Position Description Review/Classification Procedure Sample Clauses

The Position Description Review/Classification Procedure clause outlines the process for evaluating and categorizing job positions within an organization. It typically involves a formal review of job duties, responsibilities, and required qualifications to ensure that each position is accurately described and classified according to established standards or pay grades. This procedure helps maintain consistency and fairness in job classifications, ensuring that employees are appropriately compensated and that organizational roles are clearly defined.
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. A. Employee Request for PD Review Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, will make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)–(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing. 1. Employee submits request for PD review along with a summary of inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described to their immediate supervisor. The employee and supervisor will discuss whether or not to submit a new PD. 2. If the supervisor agrees that the PD is inaccurate, a proposed PD will be prepared by the supervisor, and the employee will be promptly provided with copies of all other documents the employee must complete. In preparing the proposed PD, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments, if applicable. If further modifications of the proposed PD occur prior to classification, the supervisor will discuss the changes with the employee. Agency documents to be completed by employees as part of the PD review will be clear, concise, understandable, and similar for all employees and posted on the Classification section of the HRM website. 3. After the proposed PD and required documents are completed, the PD review package will be submitted to HRM by the supervisor for classification. A copy of the review package will be given to the employee. B. Management initiated PD Review: When a PD review is initiated by Management (for example, new classification standards or supervisor perceives a change in duties), the supervisor will discuss proposed changes to the PD and will consider feedback from the employee prior to submitting the PD review package to HRM for classification. The employee and supervisor will complete the applicable documents required to provide a complete PD Review Package. C. If the employee and supervisor do not agree on the accuracy of the PD, the employee may grieve the accuracy of the PD in accordance with Article 23. D. For all PD reviews, Management will communicate the classification determination to the employee within 60 days from the time the completed PD review package was submitted for classification. The employee will be given a copy of the reclassified PD, cover sheet, and, if applicable, the classifier’s evaluation statement. E. The employee may have Union representation during any discussions between the employee and supervis...
View SourceView Similar (9)
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure. Employee Request for PD Review (excluding Research Scientist positions): Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)-(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure a. Employee request for PD review (excluding research scientist positions): Any employee who feels that they are performing duties outside the scope of their PD, or that the PD is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to their immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The total aggregate timeframe for the process in (1)–(3) below will not exceed 45 days, unless mutually agreed in writing. (1) Employee submits request for a PD review, along with a summary of inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described to their immediate supervisor. The employee and supervisor will discuss whether or not to submit a new PD. (2) If the supervisor agrees that the PD is inaccurate, a proposed PD will be prepared, and the employee will be promptly provided with copies of all other documents the employee must complete. In preparing the proposed PD, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments, if applicable. If further modifications of the proposed PD occur prior to classification, the supervisor will discuss the changes with the employee. Agency documents to be completed by employees as part of the PD review will be clear, concise, understandable, and similar for all employees and posted on the Classification section of the Human Resource Management (HRM) Web site. (3) After the proposed PD and required documents are completed, the PD review package will be submitted to HRM by the supervisor for classification. A copy of the review package will be given to the employee.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Position Description Review/Classification Procedure a. Employee Request for Position Description Review: Any employee who feels that he or she is performing duties outside the scope of his or her position description, or that the position description is otherwise inaccurate, may make a written request to his or her immediate supervisor that the position be reviewed. The employee shall make a summary of the inaccuracies and/or additional duties not described. Discussion with the supervisor and a determination on whether or not to submit a new position description will be concluded within 30 days of the employee’s request for review. If the position description is found to be inaccu- rate, a new position description will be prepared and submitted for classification by the end of this 30-day period. In conducting such reviews, the supervisor will consider the employee’s written and oral comments. b. When a position description review is initiated by Management (e.g., new classification standards or supervisor perceives a change in duties), the supervi- sor will discuss proposed changes to the position description and will consider feedback from the employee, prior submitting the new position description for classification. c. When a position description is submitted for classification, Management will communicate the classification determination to the employee within 60 days from the time the position description was submitted for classification. d. The employee may have Union representation during any discussions related to the review and classification. e. If the employee is not satisfied with the results of the review procedure, he or she may grieve the accuracy of the position description in accordance with Article 9. Classification appeals are addressed in Section 4 below. f. Management shall refrain from temporarily reassigning an employee’s work during the position description review if the sole purpose for reassigning the work is to avoid reclassification of the employee’s position.
View Source

Related to Position Description Review/Classification Procedure

  • Classification Review Grand Valley State University and APSS shall jointly determine the review assessment survey instrument to be used at Grand Valley State University. The parties shall maintain a Joint Review Committee, composed of three members appointed by the Human Resources Office and three members appointed by the Alliance. Bargaining unit members questioning the assigned classification of their position may do so by using the following procedure: A. Meet with the Employment Manager in the Human Resources Office to discuss the review process, changes in their job responsibilities, duties and any other process questions they may have. B. PSS member will fill out the assessment survey and email to the Employment Manager along with any other documentation that supports the request. The survey instrument will be jointly administered/reviewed by the Assessment Team (consisting of the Employment Manager and an Alliance member of the Joint Review Committee). A meeting with the PSS is scheduled for a verbal review of the documentation and to answer any questions the Assessment Team may have. The supervisor or appointing officer is encouraged to attend. If the Assessment Team believes a job site visit is warranted as a result of the survey information, they will schedule a time for a joint visit. C. The completed survey instrument shall be coded. The survey results, as determined by the Assessment Team, shall be shared with the survey participant. D. After receiving the survey results, the survey participant, if they so choose shall have the opportunity to meet with the Joint Review Committee for additional input and appeal. Any additional information shall be reviewed by the Committee, and where the Committee feels it is necessary, the survey will be recoded, in a manner mutually agreeable. E. The Joint Review Committee shall then deliberate as to the merit of the upgrade requested by the participant. If the Committee is not able to reach a consensus, the University will decide on the classification. The Alliance may appeal that decision through the arbitration procedure of the collective bargaining agreement. Professional Support Staff members may engage in the review process no more than once per year. Supervisors questioning the assigned classification of a staff member’s position shall provide supporting rationale, complete an assessment survey instrument and discuss with Manager of Employment. The Manager of Employment shall notify an Alliance Representative that a Supervisor is reviewing a staff member’s classification. The review and outcome shall be completed within 45 working days unless the Alliance Representative and Manager of Employment mutually agreed to an extension. The Alliance will be provided with the scored instrument and any supporting rationale.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.