Additional Review. If the Work-In- Progress requires review by the Fairfax County Architectural Review Board (“ARB”), or by another regulatory entity, then the Resident Curator will prepare required documents in accordance with the governing regulations and submit required documents to the ARB or other applicable regulatory entity for review with a copy to Property Owner. Resident Curator will inform Lessor and Property Owner of any regulatory entity determination(s). In the event of a determination of adverse effect, Resident Curator must follow and fulfill any prescribed mitigation requirements if the Work-In-Progress proceeds as proposed and when such additional regulatory review is required, Work-In-Progress will only be allowed to proceed if Property Owner consents in writing and the ARB or other regulatory entity determines that there will be no adverse effect on the Leased Property’s historic or archaeological resources.
Additional Review. Where the company is requesting the relaxation of a technical requirement, or there are outstanding landowner objections, the application will undergo additional review. In the past, these applications were referred to as “non-routine applications.” The AER will review the application and post it publicly in the same manner as a baseline review application. Outstanding landowner concerns (excluding compensation) may be sent to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) at the AER. Once the 30 day period has lapsed, a decision-maker will determine whether or not the concerns have been rectified or if further ADR or a hearing are required. The AER can assist with dispute resolution through the ADR program at any stage in the lifecycle of the pipeline, even before an application is filed. The goal of ADR is to provide an opportunity for the parties to better understand each other’s interests and develop mutually acceptable solutions through respectful dialogue. To utilize these services, a landowner may call Stakeholder Engagement at the AER at 0-000-000-0000. A licence issued by the AER provides the company with one year to begin construction on a pipeline, though extensions may be considered by the AER on a case-by-case basis. Large projects may be granted a 2 year construction permit. Most right-of-way agreements indicate that the company must pay full fees within a year of signing or the contract expires.
Additional Review. EA may request the ability to submit versions of the Software Title or Online Features at stages of development other than as identified above for review and feedback by Microsoft. Such review is within the discretion of Microsoft and may require the payment of reasonable fees by EA to offset the costs associated with the review of such Software Titles.
Additional Review. 20 In processing the claims covered by the changes set forth in Sections IV and V, an 21 additional level of internal review by a Quality Compliance Consultant (or its equivalent) will 22 occur prior to a claim denial. 23 24 VI.
Additional Review. If a Software Title fails Certification, and if EA has made good faith efforts to address any issues raised by Microsoft, Microsoft will give EA the opportunity to resubmit such Software Title for Certification. Microsoft agrees that the first resubmission for such Software Title is free. For any additional resubmission(s), Microsoft may charge EA a reasonable fee designed to offset the costs associated with testing upon resubmission. EA may request the ability 7 MICROSOFT CONFIDENTIAL to submit versions of the Software Title at stages of development other than as identified above for review and feedback by Microsoft. Such review is within the discretion of Microsoft and may require the payment of reasonable fees by EA to offset the costs associated with the review of such Software Titles.
Additional Review. Without prejudice to paragraph 7.3 of this Clause, the GCF may conduct additional reviews or monitoring to verify that the Services are performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract and the relevant WO concluded hereunder.
Additional Review. A copy of Paragraph 16 shall be delivered to each of the asset manager and the resident manager of the Property within two (2) days after the execution by Seller of this Agreement, with a request to advise Mr. Mendelson within five (5) buxxxxxx xxxx xfter receipt by the asset manager and the resident manager, as the case may be, as to the accuracy and truthfulness of the representations and warranties. Mr. Mendelson shall notify Purchxxxx xx xx xxe response of each of the asset manager and the resident
Additional Review. If the complaint is not resolved to the Customer's satisfaction, the Customer may request formal review by the Company's Vice President.
Additional Review. At the end of any program management cycle, a Member may trigger an Additional Review on any project that has gone through the full project review and selection process and was not selected for funding. After an Additional Review has been triggered, the following steps shall be followed:
Additional Review. If a Software Title fails Certification, and if Publisher has made good faith efforts to address any issues raised by Microsoft, Microsoft will give Publisher the opportunity to resubmit such Software Title for Certification, without charge for the first resubmission. Microsoft may, however, charge Publisher a reasonable fee designed to offset the costs associated with testing for any additional resubmissions. Publisher may request Microsoft’s review and feedback on interim versions of the Software Title. Such review is within Microsoft’s discretion and may require the payment of reasonable fees by Publisher to offset the costs associated with the review of such Software Titles.
