Requests for Proposals. Requests for proposal are Department Requests for Proposals (RFPs) and/or Requests for Application (RFAs) that solicit applications in connection with any grant hereunder.
Requests for Proposals. The City will require that for each provision of this Agreement (other than the hiring and retaining of the Independent Evaluator) that requires a Request for Proposal (“RFP”), the RFP will be published within 45 calendar days of the Effective Date of this Agreement.
Requests for Proposals. All Commission Requests for Proposals (RFPs) that solicit applications in connection with any individual grant hereunder shall be incorporated by reference. GRANTS – State Financial Assistance Contract FY 2005
Requests for Proposals. Any and all requests for proposals, or portions thereof, issued by the City in connection with the Services to be provided under this Agreement, as designated by the DWS Director;
Requests for Proposals the District will contact a number of professionals (engineers, architects and accounts) and request that they submit written proposals. The RFPs may include negotiations on a fair and equal basis. The RFPs and evaluation of such proposals will consider price plus other factors such as:
Requests for Proposals. SBH shall comply with all applicable laws regarding selection and hiring of the Contractor. All requests for proposals shall be consistent with the Final Design and the Approved Plans and Specifications (if then approved), and SBH shall not send out such requests for proposal or otherwise engage the Contractor unless and until receiving prior written approval from the City.
Requests for Proposals. The Requests for Proposals is the formal document that contains specific details about the project all of the detailed elements of the project that the commissioning body needs all applicants to adhere to. This is not a contract, but a detailed description of the process and expectations you have on the artist. The Request for Proposals most often is asking for an artist to respond with a specific work in mind for a specific site. This means the RFP must contain a lot of specific information and is often created in concert between cultural, purchasing and legal staff within the commissioning body. Once a standardized RFP is created, future RFP should not deviate greatly in style and format, which means it will become an increasingly easier task to complete. An RFP should include the following elements: • Information about the commissioning body • Clear objectives for the work • Detailed site information including site maps, drawing, engineering information, and any technical considerations (ie location of services, safety distances, etc) • Technical parameters (size, weight, materials, above/below ground factors, etc.) • Clearly defined explanation of the jury process going forward • A full project timeline – submission date, selection date, fabrication timing, installation date, etc • All financial information (total contract value, payment schedule if known, etc) • Insurance, WSIB and employment requirements • Detailed list of requirements and a Check List (all of the items and information you want the artist to submit including formats and methods of submission) • Eligibility criteria • Standardized application form (basic contact info) Public Meeting / Question Period Most public art processes include a public meeting or question period where responding artists can ask specific questions about the project. A public meeting is a huge advantage for local artists as they will be encouraged to visit the site, ask questions in person and clarify their ideas. These meetings are also extremely useful for municipal staff as they give you an indication of how artists are responding to your Call and any areas of concern well in advance of the project being executed.
Requests for Proposals. Requests for competitive sealed proposals shall be used pursuant to T.C.A. § 12-3-1207 and may be used only when qualifications, experience, or competence are more important than price in making the purchase, and either (1) when there is more than one (1) solution to a purchasing issue and competitive sealed proposals would assist in choosing the best solution; or (2) when there is no readily identifiable solution to a purchasing issue and competitive sealed proposals would assist in identifying one (1) or more solutions. The request for competitive sealed proposals shall state the relative importance of price and other evaluation factors. The award shall be made to the responsible respondent whose proposal the governing body determines is the most advantageous to the City, taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set out in the request for competitive sealed proposals. No other factor may be used in the evaluation.
Requests for Proposals. From and after the Closing and until the earlier to occur of (a) the fourth anniversary of Term-Conversion and (b) Borrower having entered into Bidding Threshold Power Sales Agreements covering, in the aggregate, at least 75 MW of "firm" energy and/or capacity, unless Agent otherwise consents, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, submit or cause Power Marketer to submit on its behalf, bona fide, good faith bids on all requests for proposal or similar offers which can then be supplied in whole or in part from the Project to enter into Bidding Threshold Power Sales Agreements and/or Pasadena Unit Power Sales Agreements meeting the requirements of a Bidding Threshold Power Sales Agreement.
Requests for Proposals. Requests for competitive sealed proposals may be used only when qualifications, experience, or competence are more important than price in making the purchase, and either (1) when there is more than one (1) solution to a purchasing issue and competitive sealed proposals would assist in choosing the best solution; or (2) when there is no readily identifiable solution to a purchasing issue and competitive sealed proposals would assist in identifying one (1) or more solutions. The request for competitive sealed proposals shall state the relative importance of price and other evaluation factors. The award shall be made to the responsible respondent whose proposal the governing body determines is the most advantageous to the City, taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set out in the request for competitive sealed proposals. No other factor may be used in the evaluation. APPENDIX A
