Figure 9. In respect to the Class C passing-beam, the Class W passing-beam both with bending modes and a driving-beam, and designed for right-hand traffic only. The passing-beam and its modes shall not be operated simultaneously with the driving-beam in and/or another reciprocally incorporated headlamp.
Figure 9. XRD analyses are correlated with the imaging techniques SEM/EDS. Deterioration of the wool structure increase by chemical breakdown of disulfide bridges within structural units of the first layer and the exocuticle and matrix of the cortex.
Figure 9. A general sketch of the ITD cart. ***CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
Examples of Figure 9 in a sentence
Figure 8 Language selectionConfiguration process begins by pressing on connected device (Figure 9 Device connected via USB).
Figure 9: Example PUCCH resource configuration corresponding to row 4 of Table 9.2.1-1 extended to support enhanced (multi-RB) PUCCH Format 0/1, i.e., NRB > 1.
Figure 9 Device connected via USBAfter connection to Configurator Status window will be displayed (Figure 10 Configurator Status window).
Monitoring locations shall be those shown in Figure 9 of the report prepared by Heilig & Partners Pty Ltd being Appendix 4 to the AEE application.
Figure 9 represents an example output from a Sign test, when applied to an example Ammonia-Nitrogen paired data set (Influent-Effluent for each event sampled).
More Definitions of Figure 9
Figure 9. Reducing an instance of 3-SAT with N variables {xi}i∈[N] and m clauses {Cj}j∈[m] to an instance of R-Subset-φℓ for ℓ ≥ 3 with n = ℓ + 2N + (ℓ − 1)m elements in R, where R = F1+N+m. Here, 0 (resp., 1) values inside the vectors refer to the 0 (resp., 1) element of . Proof sketch of Theorem 6.9. We extend this reduction to show that R-Subset-φℓ for ℓ > 1 is also NP-complete, where R is a ring of appropriate size with Hadamard product. Each of the ai (for i ∈ [n]) elements and the target value t in an instance of R-Subset-φℓ is an element in R and thereby a vector of elements in F. Unlike simple addition, since φℓ is a sum of products, if (any) kth entry in the target value is a non-zero element in F, the solution to a yes instance of R-Subset-φℓ must consist of at least ℓ elements with non-zero kth entries. Therefore, depending on ℓ, we need to define additional elements in the reduction. We give an overview of our reduction from any 3-SAT instance to R-Subset-φℓ for ℓ ≥ 3; the special case of ℓ = 2 requires a slight modification that is addressed in Appendix D.1. In a similar way to Subset-Sum, this reduction can also be adjusted to show that there exists s ∈ Θ(n), for which (s, R)-Subset-φℓ problem is also NP-complete, which is sketched in Appendix D.1. − Given a 3-SAT instance with N variables {xi}i∈[N] and m clauses {Cj}j∈[m], define a R-Subset- φℓ instance with ℓ + 2N + (ℓ 1)m elements, where R = F1+N+m. As shown in Figure 9, each of these elements is a vector of 1 + N + m elements in the field F and are defined as follows: • An element α0 ∈ R, whose first entry is 1. All the remaining entries in α0 correspond to 0. • For each k ∈ [ℓ − 1], define αk ∈ R, whose first N + 1 entries correspond to 1, and the remaining entries correspond to 0. • For each i ∈ [N ], define two elements vi ∈ R and v′ ∈ R. The (1 + i)th entry of both these i ∈ ¬ ∈ numbers is set to 1. If xi Cj, then the (1 + N + j)th entry of vi is set to 1, else if xi Cj, then the (1 + N + j)th entry of v′ is set to 1. All the remaining entries correspond to 0. • For each j ∈ [m] and k ∈ [ℓ − 1], define element ck ∈ R. The (1 + N + j)th entry in ck corresponds j j to 1 and the remaining entries correspond to 0. • The target element t is also a vector of 1 + N + m elements in F, with all its entries set to 1. Now, given a satisfying assignment for the 3-SAT instance, the corresponding witness for the R-Subset-φℓ instance includes the following: It includes α0 and each αk for k ∈ [ℓ − 1]. For each i ∈ [N ],...
Figure 9. XML representation of SenML data Figure 10 shows the byte aligned EXI representation of XML data. 00000000 a00048806c200200 1d75726e3a646576 |..H.l ...urn:dev| 00000010 3a6f 773a31306532 3037336130313038 |:ow:10e2073a0108| 00000020 3030363303010674 656d700306646567 |0063...temp..deg| 00000030 430100e701010001 02 |C | Figure 10: EXI representation of SenML data It can be seen that the EXI representation is considerably smaller, resulting in 57 bytes only, leading to more than 3-fold reduction in size. This is especially important when putting this in the context of constrained IoT devices and available network channels. Furthermore, this fits well with the CoAP specification [19] that is well-suited for the short message packets transmitted over UDP. Messages larger than an IP packet result in undesirable packet fragmentation. A CoAP message, appropriately encapsulated, should fit within a single IP packet (i.e., avoid IP fragmentation) and (by fitting into one UDP payload) needs to fit within a single IP datagram. Furthermore, another important aspect of using CoAP is that its choice of message size parameters works well with IPv6 which is very significant in the IoT6 context.
Figure 9. Trade weighted effective exchange rate indices 9 2010 Source: Bank of Namibia
Figure 9. Some of the IEEE Fellow grade members being recognized
Figure 9. The “User profile” page of the Web TechTIDE Project interface will contain a “Subscribe to TechTIDE Warning System” option, where the user will choose the products that he/she is interested in receiving warning alert notifications in his/her email.
Figure 9. As is'' (left) and ''to be'' (right) 20 Figure 10: Clinical workflow (typical example) 24 Figure 11: Processing and post-processing example (Smart DTI fiber tracking) [3] 24 Figure 12: Context for the Cooling System for Transmission Plant Application (CS_UC) 26 Figure 13: The original iFEST tool platform, showing the development focus points within EMC2 28 Figure 14: Demonstrator: UC Specific Tools Framework 29 List of tables Table 1: Quantitative metrics to be used in the assessment of results, for UC12.1 12 Table 2: Abbreviations 35
Figure 9. All open infringement cases, development per EFTA State 59 50 50 37 35 35 33 32 31 28 29 24 29 28 24 22 20 19 18 21 16 70 60 50 Cases 40 30 20 10 0 May-01 Nov-01 May-02 Nov-02 May-03 Nov-03 May-04 ISL LIE NOR Note: Total number of open infringement proceedings against the three EFTA States. The numbers are collected from the Authority’s six last Internal Market Scoreboards. Figure 9 illustrates the development the last three years of the open infringement cases for each EFTA State. After a peak in 2001, the total number of open cases has remained relatively stable for the last two years. The sharp decrease from 2001 to 2002 is explained by the improved transposition records for the EFTA States, which led to a reduction in the number of non-transposition cases. Infringement cases concerning non-conformity or incorrect application of Internal Market rules and principles Infringement cases can be divided into two categories. The first category relates to late implementation, meaning that directives are not transposed into the national legislation of the EFTA States within the set time limits. Infringement cases in this category are generally clear-cut and therefore seldom the subject of legally complicated disputes between the EFTA State concerned and the Authority. The same is not always true when it comes to the second category of cases, which relate to non- conformity or incorrect application of EEA provisions. This concerns situations in which the Authority, having acknowledged notification of transposition of a directive from an EFTA State, considers at a later stage, that the national legislation does not fully conform to the requirements of the relevant directive or that the application by the EFTA State is in one way or another incorrect. Whereas figures 8 and 9 above include both categories of cases, the figure below focus on the second category. Both the Authority and the European Commission include these figures in their Scoreboards to indicate the infringement problems faced by the EEA States in addition to mere non-transposition.8 Figure 10: Infringement cases due to non-conformity or incorrect application 9 149 125 104 94 79 77 58 55 53 52 44 39 28 28 24 23 10 160 140 120 100 Open cases 80 60 40 20 IT FR ES DE EL BE UK IE NL AT PT LU SE FI DK NOR LIE ISL Source EU figures: European Commission’s Internal Market Scoreboard No. 13. Note: Open infringement cases due to non-conformity or incorrect application on 30 April 2004. 8 Figures in EFTA Score...