Steel. The 230kV portion of the substation will be a low profile (non-lattice), rigid bus, and air-insulated arrangement with flexible connections to all equipment. Equipment support structures will be designed by working stress method in accordance with AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) guidelines for specification, engineering, design, and construction.
Steel a) M.S Bars (Plain and deformed)
Steel. Steel used in the building to be of "ISI" mark reputed.
Steel a. The wholesale trade in products made of steel by whatever process and of any alloy, worked or unworked, such as bars, sections, strips, plates and sheets, whether profiled or not, strip steel, wire, moulded products, tubes, pipes, tube and pipe accessories and fittings, and any other semi-finished steel products, with the exception of the wholesale trade in scrap metal.
Steel. All steel is to be supplied with an accompanying material test certificate from an ILAC or ACRS approved test laboratory that demonstrates compliance to AS1163, AS1594, AS3678 or AS3679. Please supply on receipt of Purchase Order Compliant Material Test Certificates or Certificates of Compliance in accordance with relevant Australian Standards via email to xx@xxxxxxx.xxx.
Steel. Steel required for fabrication of wagons which can be procured direct from the Steel Plants in wagons loads will be procured by the President of India direct from the steel plants to the extent of the ceiling for all categories of steel specified in Annexure-V and will be supplied to contractor at their works siding, if one exists, failing which to the nearest rail head station open for booking. For the items of steel, out of the quantity specified in Annexure-V referred to above, which cannot be procured from the main producers or by allocation releases from Railways Buffer Stock. Director Railway Stores (I&S), Railway Board, Kolkata will authorize the contractor, on behalf of the President of India, within the ceiling referred to therein, for their procurement from other sources and the responsibility for the procurement of such items of steel shall rest entirely on the contractor. Cost will be paid by the President of India on their receipt in contractor’s works on production of a certificate from the Officer of Inspection and Liaison Organization of RDSO, as per clause 3.3 (c)
Steel. PPI Industry Data Code 3312, “Steel Product Manufacturing from Purchased Steel”, Database Series ID: PCU33123312;
Steel. As per actual. Note :- If cement, Steel, Bitumen, C.I.& D.I.Pipes are supplied on Schedule “A”, then respective component shall not be considered. Also if particular component is not relevant same shall be deleted. 1. Formula for Labour Component : V1 = 0.85 P x K1 x L1 - Lo 100 Lo Where, V1 = Amount of price variation in Rupees to be Allowed for Labour component. P = Cost of work done during the quarter under consideration Minus the cost of Cement, HYSD and Mild Steel, bitumen,C.I. & D.I. Pipes calculated at the basic star rates as applicable for the tender, consumed during the quarter under consideration. The Star Rates for the following items shall be as under 1. Cement .. Rs 6000/0 Per M.T 2. Steel TMT(Fe 415) Rs.51000/- Per M.T. 3. Maxphalt (VG30) Rs. 49558/- Per M. T. 4. Pipe – Rs. 3620/- Per R.M.T. K1 = Percentage of labour component as indicated above. Lo = Basic consumer/price index for Nagpur Centre shall be average consumer price index for the quarter preceding the month in which the last date prescribed for receipt of tender falls. L1 = Average Consumer Price Index for Nagpur Centre for the quarter under consideration. 2. Formula for Materials Component : V2 = 0.85 P x K2 x M1 - Mo 100 Mo Where, V2 = Amount of price variation in Rupees to be allowed for Materials component. P = Same as worked out for labour component. K2 = Percentage of material component as indicated above. Mo = Basic wholesale price index shall be average wholesale price index for the quarter preceding the month in which to the last date prescribed for receipt of tender falls. M1 = Average wholesale price index during the quarter under consideration. 3.
Steel. Where any material reveals problems, MCG shall initiate its internal measures to detect and identify the Non-Conformity, such as dimensional, mechanical, chemical and visual testing which shall be the basis for the Non-Conformity Report (NIQ).
Steel. There, appellant taxpayers argued that bilateral agreements involving the creation of an 6 administrative body had historically been submitted to Congress for approval. U.S. Steel, 434 8 practice “may simply reflect considerations of caution and convenience on the part of the 9 submitting States.” Ibid. The Court continued: “These other Compacts are not before us. We 10 have no occasion to decide whether congressional consent was necessary to their constitutional 11 operation, nor have we any reason to compare those Compacts to the one before us.” Id. at 12 471 n.24. 13 The same reasoning is equally applicable here. The various agreements that the Motion 14 discusses, which were presented to Congress and either approved or disapproved, are not before 15 this Court. And while the United States may summarily characterize those agreements as “far 16 lesser,” Motion at 23:24, the Motion does not attempt to conduct any comparison to the 17 Agreement. Nor should it, since U.S. Steel definitively rejected the relevance of any such 18 “comparison test” under the Compact Clause. 19 To illustrate how absurd the United States’ position is, for every “lesser” agreement that 20 was presented to Congress, one might identify an equally “greater” agreement that was not. As 21 just one illustration, in 2003 Kansas reached an agreement with Cuba providing that Cuba would 22 purchase $10 million in goods from Kansas in exchange for Kansas lobbying to repeal federal 23 trade and travel sanctions against Cuba. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Unpacking the Compact Clause, 24 88 Tex. L. Rev. 741, 741-42 (2010). This agreement, wherein a state agreed to represent the 25 interests of a hostile foreign power before the U.S. Government, was not presented for 26 congressional approval under the Compact Clause. Ibid. By the Plaintiff’s flawed reasoning, this 27 agreement and the many others like it indicate that the Agreement therefore “unquestionably” 28 lacks the indicia of a binding compact. Motion at 24:4-5. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected the 1 relevance of such evidence for good reason. U.S. Steel, 434 U.S. at 471.
