Teaching School Funding Sample Clauses

Teaching School Funding. The Teaching School was funded by the Department for Education/National College for Teaching & Leadership for a minimum period of four years (2013-17). This is the fifth year of annual grant funding. The grant of £40K per annum is expected to continue through to 2019 at the least. Payment of an annual grant The annual grant is paid directly to the teaching school with the purpose of enabling the teaching schools alliance to build the necessary leadership and administrative capacity to undertake its work in leading the alliance, including designating and brokering the deployment of System Leaders sponsoring practitioner research and quality assuring all the activity undertaken by an alliance. This is known as the core funding. Core funding was £60,000 for the first year. This funding decreased to £50,000 in the second year and was set at £40,000 for the third and fourth years. This reduction reflected the expectation that alliances will develop more of their own income as they develop. Funding for System Leader deployment will come from additional DfE/NCTL grant funding. Additional funding for specific activities Once designated, teaching schools can receive additional funding if they are commissioned or licensed to deliver activity relating to the six core areas of the teaching schools role i.e.: initial teacher training (ITT) or continuing professional development (CPD). There are three ways in which a school can receive additional funding: • as a licensed provider • commissioned directly by a school • commissioned directly by an organisation (i.e. NCTL, DfE) to complete a set activity In summary, the annual grant pays for the capacity to manage the teaching schools alliance and to carry out research and quality assurance, while funding for the delivery of services and support will come from whoever wishes to provide or purchase such activity. The sustainability of the alliance will, in part, be the result of its ability to generate funding on the basis that the alliance is offering high quality provision. The collaborative fund process Teaching schools are issued funding via the collaborative fund process. Following designation, teaching schools are asked to complete a set of collaborative fund terms and conditions, which shall be renewed at the start of each financial year. At the end of each financial year teaching schools will be asked to complete a collaborative fund evaluation in which they will be asked to clearly demonstrate how they have spent th...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Teaching School Funding. The Teaching School was initially funded by the Department for Education/National College for Teaching & Leadership for a period of four years. This is the final year of annual grant funding before the transition to the DfE’s new Teaching School Hub model. Payment of an annual grant The annual grant is paid directly to the teaching school with the purpose of enabling the teaching schools alliance to build the necessary leadership and administrative capacity to undertake its work in leading the alliance, including designating and brokering the deployment of System Leaders sponsoring practitioner research and quality assuring all the activity undertaken by an alliance. This is known as the core funding. Core funding was £60,000 for the first year. This funding decreased to £50,000 in the second year and was set at £40,000 for subsequent years. This reduction reflected the expectation that alliances will develop more of their own income as they develop. Funding for System Leader deployment may come from additional DfE grant funding. Additional funding for specific activities Once designated, teaching schools can receive additional funding if they are commissioned or licensed to deliver activity relating to the three core areas of the teaching schools role i.e.: initial teacher training (ITT), continuing professional development (CPD) or school-to-school support. There are three ways in which a school can receive additional funding:  as a licensed provider  commissioned directly by a school

Related to Teaching School Funding

  • Program Funding Upon entry into force of this Compact, MCC will grant to the Government, under the terms of this Compact, an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eight Million Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (US$408,850,000) to support the Program (“Program Funding”). The allocation of Program Funding is generally described in Annex II to this Compact.

  • Grant Funding Calculation of GAG 3A-3D. Not used.

  • EDUCATION PROGRAM Measure 1a Is the school implementing the material elements of its Educational Program as defined in the charter contract? Meets Standard: The school implemented the material elements of its Educational Program in all material respects, and, in operation, the education program reflects the essential terms as defined in the charter contract, or the school has obtained approval for a modification to the essential terms. Measure 1b Is the school complying with applicable education requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to education requirements, including but not limited to: • Academic standards, including Common Core • Graduation requirements • State assessment and student testing • Implementation of mandated programming as a result of state or federal funding, including Title I and Title II funding Measure 1c Is the school protecting the rights of students with disabilities? Meets Standard: Consistent with the school’s status and responsibilities as a school within a single LEA under the State Department of Education, the school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract (including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendment Act) relating to the treatment of students with identified disabilities and those suspected of having a disability, including but not limited to: • Equitable access and opportunity to enroll • Identification and referral • Appropriate development and implementation of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and Section 504 plans • Operational compliance including the academic program, assessments and all other aspects of the school’s program and responsibilities • Discipline, including due process protections, manifestation determinations and behavioral intervention plans • Access to the school’s facility and program to students in a lawful manner and consistent with students’ IEPs or Section 504 plans • Appropriate use of all available, applicable funding Measure 1d Is the school protecting the rights of English Language Learner (ELL) students? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to ELL requirements (including Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA] and U.S. Department of Education authorities), including but not limited to: • Equitable access and opportunity to enroll • Required policies related to the service of ELL students • Proper steps for identification of students in need of ELL services • Appropriate and equitable delivery of services to identified students • Appropriate accommodations on assessments • Exiting of students from ELL services • Ongoing monitoring of exited students

  • Special Education Teachers Whenever any Elementary Special Education class to which a student(s) is(are) added as a result of the distribution of students from the class of an absent Elementary Special Education teacher, Article 8-7 shall be in effect. In addition, whenever the class size of the receiving Special Education teacher exceeds the class size maxim mandated by Special Education class size law and/or regulation, the Xxxxxxxx Formula in AAA Case No. 1139-0696- 85, February 21, 1986, shall be used to calculate the compensation which said teacher shall receive as follows: The rate of pay for said teacher for teaching said additional students shall be computed by multiplying the teacher’s daily gross compensation by a fraction in which the denominator is twenty-six (26) and the numerator is the number of children taught in excess of Article 8-1.1 Item 3 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the parties.

  • Per-pupil Funding The School's non-facility general fund per-pupil funding shall be as defined in Sec. 302D-28, HRS. The Commission shall distribute the School's per-pupil allocation each fiscal year pursuant to Sec. 302D-28(f), HRS, and shall provide the School with the calculations used to determine the per-pupil amount each year. All funds distributed to the School from the Commission shall be used solely for the School's educational purposes as appropriated by the Legislature, and the School shall have discretion to determine how such funding shall be allocated at the school level to serve those purposes subject to applicable laws and this Contract.

  • Formula Funding Funding equivalent to the level of funding which would be provided through the funding formula of the LA to a maintained school which had all of that Academy's relevant characteristics, including its number of pupils;

  • BUY AMERICA ACT (National School Lunch Program and Breakfast Program With respect to products purchased by Customers for use in the National School Lunch Program and/or National School Breakfast Program, Contractor shall comply with all federal procurement laws and regulations with respect to such programs, including the Buy American provisions set forth in 7 C.F.R. Part 210.21(d), to the extent applicable. Contractor agrees to provide all certifications required by Customer regarding such programs. In the event Contractor or Contractor’s supplier(s) are unable or unwilling to certify compliance with the Buy American Provision, or the applicability of an exception to the Buy American provision, H-GAC Customers may decide not to purchase from Contractor. Additionally, H-GAC Customers may require country of origin on all products and invoices submitted for payment by Contractor, and Contractor agrees to comply with any such requirement.

  • Special Education Committee The parties agree to establish a committee comprised of representatives from ETFO, the Ministry of Education and school board leadership in the area of special education. Additional representatives may be invited as resources to the committee as needed. The committee will discuss current issues as identified by the parties related to supporting students with special education needs. The committee shall meet regularly commencing no later than November 30, 2015 and recommendations will be made to the Minister of Education by April 30, 2016. Terms of reference will be jointly developed to inform the scope of discussions and recommendations. LETTER OF AGREEMENT #6 BETWEEN The Ontario Public School Board Association (hereinafter called ‘OPSBA’) AND The Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (hereinafter called the ‘ETFO’) AND

  • Education Incentive A. The following monthly education incentive pay will be paid to each employee upon completing the listed degree and providing proof of completion to the Agency. Associate Degree Two percent (2%) Bachelor Degree Four percent (4%)

  • Teacher “Teacher” shall mean all persons in the appropriate unit employed by the District in a position for which the person must be licensed by the State of Minnesota, but shall not include the superintendent and any other licensed administrators who devote more than fifty (50%) percent of their time to administrative or supervisory duties, confidential employees, supervisory employees, essential employees, and such other employees as excluded by law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.