Protection of Knowledge Sample Clauses

Protection of Knowledge. 10.1.1 If, in the course of carrying out work on the Project, a joint invention, design or work is made (and one or more Parties are contributors to it), and if the features of such joint invention design or work are such that it is not possible to sepa­rate them for the purpose of applying for, obtaining and/or maintaining the relevant patent protection or any other intellectual property right, the Parties concerned agree that they may jointly apply to obtain and/or maintain the relevant right together with any other parties concerned (which usually will be Assistant Contractors). The Parties concerned shall seek to agree between them and the other parties concerned arrangements for applying for, obtaining and/or maintaining such right on a case-by-case basis. Where the parties concerned are solely Parties, so long as any such right is in force, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to use and to license such right without any financial compensation to or the con­sent of the other Parties concerned. For the avoidance of doubt, joint ownership of an invention, design or work shall not affect the obligations arising under this Consortium Agreement or the Contract.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Protection of Knowledge. The costs of the protection of knowledge generated in the framework of the project shall comprise the actual costs necessary for adequate and effective protection for such knowledge, taking into account the interests of the Community. They shall be eligible only in so far as the Commission has given its prior written approval to the contractors and in so far as the competition rules, in particular those under the Community framework for State aid to research and development, are complied with. In the absence of observations within one month of receipt of the request made by the coordinator, the approval of the Commission shall be deemed to have been given. They comprise: - the costs of documentary research preliminary to the filing of an application for the granting of an industrial property right, - the fees paid to the competent authorities that are necessary with a view to the granting of an industrial property right or its territorial extension, provided that prior documentary research, as referred to in the first indent, has been carried out, and - the fees paid to the competent authorities to extend the duration of the industrial property right. Fees paid to advisers for knowledge protection purposes shall be reimbursable provided that an application for the granting of an industrial property right has been subsequently filed. Personnel costs incurred in this connection shall be reimbursable, provided that:
Protection of Knowledge. 9.1. Insofar as the execution of the Assignment by Invert Robotics leads to patentable matter, Invert Robotics has the right to apply for a patent in its name and at its expense.
Protection of Knowledge. In case a Contractor, Other entity or Member (“Originator”) decides in its sole discretion that it does not intend to seek adequate and effective protection over (part of) its Knowledge resulting from the Project, then the Originator shall inform in writing the other Contractors, Other entities and Members, through the Coordinator, and any Contractor, Other entity or any Member interested in applying to obtain and maintain such protection shall inform accordingly the other Contractors, Other entities and Members through the Coordinator and in writing within one (1) month of receipt of the relevant notice. In case several Contractors, Other entities or Members are interested in so applying, they shall strive to set up among themselves and with the Originator appropriate agreements to this end. Should no other Contractor, Other entity or Member show an interest in so applying, the Coordinator shall inform accordingly the Commission in accordance with Annex II General Conditions – C, Article II.33 of the EC Contract. The foregoing shall be without prejudice to the Access Rights of all Contractors, Other entities or Members that will remain unaffected. The agreement concluded between a Contractor, an Other entity or a Member and a subcontractor shall prohibit the subcontractor from applying for any intellectual or industrial property right with regard to the Knowledge.
Protection of Knowledge. 10.1.1 If, in the course of carrying out work on the , a joint invention, design or work is made (and one or more are contributors to it), and if the features of such joint invention design or work are such that it is not possible to separate them for the purpose of applying for, obtaining and/or maintaining the relevant patent protection or any other intellectual property right, the concerned agree that they may jointly apply to obtain and/or maintain the relevant right together with any other parties concerned (which usually will be ). The concerned shall seek to agree between them and the other parties concerned arrangements for applying for, obtaining and/or maintaining such right on a case-by-case basis. Where the parties concerned are solely , so long as any such right is in force, the concerned shall be entitled to use and to license such right without any financial compensation to or the consent of the other concerned. For the avoidance of doubt, joint ownership of an invention, design or work shall not affect the obligations arising under this or the . assigned its rights shall have at least the same as the non-involved .
Protection of Knowledge. 1. Contractors shall provide adequate and effective protection for knowledge owned by them which is capable of use, in particular in the case of joint ownership. The terms of the protection, including protection periods, shall be defined in the technological implementation plan, which must be in conformity with the principles set out in Articles 16 and 17 of this Annex.
Protection of Knowledge. 8. Other specific costs . . . . . . . . . Subtotal Indirect Costs 9. Overheads . . . . . . . . . Adjustments 10. Adjustments to costs previously reported 6 Total %7 Community financial contribution:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Protection of Knowledge. 1. Participants who own knowledge resulting from the project shall provide adequate and effective protection for such knowledge, in particular in the case of joint ownership, for an appropriate duration, in accordance with any applicable regulation or convention.
Protection of Knowledge. 2.1. Where Knowledge is capable of industrial or commercial application, its owner shall provide for its adequate and effective protection in conformity with relevant legal provisions, the national funding rules and the Consortium Agreement, and having due regard to the Legitimate interests of the Participants concerned.
Protection of Knowledge. In case a Contractor or Member (“Originator”) decides in its sole discretion that it does not intend to seek adequate and effective protection over (part of) its Knowledge resulting from the Project, then the Originator shall inform in writing the other Contractors and Members, through the Coordinator, and any Contractor or any Member interested in applying to obtain and maintain such protection shall inform accordingly the other Contractors and Members through the Coordinator and in writing within one (1) month of receipt of the relevant notice. In case several Contractors or Members are interested in so applying, they shall strive to set up among themselves and with the Originator appropriate agreements to this end.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.