Cross-reference definition

Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code. The statutory provisions on the FSM Congress are found in title 3 of this code.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code. The statutory provisions on the Congress of the Federated States of Micronesia are found in title 3 of this code. The statutory provisions on the FSM Supreme Court and the Judiciary are found in title 4 of this code. The FSM Supreme Court website contains court decisions, rules, calendar, and other information of the court, the Constitution, the code of the Federated States of Micronesia, and other legal resource information at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the FSM Congress are found in title 3 of this code. The official website of the Congress of the Federated States of Micronesia contains the public laws enacted by the Congress, sessions, committee hearings, rules, and other Congressional information at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xx/.

Examples of Cross-reference in a sentence

  • ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.01 Definitions 1 1.02 Other Definitional Provisions 9 1.03 Cross-Reference of Other Definitions 9 ARTICLE II THE MERGER 2.01.


More Definitions of Cross-reference

Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the Public Auditor are found in chapter 5 of title 55 (Government Finance and Contracts) of this code.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on crimes are found in title 11 of this code. The statutory provisions on Postal Crimes are found in chapter 2 of this title.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code. The statutory provisions on the FSM Supreme Court and the Judiciary are found in title 4 of this code. The FSM Supreme Court website contains court decisions, rules, calendar, and other information of the court, the Constitution, the code of the Federated States of Micronesia, and other legal resource information at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code. The statutory provisions on the FSM Congress are found in title 3 of this code. The statutory provisions on Marine Resources are found in title 24 of this code.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on Public Employment are found in title 52 of this code.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code.
Cross-reference. The statutory provisions on the President and the Executive are found in title 2 of this code. Case annotations: No person shall use any fishing vessel for, and the crew and operator of any fishing vessel shall not engage in, commercial or non-commercial fishing or related activities in the exclusive economic zone unless it is in accordance with a valid and applicable permit. FSM v. Katzutoku Maru, 15 FSM R. 400, 403 (Pon. 2007). When the defendantslocal agent prior to defendants’ fishing activities on August 18th, 19th, and 20th had actual knowledge that XXXXX would not be issuing the fishing permit, the knowledge of the defendants’ agent is imputed to the defendants under the law of agency. FSM v. Katzutoku Maru, 15 FSM R. 400, 404 (Pon. 2007). The Marine Resources Act of 2002 gives XXXXX broad discretion in the processing and approval of fishing permits. XXXXX does not have a legal duty to process, let alone approve, an application for a fishing permit within one day after the submission of the application. Under 24 F.S.M.C. 108, the Executive Director is to review each application submitted and may, at his discretion, solicit views from appropriate persons in the states and hold public hearings when and where necessary. XXXXX also has the discretion to grant or deny a permit under various circumstances, including denying applications when the Executive Director determines that the issuance of a permit would not be in the FSM’s best interests. FSM v. Katzutoku Maru, 15 FSM R. 400, 404 (Pon. 2007). Because XXXXX does not have a legal duty to issue a fishing permit by an applicant’s preferred effective date, a defense of unjustified withholding of the license because it was not issued on the applicant’s preferred date is without merit. FSM v. Katzutoku Maru, 15 FSM R. 400, 404 (Pon. 2007).