Extrapolation Sample Clauses

Extrapolation. To predict a future zero crossing, the zero crossing function f must be ex- trapolated. For rst order extrapolation, the following calculation is used:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Extrapolation. With respect to any Lease Year in which the Building or Building Portion A is not 95% occupied, the Operating Costs which vary based on the occupancy of the Building shall, for the purpose of determining Operating Costs, be increased for such period to the amount which would have been incurred had the Building or Building Portion A, as the case may be, been 95% occupied. D.
Extrapolation. Can information from bulk or other nanomaterials be used? 20
Extrapolation. Following an audit, the IMI JU services will indicate in the final report whether the possible errors detected during the audit are of a systemic nature, i.e. if they are such that it is reasonable to assume that they affect not only the IMI grant agreement actually audited, but also other IMI grant agreements where the audited entity participates. If there are errors of systemic nature, the letter of conclusion accompanying the final audit report will require the beneficiaries to apply the findings of the audit and to correct the errors in all IMI JU projects by re-submitting within a given deadline the financial statements of all projects where the audited entity participates. These revised financial statements should take into account the conclusions of the audit. The beneficiary will have the possibility of explaining why the audit findings should not be extrapolated to other IMI grant agreements. Should the beneficiary not react, the IMI JU may suspend all payments owed to this beneficiary until the revised cost statements are submitted, and follow-up audits of the beneficiaries may be carried out by the IMI JU.
Extrapolation. Following an audit, the Commission services will indicate in the final report whether the possible errors detected during the audit are of a systematic nature, i.e. if they are such that it is reasonable to assume that they affect not only the Grant Agreement actually audited, but also other GA where the audited entity participates. If there are errors of systematic nature, the letter of conclusion accompanying the final audit report will require the beneficiaries to apply the findings of the audit and to correct the errors in all FP7 projects by re-submitting within a given deadline the financial statements of all projects where the audited entity participates. These revised financial statements should take into account the conclusions of the audit. The beneficiary will have the possibility of explaining why the audit findings should not be extrapolated to other GA. Should the beneficiary not react, the Commission may suspend all FP7 payments owed to this beneficiary until the revised cost statements are submitted, and follow-up audits of the beneficiaries' GA may be carried out by the Commission. The Commission has adopted in December 2009 a Communication regarding simplification of the recovery process in the framework of the implementation of the audit strategy under the Framework Programmes. The Communication permits the use of flat rate corrections based on the average error rates observed in the audited projects to establish the amounts to be recovered; in that way, the extrapolation exercise can be now performed without examining each non-audited periods of projects or even without re-calculating the sums claimed. The calculation of the actual debt can be made on the basis of one of the following methods: - Method 1: where the audit has identified the existence of a systematic error, the beneficiary shall precisely recalculate the costs affected by the systematic error in each of the non- audited projects/periods and report the corresponding adjustments to the Commission in due form. - Method 2: however, with the aim to simplify extrapolation the beneficiary may choose to adjust the individual cost category (personnel, subcontracting, other costs, indirect costs,.) affected by the systematic error by the application of a flat-rate correction. The flat-rate corresponds to the average of the individual systematic error in a given cost category identified in the audited projects/periods. - Method 3: the beneficiary may also opt to apply an overall fla...
Extrapolation. Follow the procedures found in PIM 3.10 and Exhibits 9-12, as well as MMA Section 935(a), regarding the use of extrapolation.

Related to Extrapolation

  • Linear Interpolation Where Linear Interpolation is specified as applicable in respect of an Interest Period in the applicable Final Terms, the Rate of Interest for such Interest Period shall be calculated by the Agent by straight line linear interpolation by reference to two rates based on the relevant Reference Rate (where Screen Rate Determination is specified as applicable in the applicable Final Terms) or the relevant Floating Rate Option (where ISDA Determination is specified as applicable in the applicable Final Terms), one of which shall be determined as if the Designated Maturity were the period of time for which rates are available next shorter than the length of the relevant Interest Period and the other of which shall be determined as if the Designated Maturity were the period of time for which rates are available next longer than the length of the relevant Interest Period provided however that if there is no rate available for a period of time next shorter or, as the case may be, next longer, then the Agent shall determine such rate at such time and by reference to such sources as it determines appropriate.

  • Points 9.6 The points to be assigned to the classification levels under this Agreement shall be: Award Classification Level Recommended Points C14 - C13 - C12 32 C11 64 C10 96 C9 12 additional points above C10 C8 24 additional points above C10 C7 36 additional points above C10 C6 48 additional points above C10 C5 60 additional points above C10 C4 Standards and points to be finalised C3 Standards and points to be finalised C2a Standards and points to be finalised C2b Standards and points to be finalised C1a Standards and points to be finalised C1b Standards and points to be finalised and in accordance with Table 2 in the National Metal and Engineering Competency Standards Implementation Guide. Mixed functions

  • Shift Differentials A shift differential of thirty-five cents ($.35) per hour shall be paid for shifts starting between 2:00 p.m. and 9:59 p.m. for employees regularly assigned to such shifts. A shift differential of forty-five cents ($.45) per hour shall be paid for shifts starting between 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. for employees regularly assigned to such shifts. The differential provided herein shall be part of base pay for overtime pay and other purposes. Employees at the Maine State Prison who are regularly assigned to the 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. shift are to be paid a shift differential of forty-five cents ($.45) per hour. Employees of mental health and correctional facilities shall be eligible for the second shift differential when their shift begins between 12:00 noon and 4:59 p.m.

  • Overtime Calculation For the purpose of overtime calculation only, approved or scheduled time off work will be considered the same as time worked.

  • Differentials No evening or night differentials will be applicable for a person on flexible scheduling concepts unless some or all of the hours he/she works would have fallen within the differential period of 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. had the person not been on a flexible scheduling concept.

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Multiple Bedroom Spaces If this Housing Agreement expressly identifies more than one bedroom space in a multi-bedroom apartment as assigned to Resident on page 1, then: (a) references to a “space” or “spaces” will be deemed to refer to all of the spaces assigned to Resident, or to the entire apartment if all of the bedrooms in an apartment are assigned to Resident; and (b) if Resident is assigned fewer than all of the bedroom spaces in an apartment, use of common areas will continue to be shared with other residents of the apartment and any calculation of Resident’s share of any charges assessed pro rata to all residents of an apartment will be made by dividing the number of bedroom spaces assigned to Resident by the total number of occupied bedroom spaces within the apartment.

  • TIPS Pricing Vendor agrees and understands that for each TIPS Contract that it holds, Vendor submitted, agreed to, and received TIPS’ approval for specific pricing, discounts, and other pricing terms and incentives which make up Vendor’s TIPS Pricing for that TIPS Contract (“TIPS Pricing”). Vendor confirms that Vendor will not add the TIPS Administration Fee as a charge or line-item in a TIPS Sale. Vendor hereby certifies that Vendor shall only offer goods and services through this TIPS Contract if those goods and services are included in or added to Vendor’s TIPS Pricing and approved by TIPS. TIPS reserves the right to review Vendor’s pricing update requests as specifically as line-item by line-item to determine compliance. However, Vendor contractually agrees that all submitted pricing updates shall be within the original terms of the Vendor’s TIPS Pricing (scope, proposed discounts, price increase limitations, and other pricing terms and incentives originally proposed by Vendor) such that TIPS may accept Vendors price increase requests as submitted without additional vetting at TIPS discretion. Any pricing quoted by Vendor to a TIPS Member or on a TIPS Quote shall never exceed Vendor’s TIPS Pricing for any good or service offered through TIPS. Vendor certifies by signing this agreement that Vendor’s TIPS Pricing for all goods and services included in Vendor’s TIPS Pricing shall either be equal to or less than Vendor’s current pricing for that good or service for any other customer. TIPS Pricing price increases and modifications, if permitted, will be honored according to the terms of the solicitation and Vendor’s proposal, incorporated herein by reference.

  • Calculation Each of the foregoing ratios and financial requirements shall be calculated as of the last day of each Fiscal Quarter.

  • Non-Escalation Unless otherwise specified within the RFP documents, the unit prices reflected on the contract shall remain firm with no provision for price increases during the term of the contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.