Restriction of Access. Tempe reserves the rights to: (i) prevent or restrict access to any portion of EVBOM by such security procedures or devices as Tempe may consider necessary or appropriate; (ii) control or prevent access by and remove any person who is loitering or whose presence in the judgment of Tempe’s security or facilities management personnel is prejudicial to the safety, character and interests of EVBOM or who is in the judgment of such personnel is intoxicated or under the influence of liquor or drugs; and (iii) limit or prevent access to all or any portion of EVBOM, activate emergency controls or procedures or otherwise take such action or preventative measures deemed necessary by Tempe for the safety of RPTA or other occupants of EVBOM or the protection of EVBOM or other property located thereon or therein, in case of fire or other casualty, riot or other civil disorder, strike or labor unrest, public excitement or other dangerous condition or threat thereof.
Restriction of Access. To Seller’s Knowledge, there are no current federal, state, county or municipal plans to materially restrict or materially change access to any part of the Real Property from any highway or road leading directly to or abutting any part of the Real Property.
Restriction of Access. Seller has no knowledge of any current federal, state, county or municipal plans to materially restrict or materially change access to any part of the Real Property from any highway or road leading directly to or abutting any part of the Real Property.
Restriction of Access. In the event an Uplifting Service Workshop Leader leaves the employment of Client or Client terminates their relationship, Client will notify Licensor and provide Licensor with updated contact information for such Uplifting Service Workshop Leader, prior to or within 10 days upon termination.
Restriction of Access. When asked if threat/intrusion (cyber intelligences) information shared between organisations be restricted to CISOs, the group was split, with 11 saying Yes and 15 saying No. Those who said no, indicated a range of reasons: • It depends on the organisational structure and where the security team / unit is located: cyber intelligence should be made available where it is needed / to those who have to act on the information. • It should be 'trusted' persons (not just CISOs), to ensure information is available to those persons best placed to analyse and act upon it. • CIOs and IT staff. • CISOs could present a 'bottleneck’. • The CISO must have all the information to coordinate the different teams/areas. • The trusted network should be limited to cyber security professionals to prevent confusion or panic. • Relevant information should be distributed to expert analysts and potentially to testers or designers. • It depends on the size of the organisation, number of people involved in security. • For sharing information inside the organisation, a confidentiality policy controls distribution of information inside the organisation (anonymised if required). • IT manager level. • Information sharing must start on a technical level. CISOs usually do not have the capability to present and consume this information in an appropriate way. • SOC leads in our company so SOC leader or SOC contact is an ideal point for sharing. While there are some conflicting views expressed, the general consensus seems to be that for each organisation, they have to decide on the main point of contact, and the internal policy for distribution. Relevant shares include cyber security professionals (analysis and policy adjustment), system designers and engineers etc. (repair/mitigation). Interestingly, when sharing with a wider group (CISO and other team members) only 26% of respondents suggest recipients should receive all the cyber intelligence. The majority (74%) suggest they should receive only part of the information, depending on their role (i.e. only what is relevant to their job). If information of cyber threats/incidents is shared between railway stakeholders, via a trusted point of contact, the decision on who to provide with “selected” information might be part of the trust relationship (i.e. decided by internal policy).
Restriction of Access. Tempe reserves the rights to: (i) prevent or restrict access to any portion of City Property by such security procedures or devices as Tempe may consider necessary or appropriate, provided that such restricted access shall not impair NSAA’s use of the City Property for NSAA Parking in non-emergency situations; (ii) control or prevent access by and remove any person who is loitering or whose presence in the judgment of Tempe’s security or facilities management personnel is prejudicial to the safety, character and interests of City Property or who is in the judgment of such personnel is intoxicated or under the influence of liquor or drugs; and (iii) limit or prevent access to all or any portion of City Property, activate emergency controls or procedures or otherwise take such action or preventative measures deemed necessary by Tempe for the safety of NSAA or other occupants of City Property or the protection of City Property or other property located thereon or therein, in case of fire or other casualty, riot or other civil disorder, strike or labor unrest, public excitement or other dangerous condition or threat thereof.
Restriction of Access. Use reasonable efforts to ensure that access is restricted to Authorized Users, and to protect the Licensed Material from any use that is not permitted under this Agreement.
Restriction of Access i. Grantor, its successors and assigns, in its discretion may restrict or prohibit access to the Easement from time-to-time for special events, or to construct improvements.
Restriction of Access. DYCD shall, and shall cause Provider to, restrict access to confidential information to persons who have a legitimate work-related purpose to access such information. DYCD agrees that it will instruct its employees, Provider, and agents, and shall cause Provider to instruct the employees and agents of Provider, to maintain the confidentiality of any and all information required to be kept confidential by this Agreement.
Restriction of Access. Sellers have no Knowledge of any current federal, state, county or municipal plans to restrict or change access to any part of the Seller Real Property from any highway or road leading directly to or abutting any part of the Seller Real Property. For the purposes of this Section 7.29, the phrase “Knowledge” shall include the present actual knowledge (excluding any constructive or imputed knowledge) of Xxxxxxx Xxxx.
