Scenario Clause Samples
The 'Scenario' clause defines a specific set of circumstances or hypothetical situations under which the terms of the agreement will be interpreted or certain actions will be triggered. In practice, this clause outlines particular events, conditions, or sequences—such as a market downturn, a regulatory change, or a party's failure to perform—that are relevant to the contract's operation. By clearly specifying these scenarios, the clause ensures that all parties understand how the agreement will function in various possible futures, thereby reducing ambiguity and helping to manage expectations and risks.
Scenario. The Institution owns the Results and grants the Collaborator a non-exclusive licence to use the Results. The Collaborator has the right to call on the Institution to negotiate an assignment.
Scenario. To provide a straightforward evaluation, the selected evalu- ation scenario describes the application of the approach using the response time metric, which is a QoS-related (e.g., latency, throughput, and packet loss) SLA. The metrics in QoS- related SLAs are quantitative, being able to be automatically verified in the SC. Nevertheless, the designed approach can be modified to fit different types of SLAs, such as service availability. The evaluation scenario was composed of a web server and a client performing periodic requests. A Raspberry Pi model B with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU @ 900 MHz, 1 GB of RAM, and a 150 Mbps Wi-Fi dongle hosted an Apache web server, and a Lenovo ThinkPad T430 with a quad-core Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90 GHz, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1 Gbps Ethernet connection performed the requests as the client. The client requested at every 1 s a PHP page that performed random calculations to introduce load in the server. Moreover, after each finished request, the client retrieved the response time of the request and stored this value in a Comma- Separated-Value (CSV) file. During a 30 minutes interval, 1800 requests were performed and measured (30 min 60 s = 1800); the response times of these requests are depicted in Figure 2. It can be seen in the graph that the majority of the requests were answered in 0.2 s to 0.3 s, and that there are requests with response times over 0.6 s. The average response time for the period was 0.2445 s. Based on these values, the violation threshold was fixed to 0.3 s, which is depicted using a red dashed line in the graph. 0.9 0.8 Response Time (seconds) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Response Time Violation Threshold Fig. 2: Response Time between the Client and the Web Server Listing 6: Compensate and Deposit Functions
Scenario. Start an Activity and its associated UI. This is one pattern for starting a unit of work (which involves launching a user interface). In this pattern, the activity is the starting point. From the user’s point of view, a user starts a unit of work to do his / her work. The unit of work (activity) may or may not launch a user interface to complete the unit of work.
Scenario. The Participant has agreed to load shift of 1MW per Event at a price of $27,000 per MW (Bid Rate). There is a total of 26 Events for the Term. There were 2 Events in a Month. The Baseline for this Premises had been measured and established as 2MW for the first Event and 1.5MW for the second Event. For the first Event, the actual demand at the Premises was 2.6MW. The fees payable by Western Power to the Participant for the first Event will be calculated as follows: The maximum possible fees for the Event is $1,038.46 comprising an Availability Incentive of $207.69 and Performance Incentive of $830.77. The Achieved Flexibility for this Event is equal to the difference between the actual demand at the Premises and the Baseline (i.e 2.6MW – 2MW = 0.6MW). This equates to 60% of the 1MW Flexibility Target. Performance Incentive = $830.77 x 60% = $498.46 Availability Incentive = $207.69 Fee Payable: $498.46 + $207.69 = $706.15 For the second Event, the actual demand at the Premises was 1.9MW. The fees payable by Western Power to the Participant for the second Event will be calculated as follows: The maximum possible fees for the Event is $1,038.46 comprising an Availability Incentive of $207.69 and Performance Incentive of $830.77. The Achieved Flexibility for this Event is equal to the difference between the actual demand at the Premises and the Baseline (i.e 1.9MW –
Scenario. Registering a consumer and supplier to receive and supply anEvent using the PUSH method.
Scenario. 2 applies to employees who are appointed to a role to which this clause 46applies but who act in a position not covered by this Agreement (that is, a senior contract position). Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Salary Paid the salary for the position as described in Appendix 1C for the period of acting *Greater of: • the minimum remuneration for the senior contract position; or • a higher grade rate set by their General Manager /managers where applicable; or • their current rate Leave Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Conditions Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause 46 while acting Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause while acting Employees who are not appointed to a role to which this clause 46 applies but who act in a position under this clause 46 are not entitled to either: • Take; or • Accrue rostered day off during the period of acting
Scenario. 2 – Evoke or its acquiror terminates as a result of an Evoke Change of Control
Scenario. The Design Documents prepared by CONTRACTOR and approved by COMPANY -------- show a 2 inch pipe. A 2 inch pipe is installed. However, the Facility requires a 4 inch pipe. The 2 inch pipe is torn out and replaced by a 4 inch pipe.
Scenario the Scenario to be written by the Writer pursuant to this agreement, based on the annexed Synopsis and suitable for being adapted for a feature film of approx. [@@@] minutes, as well as any part of the Scenario if the Scenario has only been partially produced at any time; the Scenario is also understood to mean any version of the written and/or to be written Scenario, as well as all additions, changes and improvements, including any after the completion, that are implemented at a later stage. Finally, the Scenario is also understood to mean the Synopsis as written by the Writer, as well as the treatment yet to be written, if applicable.
Scenario. The Design Documents show a tank in one location and a pipe running -------- past the tank. A subcontractor negligently installs the tank in the space in which the pipe is to run. RESULT: COMPANY originally paid for the design of the tank and pipe and ------ for the cost of procuring and installing the tank and pipe. CONTRACTOR will pay the additional cost of either removing and relocating the tank or relocating the pipe. The Budgeted Cost of the Work is not adjusted. SCENARIO: Soil studies obtained by COMPANY show a subsurface area clear of -------- obstructions. The Design Documents prepared by CONTRACTOR and approved by COMPANY show a pipe running through the unobstructed area. When the area is excavated, granite is found.