Special Case. (a) In the case of a competition for a Course Instructor position, Academic Skills Centre Instructor, or Trent-ESL Instructor only, where a candidate has been determined to have substantially and demonstrably superior qualifications and/or reputation than a candidate who has the Right of First Refusal, then the former may be appointed. The parties acknowledge that the following criteria may be indicative of such superior qualifications and/or reputation: substantially superior academic qualifications, recognition as a national or international expert in the field, or recognition as a distinguished author and/or prestigious visitor.
Special Case. Value-Based Programs
Special Case. An employee, who is off work on the date provided for in Article 2.01(a) or (b) because of an injury suffered in the employ of the Company less than one year earlier and for which he is receiving Workplace Safety and Insurance Board benefits, shall be deemed to be a member from the date provided until such W.S.I.B. benefits end or until one year from the date of the injury, whichever first occurs.
Special Case. In the special case where both the following conditions are true, Procurement Officer’s signature on the Acceptance is Contractor’s authorization to perform and therefore no Order is required: 3.12.4.1. the Contract is identified as being a “single-agency/single-project” contract and 3.12.4.2. the Contract was created in The State’s e-Procurement System as something other than a “Master/ Blanket” type. 3.12.5.
Special Case. When n = 3m (m ≥ 1), our basic protocol runs as follows: Step 1.(Initialization) Let G(1) = {U3j−2, U3j−1, U3j}, j = j
Special Case. Cross-border Gas Transfer A transfer due to a gas transfer between the customer and the customer of another storage facility operator, which shall be performed between the working gas subaccount of a German market area (GASPOOL or NCG) and a discounted or undiscounted working gas subaccount that is allocated to the Dutch transport network of Gasunie Transport Services B.V. (“Discounted/Undiscounted GTS Account”), shall be possible – in accordance with the requirements of BEATE – • between an Undiscounted Account of the customer and an Undiscounted GTS Account of the respective customer of the other storage facility operator without a transfer fee being charged in accordance with § 7, section (2); • between a Discounted Account of the customer and a Discounted GTS Account of the respective customer of the other storage facility operator; in such a case, VGS shall charge a transfer fee in accordance with § 7, section (2) if the customer transfers gas quantities to the customer of the other storage facility operator.
Special Case. Donation from an EFPIA company to a beneficiary This section does not apply to ‘donation of money’, which is considered as a Financial Contribution (see. So it only applies to the physical donation of goods (consumables or equipment). Example: An EFPIA company buys consumables, equipment, etc. and ships them to a beneficiary. The donation of consumables and equipment is not considered as a financial contribution. This must be reported as follows: • The EFPIA company declares the actual eligible costs it has incurred in its accounts. It must be reported in the reporting period when the costs have been incurred. • The beneficiary does not have to report anything. Example: consumables purchased by an EFPIA partner (10.000€ excluding VAT) and shipped to a beneficiary: EFPIA Company Beneficiary Form C Form C Eligible costs 10.000 EUR 0
Special Case. In the special case where both the following conditions are true, Procurement Officer’s signature on the Acceptance is Contractor’s authorization to perform and therefore no Order is required: (a) the Contract is identified as being a “single-agency/single- project” contract in the Special Terms and Conditions and (b) the Contract was created in ProcureAZ as something other than a “Master/ Blanket” type. 3.14.5 NO MINIMUMS OR COMMITMENTS. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the Special Terms and Conditions: (a) Contractor shall not impose any minimum dollar amount, item count, services volume, or services duration on Orders; (b) State makes no commitment of any kind concerning the quantity or monetary value of activity actually initiated or completed during the term of the Contract; (c) Contractor shall only deliver or perform as authorized by Orders; and (d) State is not limited as to the number of Orders it may issue for the Contract. For clarity of intent, the foregoing applies equally whether an Eligible Agency issues the Order or, if applicable, a Co-Op Buyer issues it. 3.14.6
Special Case the intuitu personae agreement A special case is the intuitu personae agreement. When an agreement is executed intuitu personae, the identity of one of the parties or an employee or agent is an essential consideration of one of the parties to enter into the agreement. In case the person whose identity is essential to the agreement disappears from the scene for any reason, the party to whom the identity was essential will have the right to terminate the agreement (or the agreement will automatically be terminated depending on how the parties have stipulated the clause). Most straightforward is the agreement executed with an independent contractor. In case the agreement is executed intuitu personae, the contractor will not be able to transfer any of his obligations and as a rule will not be able to subcontract any of the obligations to a third party subcontractor without permission from his contracting party. It is however also possible to name people within a company in the contract, though this is less common. You could for instance contract with a company because you believe in the leadership of its CEO or because the head of R&D has an excellent track record. When starting a joint venture you could write into the contract that the entire project hinges on that head of R&D spearheading the project. When this person would then leave the company, the other company might lose interest in continuing the project and may want to have the option to walk away from it. The latter kind of intuitu personae clause is obviously rather risky for the party that covenants that a certain employee or contractor will remain part of the project as they cannot force that person to stay with the company.
Special Case. In this section, we consider a special case of the general problem discussed in the previous sections. This special case arises when the channel inputs and outputs and the sources form Markov chains as: Also, we constrain a special condition to the channel such that (X1, X2)−Y1 −Y3, (X1, X2)−Y2 −Y3, S1 −S3 −S2. subject to the constraints: I(U1; S1|U2, S3) ≤ I(V1; Y3|V2), I(U2; S2|U1, S3) ≤ I(V2; Y3|V1), I(U1, U2; S1, S2|S3) ≤ I(V1, V2; Y3), for random variables taking values in sufficiently large finite sets according to the distributions: p1(u1, u2, s1, s2, s3) = p(u1 |s1 )p(u2 |s2 )p(s1, s2, s3), p1(v1,v2,x1,x2,y1,y2,y3)=p(v1)p(v2)p(x1|v1)p(x2|v2)p(y1,y2,y3|x1,x2). The proof of Theorem 1 is given in Appendix I. Here, the sketch of the proof is given. To derive this inner bound, a part of the keys between the users is generated by using the source common randomness and the other part is generated by exploiting the channel common randomness. For this purpose, we impose the separation strategy as in [4] to the GDMMAC. At the first part of secret key sharing, users 1 and 2 generate secret keys using source observations. To share these keys with user 3, some information should be sent by users 1 and each of the channel inputs can be specified with access to the receiver’s channel output and the other transmitter’s input or in other words: | |
