions is closer to the national average (25.6%). The Skopje and Polog regions also account for more than 60% of the total natural population increase in the country. Internal and external migratory movements have had a significant impact on the demographic structure of the programme area. Several municipalities on the Kosovan side (especially Pristina, Prizren, Gjilan) report a significant increase of their ...
Demography. The final results of the 2014 Census indicate that on 16 May, about 356,641 inhabitants lived in the Province of Bengo, of which 177,949 were male and 178,692 were female. The Municipality of Dande is the most populous, concentrating around 62% of the total population of the Province. Next are the Municipalities of Nambuangongo (60,883 inhabitants), Dembos-Quibaxe (30,058 inhabitants), Ambriz (22,712 inhabitants), Bula-Atumba (13,454 inhabitants) and Pango Aluquem (7,006), as can be seen in the following figure (see Figure 2).
Demography. Date from the draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) of the municipality of Quezon which based from the 2007 Census, the total population of the municipality in year 2007 reached 51,234 individuals distributed in 10,405 households which indicates 4.92 as an average household size, as shown in the table below: Table 1. 2007 population vs 2012 PCCCDRAP Count Recent unofficial data but based on the actual count done during the PCCDR assessment from April to October 2012 revealed a significant change in the population figures, as presented in the same table above which shows 18% population increase over a period of 5 years or 3.7% increase per annum which is higher than the national average of 2.3% per annum.
Demography. In general, aging of population and concentration of population in urban and coastal areas as main labour centres are the main charac- teristics of the eligible area. In terms of demographic trends there are differences between Croatian and Montenegrin part of the ▇▇▇- gible area. According to last Census (2003), number of inhabitants in Montenegrin part increased for 15% compared to situation in 1991 while in Dubrovnik-Neretva County the population decreased by 1,4% (making comparison between two censuses 1991-2001, see Annex III, Table 2.2). In that terms Dubrovnik-Neretva County follows the present trend of depopulation in Croatia but the rate of depopulation in the co- unty is still lower than for the whole Croatia. In adjacent regions of the both countries the situation in terms of population change more-or-less follows the pattern of their parts of the eligible area. In Dubrovnik-Neretva County natural growth is not as significant as in Montenegrins municipalities and in last few years it slightly varies from decline to growth. In addition to natural decline (or very low natural growth) registered in last couple of year (see Annex III, Table 2.3), in Dubrovnik Neretva County, mainly due to the con- sequences of the war, there are parts of municipalities and cities that are practically abandoned. The consequences of the Homeland war speeded up negative demographic processes in some parts of the County (e.g. in the areas bordering Bosnia and Herzegovina) especially in the eastern part of the hinterland and on some islands (aging population). In both countries demographic processes reflect mostly differences in development of their areas.
Demography. Demographic data and the trend of population aging must be present in the formulation of economic promotion and employment programmes. On the one hand, a moderate population growth of 2.42% since 2000, accompanied by sustained and intense population aging, marked by a percentage of people older than 65 of 20.66%. Moreover, the presence of immigrants is still fairly limited compared to the national context, making it possible, however, to offset the loss of population for vegetative reasons. However, it is necessary to plan with foresight the needs for integration and respect of the immigrant population, to ensure social cohesion in the future. Labour market As regards the labour market, this has shown continued, sustained growth in Gijón in recent years, reaching an increase in employment of 17% since the year 2000. Nevertheless, we still have much to achieve both with respect to activity and occupation rates, especially among women and young people, as also in everything concerning quality of employment, despite the temporary drop in employment of more than
Demography. 2.1 Doncaster is the largest Metropolitan Borough by geographical area in the country. It embraces a diverse community with Doncaster itself, smaller townships, several villages and rural areas. With the demise of traditional industries, the borough experienced considerable social and economic decline, with high unemployment. It is ranked as one of the most deprived areas in the UK and in 2015-16; 52% of students aged 16-19 studying at Doncaster College had disadvantage uplift.
2.2 The measures and activities in this access agreement are designed to improve participation and will also help to raise aspiration and breakdown the traditional barriers to progression to be found in the area.