Position Description Review/Classification Procedure Sample Clauses

Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. A. Employee Request for PD Review Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, will make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)–(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. Article 14
Sample 1Sample 2
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure a. Employee Request for Position Description Review: Any employee who feels that he or she is performing duties outside the scope of his or her position description, or that the position description is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to his or her immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The employee shall make a summary of the inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described. Discussion with the supervisor and a determination on whether or not to submit a new position description will be concluded within 30 days of the employee’s request for review. If the position description is found to be inaccu- rate, a new position description will be prepared and submitted for classification by the end of this 30-day period. In conducting such reviews, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments.
Sample 1

Related to Position Description Review/Classification Procedure

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Classification Appeal Procedure An employee shall have the right to appeal, through the Union, the classification of the position the employee occupies, or where a point rating plan has been used, the right to appeal the position's level. Classification matters are not grievable under Article 8 of this Agreement. Instead, the following procedures shall be followed.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.