Past Attempts at Watershed Protection Sample Clauses

Past Attempts at Watershed Protection. There have been several projects and studies completed on the subject of how to protect and/or enhance the Grand Lake/Wabash River watershed. These range from studying the avian species of the Grand Lake St Marys area, as Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxx did in 1960 with Birds of the Lake St Marys Area: An Annotated Check List and Migration Dates, to the current efforts undertaken by the GLWWA Watershed Project‘s Joint Board of Supervisors. Several early reports account management techniques that were utilized to ensure the Grand Lake St. Marys was a successful fishery for the sportsmen. These reports focused on techniques such as providing the proper habitat for the fish and other wildlife and the stocking of species within the lake. From there, the 1980‘s would provide the next crucial study, document and actions taken to protect the lake and the citizens who used the lake for recreation. The United States Geological Survey, the US EPA, Army Corps of Engineer‘s, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, and other similar agencies have produced reports, studies, and suggestions on the status of the watershed, how to reduce the degradation occurring, and why it is important to protect the resources of the area. In more recent years, Ohio EPA conducted water quality sampling in the summer of 1999 to provide a more comprehensive look at the quality of the Grand Lake/Wabash watershed. Samples taken from these sites indicate potential locations and sources of the non-point source pollution that has had such an impact on the watershed. The watershed project continues to use this sampling data as a tool when discussing the importance of watershed protection. The watershed project also utilized a consulting firm, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Associates, to complete an inventory of the Grand Lake St. Marys watershed, funded through an ODNR Canal Lakes Grant. The document was completed in 1999 and contains numerous tables, charts, and graphs that present and interprets the findings of the inventory, provides vast amounts of background information on various portions of the study, and also provides a section on findings and recommendations for the watershed. This document has been valuable for the production of this action plan and other documents, funding applications and information materials produced by the watershed project. The document proved to be extremely valuable for the production of the original Grand Lake St. Marys Watershed Management Plan that was endorsed in 2005. The ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Past Attempts at Watershed Protection

  • Meadow Protection Reasonable care shall be taken to avoid damage to the cover, soil, and wa- ter in xxxxxxx shown on Sale Area Map. Vehicular or skidding equipment shall not be used on xxxxxxx, ex- cept where roads, landings, and tractor roads are ap- proved under B5.1 or B6.422. Unless otherwise agreed, trees felled into xxxxxxx shall be removed by endlining. Resulting logging slash shall be removed where neces- sary to protect cover, soil, and water.

  • Protection of Watershed PURCHASER shall take all necessary precautions to prevent damage to stream banks, any stream course, lake, reservoir, or forested wetland within or adjacent to the timber sale area. Definitions of Type F, Type D, and Type N streams contained in the Forest Practices Act apply to this contract. In addition to other protective measures required, PURCHASER shall discontinue all or part of the operations under this contract upon notice from STATE that operations will cause excessive damage to the watershed.

  • Password Protection Contractor agrees that any portable or laptop computer that has access to the Eligible Users or State of Utah networks, or stores any Public Data is equipped with strong and secure password protection.

  • Wetlands Protection Xxxxxxxx requiring protection under Executive Order 11990 are shown on Sale Area Map. Vehicular or skidding equipment shall not be used in such wetlands, except where roads, landings, and tractor roads are approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Additional measures needed to protect such areas are provided in C6.62.

  • Streamcourse Protection “Streamcourses” that are subject to provisions of this Section are shown on Sale Area Map. Unless otherwise agreed, the following measures shall be observed to protect Streamcourses:

  • FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLAND PROTECTION Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26951), 3 C.F.R., 1977 Comp., p. 117, as interpreted in HUD regulations at 24 C.F.R. Part 55, particularly Section 2(a) of the Order (For an explanation of the relationship between the decision- making process in 24 C.F.R. Part 55 and this part, see § 55.10.); and Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26961), 3 C.F.R., 1977 Comp., p. 121 particularly Sections 2 and 5. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. § 1451, et seq.), as amended, particularly sections 307(c) and (d) (16 U.S.C. § 1456(c) and (d)).

  • Whistle Blowing Protection The Employer agrees to adhere to the whistle blowing protection pursuant to the Long-Term Care Homes Act (LTCHA).

  • Reciprocal Compensation Traffic Telecommunications traffic originated by a Customer of one Party on that Party’s network and terminated to a Customer of the other Party on that other Party’s network, except for Telecommunications traffic that is interstate or intrastate Exchange Access, Information Access, or exchange services for Exchange Access or Information Access. The determination of whether Telecommunications traffic is Exchange Access or Information Access shall be based upon Verizon’s local calling areas as defined by Verizon. Reciprocal Compensation Traffic does not include the following traffic (it being understood that certain traffic types will fall into more than one (1) of the categories below that do not constitute Reciprocal Compensation Traffic): (1) any Internet Traffic;

  • Xxxx Protection 23.1With respect to the Parties' rights and obligations under this Framework Agreement, the Parties agree that the Authority is the Data Controller and that the Supplier is the Data Processor.

  • CLEAN AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT Customer Purchase Orders using federal funds must contain a provision that requires the Contractor to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Pursuant to the Federal Rule above, Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387) and will remain in compliance during the term of the Contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.