Intended Outcomes Sample Clauses

Intended Outcomes. 8.2.1 The establishment and implementation of this Intergovernmental Agreement is intended to promote the following outcomes for eligible infants and toddlers and their families: • Families and their eligible children attain functional outcomes that reflect their priorities, routines, relationships, resources, and concerns to assist their children to engage and participate in everyday routines and activities; • Families access comprehensive, coordinated, culturally-appropriate early intervention services as determined by the IFSP team; • Families are actively involved in all aspects of AzEIP implementation; and • Families are knowledgeable about and exercise, as appropriate, their procedural rights and safeguards.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Intended Outcomes. Establish a process to develop and maintain a produce farm inventory. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Coordinate with other local, state, territory, and federal agencies for produce safety activities. • Formulate a multi-year plan to implement a produce safety system. • Develop a performance measurement system, plan and/or process system to measure the progress towards the goals of this cooperative agreement. • Evaluate produce legislative or regulatory authority. • Develop and/or provide education, outreach, and technical assistance to jurisdictional produce safety regulators. • Design and implement a compliance program for produce safety regulations at the jurisdictional level. • Advance efforts for a National Integrated Food Safety System. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Encourage the safe production of fresh fruits and vegetables. • Promote understanding and compliance with the requirements of the Produce Safety Rule. Program Metrics • Current program funding: $30.9M • Current number of awards: 44 State Produce CAP Awardees (FY2017) Connecticut New Hampshire New York Maryland Massachusetts West Virginia Vermont Rhode Island Pennsylvania Maine Delaware New Jersey Indiana Iowa Kansas Michigan Minnesota Ohio Wisconsin Nebraska Alaska Arizona California Colorado Idaho Montana New Mexico Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Alabama Missouri Idaho Florida Tennessee Louisiana Oklahoma Virginia Arkansas Georgia North Carolina South Carolina Texas Have you seen our Blog? FDA Voice
Intended Outcomes. It is agreed that the potential benefits from cooperation among the State departments include the following:
Intended Outcomes. Establish a process to develop and maintain a produce farm inventory. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Coordinate with other local, state, territory, and federal agencies for produce safety activities. • Formulate a multi-year plan to implement a produce safety system. • Develop a performance measurement system, plan and/or process system to measure the progress towards the goals of this cooperative agreement. • Evaluate produce legislative or regulatory authority. • Develop and/or provide education, outreach, and technical assistance to jurisdictional produce safety regulators. • Design and implement a compliance program for produce safety regulations at the jurisdictional level. • Advance efforts for a nationally integrated food safety system. • Plan, establish, and/or enhance state and territory produce safety programs. • Encourage the safe production of fresh fruits and vegetables . • Promote understanding and compliance with the requirements of the Produce Safety Rule. Program Metrics • Current program funding: $27.135M • Current number of awards: 48 State Produce CAP Awardees (FY2020) Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arkansas Arizona California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Wisconsin West Virginia Have you seen our Blog? FDA Voice
Intended Outcomes. Improved screening services for those with increased risk for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. • Decreased rates of prenatal hospitalization and c- section, pre-term delivery, NICU stays, and other complications. • Increased rates of contraception during the inter- conception period, patients breastfeeding, and interpregnancy interval. Programmatic updates: • Continued to leverage transportation cost assistance strategies (e.g., Lyft passes) to help patients keep appointments as scheduled, on time. • Leveraging a risk assessment app to help support patient education. Lessons learned during Quarter 4, 2020: • Networking with other providers, care programs, and service agencies supporting the same population continues to be an important component of working collaboratively across a community to provide wraparound services to our clients.
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will impact on the following BCF metrics: • Percentage of people who are discharged from acute hospital to their usual place of residence: The percentage of Hillingdon residents aged 18 and above discharged to their usual home. The target for 2021/22 is 91%. • Permanent admissions to care homes metric: Reduction in permanent admissions to care homes per 100,000 65 + population. The ceiling for 2022/23 is 776.3. • Still at home 91 days after discharge metric: An increase in the percentage of people aged 65 + still at home 91 days after discharge. The 2022/23 target is 90.5%. Other success measures include: • Daily bed occupancy rate at Hillingdon Hospital: The bed occupancy rate should be at no more than 90%. • Length of stay of seven days or more (Hillingdon Hospital): Percentage of people in hospital with a length of stay of seven days or more (known as ‘stranded patients’) should be no more than 30% of the bed base, i.e., 90 based on 315 core beds. • Out of hospital capacity: Health and social care capacity at no more than 90% utilisation.
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will contribute to the following national BCF metrics: • Admission avoidance metric: Reduction in non-elective admissions of people with ambulatory care sensitive conditions. The ceiling for 2022/23 is 874. • Percentage of people who are discharged from acute hospital to their usual place of residence: The percentage of Hillingdon residents aged 18 and above discharged to their usual home. The target for 2022/23 is 93.2%. • Permanent admissions to care homes metric: Reduction in permanent admissions to care homes per 100,000 65 + population. The ceiling for 2022/23 is 776.3. The following measures will be used to identify whether the scheme is working: • Number of CQC registered care providers that experience business failure. • Reduction in inappropriate non-elective admissions from extra care sheltered housing schemes. • Proportion of people on an end of life pathway on CMC who achieved their preferred place of death.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will impact on the following BCF metrics: • Admission avoidance metric: Reduction in non-elective admissions of people with ambulatory care sensitive conditions. The ceiling for 2022/23 is 874. • Permanent admissions to care homes metric: Reduction in permanent admissions to care homes per 100,000 65 + population. The ceiling for 2022/23 is 776.3. Scheme 7: Integrated Care and Support for Children and Young People
Intended Outcomes. To assist jurisdictions through facilitation of long-term improvements and advancement of the Retail Program Standards.  To help state, local, tribal, and territorial retail food regulatory programs achieve conformance with the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (VNRFRPS). Program Metrics Retail Program Standards Grants, Year 4:  Applications Received: 667  Applications Scored: 519  Grants Awarded: 435  Funding Awarded: $1,962,986 Breakdown of 435 Grants Awarded:  Self Assessments: 88 grants, $220,000  Verification Audits 1 Standard: 21 grants, $42,000  Verification Audits 2 or More Standards: 27 grants, $81,000  Custom: 41 grants, $119,425  Moderate Projects: 56 grants, $966, 942  Training: 182 grants, $488,078  Food Protection Task Force: 20 grants, $45,542 Jurisdictional Level:  Local: 383  State: 49  Tribal: 2  Territorial: 1 FDA Region:  Southeast: 85  Southwest: 131  Northeast: 45  Central: 115  Pacific: 59 Program Accomplishments (first 3 years of funding)  127 self-assessments of all 9 Program Standards  68verification audits of one or more Standards  1143 employees who have received direct training  Jurisdictions used funds to complete Risk Factor Studies, develop & implement electronic inspection systems, enhance inspection and complaint forms, enhance existing software to improve data collection, tracking and reporting, and to develop and implement learning management systems. Have you seen our Blog? FDA Voice
Intended Outcomes. Success Measures This scheme will contribute to the following BCF national metrics:
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.