Administrative Considerations. All questions concerning BPAs will be directed to the GSA Contracting Officers (contact information identified in section RFQ.5). The GSA Contracting Officer and the Alternate Contracting Officer are the only individuals with the authority to amend BPAs.
Administrative Considerations. The BPA Contracting Officer is the only person authorized to make or approve any changes to the requirements or terms and conditions contained in this BPA. In the event the contractor makes any BPA changes at the direction of any person other than the BPA Contracting Officer, the change will be considered to have been made without authority and no adjustment will be allowed to cover any increase in cost incurred as a result thereof.
Administrative Considerations. A. The Signatories shall attach this Agreement or the measures (stipulations) called for in this Agreement to any Record(s) of Decision (ROD), approved permit(s), or other condition(s) issued for this Undertaking so that this Agreement and its requirements become legally enforceable and binding on those actions.
Administrative Considerations. An error and omission was made by the District’s benefit consultant, Hub International, when preparing benefit plan options considered during bargaining.The deductible level in the Consumer Driven Health Plan (CDHP) with Health Savings Account (HSA) does not meet the required minimum deductible specified by the IRS for calendar year 2019. Because the deductible is embedded, not an aggregate, the IRS deductible threshold is $2,700 for single coverage and $5,400 for single plus dependent coverage. The deductible agreed to in bargaining for the CDHP with HSA was $2,500/$5,000. In order to be compliant with IRS regulations the deductible levels for the CDHP will be increased by $200 for employee single coverage and $400 for employee plus dependents. In addition, the Board contribution to the HSA will be increased by $200 for employee single and $400 for employee plus dependents for those who elect to participate in the CDHP with HSA. Through a contract amendment with a performance guarantee of 20%, Hub, will reimburse the Board the additional HSA contribution amount. BOARD RECOMMENDATION
Administrative Considerations. 15 A. The USACE and BSEE shall attach this PA or the stipulations listed in this legally 16 enforceable PA to any agency-specific permits, licenses, and other approvals that are 17 subject to 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(y) so that appropriate provisions of this PA and its 18 requirements become binding on the Permittee, so long as the underlying PA remains 19 in effect for the area covered by the relevant permits, licenses, and other approvals.
Administrative Considerations. The rent will be the usual $15,000 per room. The lease runs for 12 months. It is not automatically renewable, although the District generally seeks to keep these programs in-District.
Administrative Considerations. 3.1. The agreement must specify the minimum amount of time the PhD student will spend at each University, in order to guarantee effective co-supervision by each Institution.
Administrative Considerations. The suspending administrator must weigh the severity of the offense, the student’s prior disciplinary record, the parental/community support in place for the student and the impact of the offense on the school community when determining whether to offer an abeyance contract to the student and parent/legal guardian. Reviewed: March 24, 2009 Reviewed: September 24, 2010 [Friday Report] – Cross Ref Policy Correction 10-12-10 Cross Ref: JB – Equal Educational Opportunities and Anti-Harassment Policy JI – Rights and Responsibilities JICA – Student Dress JICFA – Hazing JICG – Tobacco Use by Students JICH – Drug and Alcohol Use by Students JICI – Weapons in School JICJ – Use of Cell Phones and Other Electronic Signaling Devices JICL – Bully Prohibition and Prevention JKA – Discipline of, and Alternative Interim Placements for Special Education Students JKAA – Discipline, Suspension, Expulsion for 504 Handicapped Students
Administrative Considerations. Pursuant to 204(b) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, responsible Federal Agency officials may meet or enter into project level MOUs with officials of State, Tribal and local Governments or their designees. During such meetings in this instance, implementation and monitoring of this MOU should note views, information and advice exchanged. Nothing in this MOU will be construed as limiting or affecting in any way the authority or legal responsibility of the parties identified in Attachment 1 and the BLM, or as mandating performance beyond the respective authority of each party, or to require that a party assume or expend any sum in excess of appropriations available. It is understood that all the provisions herein must be within the financial, legal, and personnel limitations of the parties identified in Attachment 1 and the BLM. This MOU is neither a fiscal nor a funds obligation document. Nothing in this MOU will be construed to extend jurisdiction or decision-making authority to BLM for management any non-federally administered lands or resources in the project area (see Attachment 2). Similarly, nothing in this MOU will be construed to extend any jurisdiction or decision-making authority to the parties identified in Attachment 1 for management of land or resource uses on the Federal lands or mineral estates administered by the BLM. All parties identified in Attachment 1 and BLM will work together cooperatively and will communicate about issues of mutual concern.
Administrative Considerations. Where policies of Grantee differ from those of the State, such as travel reimbursement, fringe benefits, indirect costs, etc., the policies of the Grantee shall be applicable to cost incurrences under the Agreement provided such policies comply with awarding agency regulations.
