Staff Review Process for Captain Sample Clauses

Staff Review Process for Captain the ten (10) highest rated Captain candidates, after the results of the assessment center as defined in Section 24.7(b), will be placed in an eligibility pool and advanced to the staff review phase. There will be a staff review of the candidates in the Captain eligibility pool for each promotion to Captain, except as defined later in this section. During the staff review phase, the eligibility pool will be evaluated by seven or more sworn members of the command staff. The command staff is comprised of all existing Majors and Deputy Chiefs. Completed standardized resumes will be required to be submitted to the candidates’ division and/or bureau commanders prior to the staff review and will be reviewed for authenticity by the candidates’ chain of command. Division and/or bureau commanders will be required to submit the candidates’ resumes to the Director of Training prior to the staff review. In the event of a tie, Section 10.2 of the contract will determine placement in the pool. The following selection criteria for the staff review phase has been established to provide structure to the process, thereby allowing staff to recommend in rank order by scores achieved in the process, the best six (6) candidates to the Chief of Police for each captain promotion. The Chief can choose anyone from the list and is not required to choose the top scoring candidate. The criteria to be considered in the staff review phase may include, but not be limited to the following: - An oral review board - A review of the candidates’ resumes - Attendance records (leave sheets) When multiple Captain vacancies exist at the time of a Staff Review, or exist within 120 calendar days of the most recent Staff Review, an additional review will not be necessary. When multiple vacancies exist at the time of a Staff Review, or exist within 120 calendar days of the most recent Staff Review, Staff will present a ranked list of names to the Chief of Police so the Chief has six names to choose from for each promotion. (Example, if one vacancy exists, the Chief will receive a list of the six best candidates. If two vacancies exists, the Chief will receive a list of the seven best candidates. If three vacancies exist, the Chief will receive a list of the eight best candidates, etc.) Whenever the eligibility list for Captain candidates is six or less, there will not be a Staff Review Process. The remaining names on the list will be forwarded to the Chief of Police in rank order. The Chief can choose...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Staff Review Process for Captain

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Quality Control Program The Contractor shall describe the Quality Control Program in a written document which shall be reviewed by the Engineer prior to the start of any production, construction, or off-site fabrication. The written Quality Control Program shall be submitted to the Engineer for review at least ten (10) calendar days before the start of construction. The Quality Control Program shall be organized to address, as a minimum, the following items:

  • Interview Process Interviews will take place over a period of ninety (90) days. The interviews both of bargaining unit employees and of managers will be conducted jointly by Union/Industry members of the Technical Committee (or designates).

  • Quality Control Plan Within forty five (45) days after the design development documents are approved, the Design-Builder shall develop a quality control plan for the Project (the “Quality Control Plan”). A draft of the Quality Control Plan shall be submitted to the Department and shall be subject to the Department’s review and approval. The Quality Control Plan shall be tailored to the specific products/type of construction activities contemplated by the GMP Basis Documents, and in general, shall include a table of contents, quality control team organization, duties/responsibilities of quality control personnel, submittal procedures, inspection procedures, deficiency correction procedures, documentation process, and a list of any other specific actions or procedures that will be required for key elements of the Work.

  • Scope of Review I conducted my review in accordance with Thai Standard on Review Engagements 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity.” A review of interim financial information consists of making inquires, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with Thai Standards on Auditing and consequently does not enable me to obtain assurance that I would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, I do not express an audit opinion.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.