Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities Sample Clauses

Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. ‌ The FOREST Project’s Applied Forestry Research Component supports research activities as needed in the four technical components and focused on developing baseline maps showing carbon stocks as an overall indicator of the FOREST Project. The extent to which critical carbon sinks in the RFE and Siberia are conserved and sustained is an important objective of FOREST. During Years One and Two, a collaborative research network was developed for measuring changes in greenhouse gas emissions⎯mainly carbon dioxide (CO2)⎯and changes in carbon stocks in the Russia FOREST Project area. The team worked with partner organizations to complement carbon monitoring methodologies and to obtain a clear picture of the impact of various activities on carbon stocks in the project area. The Carbon Working Group used remotely sensed data and data from permanent sample plots to generate carbon vegetation maps of the project areas. Russian Partners Collaborating research institutions include the Sukachev Institute of Forest, Krasnoyarsk; the Far Eastern Forestry Research Institute, Khabarovsk; the Far Eastern Economics Research Institute, Khabarovsk; the Far Eastern Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk; the Pacific Institute of Geography, Far Eastern Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok; the Saint Petersburg Forest Ecological Center; and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Department of Science and Information Systems under the Ministry of Natural Resources; Department of Forestland Management and Rehabilitation under the Ministry for Natural Resources.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. According to official estimates, eight out of ten fires in the Russian Far East (RFE) and Siberia are caused by people. The FOREST Project is working to change behaviors and attitudes of people in the Russian Far East and Siberia to reduce the incidence of human-caused forest fires through a combination of targeted training and general awareness activities. The goal of this component is to reduce the number of human-caused fires in the five regions covered by the project. The Fire Prevention component has had marked success in Years One and Two and its innovative approach has been recognized by many as a valuable addition to the forest fire prevention program in Russia. Changing behaviors is a complex process which takes time. The Forest Fire Prevention team draws upon communications research and practical experience from throughout the world as well as audience research and strategic communication planning to develop a systematic approach to behavioral change. XXXXXX works to involve and mobilize professional foresters and as many influential groups as possible in the five target areas, developing communication programs and advocates of forest fire prevention. These groups—forest services, mass media, schools, NGOs, associations, private sector organizations, community leaders, and others—will continue to be advocates long after the FOREST Project is finished and will create a multiplier effect, training and encouraging others in forest fire prevention behavior, thus sustaining the forest fire prevention program over the long term. Basic materials for mass media, forester training in communications, educating school aged children, and targeted groups campaigns have been prepared and distributed through more than 750 individuals and groups. In summary, the role of FOREST is to be a catalyst and facilitator to get others to promote forest fire prevention.
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. ‌ The FOREST Project is introducing an integrated pest monitoring methodology to track forest insect pest populations to increase the ability of the Ministry of Natural Resources to prevent pest outbreaks. The implementation of the new pest monitoring methodology in the Russian Far East is extremely important not only for saving Russian forests, but, also for protecting forests outside of Russia as well. In the light of past experience with the Asian gypsy moth being introduced into the U.S. via grain ships arriving from several ports in the Russian Far East, it is in the best interest of the U.S. economy to monitor for incipient outbreaks of the Siberian moth and resultant activity by wood boring insects in the Primorski and Khabarovski Krais. Accordingly, the Primorski and Khabarovski Krai Centers for Forest Protection and the FOREST Project initiated monitoring in that area in Year Two. The methodology focuses on monitoring habitat preferred by the Siberian moth within the vast territories of Siberia and the Russian Far East. The methodology also uses geographic information system technology, and contemporary sampling methods such as pheromone traps. The approach has been proven in other countries to be a more cost effective and reliable system for tracking outbreaks of moths and beetles than traditional survey techniques.
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. ‌ A significant amount of Russia’s timber products are exported in a raw form. This not only promotes increased harvesting, but it also hurts the Russian economy. Jobs are lost to companies in other countries that process and sell Russia’s raw materials. Siberia and the Russia Far East have the potential of increasing employment and earnings through increasing value-added processing and sustainable forest management. This component works through associations and assists the businesses to add value to their products. FOREST can reach a greater number of beneficiaries by working with wood and non- timber forest products associations rather than working with individual companies. Associations ensure sustainability as they represent a practical depository for skills, knowledge, and linkages. This component has a three-tiered approach: • Strengthen associations • Strengthen association member businesses • Provide information and assistance that can benefit the entire sector
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. ‌ The FOREST Project works with krai and oblast administrations and beneficiaries to adjust existing policies that pose obstacles to the four technical components. XXXXXX is not reviewing general forest policy, but is strengthening groups to advocate to change policy and to bring policy makers together to review policies that hurt the current economy and environment as it relate to FOREST.
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. The grant component supports the four technical components of the FOREST Project by funding Russian organizations, institutions, and non-governmental organizations for specific activities that will help to achieve the project’s goals. Preparation for the grants component was started in Year One, and two grant cycles have been completed during Year Two. The third and fourth grant awarding cycles have been proposed for Year Three.
Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities. ‌ The FOREST Project uses expert consultants who volunteer their time to work on specific short- term assignments. Use of volunteer experts has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective way to bring focused technical expertise to achieve results. Volunteers contribute significantly while in country, and many maintain relationships with the partner organizations once they return to their home countries. These consultants offer the opportunity to promote exchanges and long-term relationships between Russian and American businesses and organizations. The volunteer component is demand driven and based on the needs that component coordinators, working group members, and partner organizations identified. This is particularly useful for unanticipated problems that arise and that could be best solved by an expert with specific qualifications. The assistance provided by volunteer-experts is a considerable, potential and economic resource. Realization of this resource depends on a number of requirements: • Accurate identification of the problem • The development of a realistic and doable task • Getting a perfect match of the volunteer’s expertise and skills • A clear understanding of the task by the volunteer • The Host to be open to Volunteer’s recommendations and innovations The volunteers assist in finding effective solutions over the problems and help to develop long- term relations between Russian and US businesses and organizations.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Background and Proposed Approach and Priorities

  • Background and Security Investigations 8.1 For the safety and welfare of the children to be served under this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall, as permitted by law, ensure that its staff, employees, independent contractors, volunteers or subcontractors who may come in contact with children in the course of their work, undergo and pass a background investigation to the satisfaction of COUNTY as a condition of beginning and continuing to work under this contract. Such background investigation may include, but shall not be limited to criminal conviction information obtained through fingerprints submitted to the California Department of Justice. The fees associated with the background investigation shall be at the expense of the CONTRACTOR, regardless if the member of CONTRACTOR’s staff passes or fails the backgrounds investigation.

  • BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION The Federal-aid Highway Program (FAHP) is a federally-assisted program of State-selected projects. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the State Departments of Transportation have long worked as partners to deliver the FAHP in accordance with Federal requirements. In enacting 23 U.S.C. 106(c), as amended, Congress recognized the need to give the States more authority to carry out project responsibilities traditionally handled by FHWA. Congress also recognized the importance of a risk-based approach to FHWA oversight of the FAHP, establishing requirements in 23 U.S.C. 106(g). This Stewardship and Oversight (S&O) Agreement sets forth the agreement between the FHWA and the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) on the roles and responsibilities of the FHWA and the State DOT with respect to Title 23 project approvals and related responsibilities, and FAHP oversight activities. The scope of FHWA responsibilities, and the legal authority for State DOT assumption of FHWA responsibilities, developed over time. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation delegated responsibility to the Administrator of the FHWA for the FAHP under Title 23 of the United States Code, and associated laws. (49 CFR 1.84 and 1.85) The following legislation further outlines FHWA’s responsibilities: • Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991; • Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) of 1998; • Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) of 2005; and • Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) of 2012 (P.L. 112-141). The FHWA may not assign or delegate its decision-making authority to a State Department of Transportation unless authorized by law. Xxxxxxx 000 xx Xxxxx 00, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Code (Section 106), authorizes the State to assume specific project approvals. For projects that receive funding under Title 23, U.S.C., and are on the National Highway System (NHS) including projects on the Interstate System, the State may assume the responsibilities of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Title 23 for design, plans, specifications, estimates, contract awards, and inspections with respect to the projects unless the Secretary determines that the assumption is not appropriate. (23 U.S.C. 106(c)(1)) For projects under Title 23, U.S.C. that are not on the NHS, the State shall assume the responsibilities for design, plans, specifications, estimates, contract awards, and inspections unless the State determines that such assumption is not appropriate. (23 U.S.C. 106(c)(2)) For all other project activities which do not fall within the specific project approvals listed in Section 106 or are not otherwise authorized by law, the FHWA may authorize a State DOT to perform work needed to reach the FHWA decision point, or to implement FHWA’s decision. However such decisions themselves are reserved to FHWA. The authority given to the State DOT under Section 106(c)(1) and (2) is limited to specific project approvals listed herein. Nothing listed herein is intended to include assumption of FHWA’s decision-making authority regarding Title 23, U.S.C. eligibility or Federal-aid participation determinations. The FHWA always must make the final eligibility and participation decisions for the Federal-aid Highway Program. Section 106(c)(3) requires FHWA and the State DOT to enter into an agreement relating to the extent to which the State DOT assumes project responsibilities. This Stewardship and Oversight Agreement (S&O Agreement), includes information on specific project approvals and related responsibilities, and provides the requirements for FHWA oversight of the FAHP (Oversight Program), as required by 23 U.S.C. 106(g).

  • Intellectual Property Rights in Construction Documents, Drawings, and Models The drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by the Design Professional pursuant to this Contract (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), are the property of the Owner, whether or not the Project for which they are made commences or completes construction. Neither the Contractor nor any Subcontractor or material or equipment supplier shall own or claim a copyright in such drawings, Specifications, and other similar or related documents; Owner shall retain all common law, statutory, and other intellectual property rights with respect thereto. The Contractor must deliver remaining copies of such documents to the Owner upon request or upon completion of the Work, except that the Contractor may keep one copy of such documents for its files. The Contractor shall only use such drawings, Specifications and other documents for this Project. Neither the Contractor nor any Subcontractor or material or equipment supplier may use such drawings, Specifications, and other documents on other projects without the specific written consent of the Owner. All models are the property of the Owner.

  • Background and Context 1.1 Objectives of this Agreement The purpose of this Agreement is to define, in the context of the resource inputs provided, the targets by which the performance of Forensic Science Ireland (FSI) will be measured in 2021. The ongoing supports that the Department of Justice will provide to FSI in this regard, and the mechanisms for monitoring and appraising performance, form part of the overall governance arrangements between the two parties and as such are set out in the separate but complementary Oversight Agreement 2020-22.

  • Parent Right to Access and Challenge Student Data The LEA shall establish reasonable procedures pursuant to which a parent, as that term is defined in 105 ILCS 10/2(g), may inspect and/or copy Student Data and/or challenge the accuracy, relevance or propriety of Student Data, pursuant to Sections 5 and 7 of ISSRA (105 ILCS 10/5; 105 ILCS 10/7) and Section 33 of SOPPA (105 ILCS 85/33). The Provider shall respond to any request by the LEA for Student Data in the possession of the Provider when Provider cooperation is required to afford a parent an opportunity to inspect and/or copy the Student Data, no later than 5 business days from the date of the request. In the event that a parent contacts the Provider directly to inspect and/or copy Student Data, the Provider shall refer the parent to the LEA, which shall follow the necessary and proper procedures regarding the requested Student Data.

  • Background and Purpose Executive was employed by the Company. Executive's employment is ending effective ____________ under the conditions described in Section 3.1 of the Executive Severance Agreement ("Agreement") by and between Executive and the Company dated ____________, 2012. The purpose of this Release is to settle, and the parties hereby settle, fully and finally, any and all claims the Releasing Parties may have against the Released Parties, whether asserted or not, known or unknown, including, but not limited to, claims arising out of or related to Executive's employment, any claim for reemployment, or any other claims whether asserted or not, known or unknown, past or future, that relate to Executive's employment, reemployment, or application for reemployment.

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The partnership proposed by the Cooperator was selected due to merit review evaluations from the 2017 Notice of Funding Opportunity P17AS00037. The Cooperator demonstrated expertise in disciplines and subject areas of relevance to cooperative research and training. The Cooperator met the program interests of NPS with expertise, facilities, experience, diversity of programs, and history of collaborative research projects. The Cooperator helps the NPS-CESU to meet its objectives to:  Provide research, technical assistance and education to NPS for land management, and research;  Develop a program of research, technical assistance and education that involves the biological, physical, social, and cultural sciences needed to address resources issues and interdisciplinary problem-solving at multiple scales and in an ecosystem context at the local, regional, and national level; and  Place special emphasis on the working collaboration among NPS, universities, and their related partner institutions. Title: Provide research, technical assistance and education for resource management and research The CESU network seeks to provide scientifically-based information on the nature and status of selected biological, physical, and cultural resources occurring within the parks in a form that increases its utility for making management decisions, conducting scientific research, educating the public, developing effective monitoring programs, and developing management strategies for resource protection. Studying the resources present in NPS parks benefits the Cooperator’s goal of advancing knowledge through scientific discovery, integration, application, and teaching, which lead toward a holistic understanding of our environmental and natural resources. The Cooperator is a public research university, sharing research, educational, and technological strengths with other institutions. Through inter-institutional collaboration, combined with the unique contributions of each constituent institution, the Cooperator strives to contribute substantially to the cultural, economic, environmental, scientific, social and technological advancement of the nation. The NPS expects there to be substantial involvement between itself and the Cooperator in carrying out the activities contemplated in this Agreement. The primary purpose of this study is not the acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use by the Federal Government, but rather to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized the Legislative Authorities in ARTICLE II. This agreement fulfills the Public Purpose of support and economic stimulation for the following reasons:  Projects will engage recipients, partners, communities, and/or visitors in shared environmental stewardship.  Projects will promote greater public and private participation in historic preservation programs and activities. The project builds resource stewardship ethics in its participants.  The information, products and/or services identified or developed by projects will be shared through a variety of strategies to increase public awareness, knowledge and support for historic preservation and stewardship of the nation’s cultural and historical heritage.  Projects will support the Government’s objective to provide opportunities for youth to learn about the environment by spending time working on projects in National Parks. The NPS receives the indirect benefit of completing conservation projects.  Projects will motivate youth participants to become involved in the natural, cultural and /or historical resource protection of their communities and beyond.  Students gain “real world” or hands-on experience outside of the classroom of natural, cultural and/or historical resource projects.  The scientific community and/or researchers external to NPS gains by new knowledge provided through research and related results dissemination of natural, cultural and/or historical resource information.  Projects assist in the creation, promotion, facilitation, and/or improvement of the public’s understanding of natural, cultural, historic, recreational and other aspects of areas such as ecological conservation areas, and state and local parks. For performance under this cooperative agreement, the regulations set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, supersedes OMB Circulars A–21 (2 CFR 220), A–87 (2 CFR 225), A–110, and A–122 (2 CFR 230); Circulars A–89, A–102, and A–133; and the guidance in Circular A–50 on Single Audit Act follow–up apply. The Cooperator shall adhere to 2 CFR, Part 200 in its entirety in addition to any terms and conditions of the master agreement not superseded by 2 CFR 200, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the original terms of the master agreement and 2 CFR, Part 200, relating to this task agreement, 2 CFR, Part 200 shall take precedence.

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 9.1 The Institution acknowledges that all copyrights, patent rights, trade marks, database rights, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights relating to the Licensed Material are the sole and exclusive property of Publisher or are duly licensed to the Publisher and that this Licence does not assign or transfer to the Institution any right, title or interest therein except for the right to use the Licensed Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Licence.

  • Background Intellectual Property ‌ Notwithstanding and superseding anything to the contrary in this ARTICLE 14, each Party retains title to all Intellectual Property Rights owned or possessed by it or any of its affiliates prior to or independent of performance of this Agreement and used by it in fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement, as well as any modifications or improvements made thereto in the course of performing this Agreement (“Background IP”). To the extent that one Party acquires any right, title, or interest in and to any aspect of the modifications or improvements to the Background IP of the other Party, such first Party shall assign such right, title, and interest to the second Party, immediately following such acquisition. If any of the Supplier’s Background IP is included in or required to use the Documentation provided by the Supplier to the City, the Supplier hereby grants to the City an irrevocable, perpetual, fully paid-up, royalty-free, worldwide, transferable and non-exclusive licence (including the right to sub-licence only to members of the City’s Group) to, itself and through contractors and agents, use, copy, amend, reproduce, modify, create derivative works of, use, commercialize, and otherwise exploit the Supplier’s Background IP but only to the extent required to use such Documentation for the purpose (or any reasonably inferred purpose) for which it has been provided or for the provision of the Supply under this Agreement (excluding any software source code).

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.