Recall Criteria Sample Clauses

Recall Criteria. A teacher is eligible for recall to a vacant position if the teacher is certified and qualified to fill the position as determined and defined by the District. It is the teacher’s responsibility to maintain his or her certification and to promptly provide documentation of the certification and qualification status to the District. In addition to the posted qualifications, a teacher is not eligible for recall unless (1) s/he was rated Effective or Highly Effective in the most recent year end performance evaluation on record and (2) the teacher has demonstrated recent successful teaching experience in the area, subject or grade of the position for which recall is considered. A teacher rated Minimally Effective is not eligible for automatic recall and must apply for the open position and be considered along with other applicants. Once the District has identified the position(s) in which a vacancy exists, the Superintendent or designee shall issue notice of recall to the vacant position based upon consideration of the effectiveness of each teacher on the recall list who is certified and qualified for the vacant position, with teachers considered to be the most effective recalled first. Teachers shall generally be recalled in inverse order of layoff, as specified earlier in these regulations. Length of service or tenure status shall not be a factor in considering the effectiveness of each teacher. However, if the recall decision involves two or more teachers and all other effectiveness factors distinguishing those teachers from each other are equal, then tenure status shall be considered, with the tenured teacher being recalled before a probationary teacher. If all of the prior factors are otherwise equal, including tenure status, then length of service may be considered as the final tiebreaker. The District has sole discretion to determine the appropriate assignment(s) of recalled teachers.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Recall Criteria

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Promotional Criteria Subject to the utilisation of the skills, as required by the Employer, an employee remains at this level until he/she has developed the skills to allow the employee to effectively perform the tasks required of this function and is assessed to be competent to perform effectively at a higher level or has successfully completed appropriate training to ASF level 1 and has the demonstrated skills to perform at a higher level. An employee must be prepared to undertake appropriate training. LEVEL 3

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of:

  • General Criteria a) Approved varieties shall be those varieties recommended by the Department, the Corporation, or those listed in the Atlantic Provinces Field Crop Guide, Publication 100A.

  • Acceptance Criteria 6.7.2.1. During the test there shall be no evidence of:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.