Periodic Quality Reviews Sample Clauses

Periodic Quality Reviews. Supplier shall develop and implement a process for continuous Product improvement. Buyer may conduct reviews and/or hold meetings related to Supplier's performance under the SOW, including but not limited to the following respects, and may compare Supplier's performance with that of similarly situated suppliers: - Supplier's compliance with delivery dates in support of WAs issued by Buyer; - Supplier's compliance with Emergency Orders issued by Buyer hereunder; - Supplier's compliance with the targeted First Pass Yield (FPY) as described in the product quality plan as described in the appropriate Quality Plan, which is attached as an exhibit to the Product Unique Attachment (hereinafter referred to as, "Product Quality Plan"); - Supplier's compliance with the targeted out-of-box audit (OOB) as set by the Parties in the Product Quality Plan; - Supplier's compliance with the targeted Incoming Product Quality Level (IPQL) as set by the Parties in the appropriate Product Quality Plan on a monthly basis; - Supplier's compliance with the targeted Field Replace Action Level (FRAL) as set by parties in the appropriate Product Quality Plan on a monthly basis; - Percentage of Products failing to function properly upon delivery (also known as the Product DOA rate); - Supplier's speed in taking corrective actions for any problems with Product identified by Buyer; - Supplier's implementation of lessons learned in previous periodic quality reviews. In any calendar month in which Supplier shows poor performance with respect to the criteria set forth above, Buyer may notify Supplier of such poor performance. In such case, Supplier will respond to Buyer with a proposed action plan within [*] of notification by Buyer and such plan shall respond to Buyer's specific concerns and demonstrate Supplier's ability to achieve the required measurements. Supplier's failure to successfully execute an action plan within a mutually agreed upon time frame shall be a material breach of the Agreement. Satisfying any or all criteria of this section shall not relieve Supplier of its warranties or other obligations of the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Periodic Quality Reviews. Strakan shall, or shall ensure that its Contract Manufacturer(s), carry out a periodic Product quality review according to a program agreed between the Parties. A responsibilities checklist is presented as Appendix 4.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Periodic Quality Reviews. The Fixed Asset and Project Accounting Service Center and representatives of management have periodic reviews of the service center performance against agreed upon service level expectations. The agenda for these reviews should include but is not limited to:  service delivery since the last review;  major deviations from service levels;  conflicts or concerns about service delivery, and  planned changes to improve service effectiveness. The Fixed Asset and Project Accounting Service Center will also regularly assess customer satisfaction and will use the results as a basis for changes to this agreement The Fixed Asset and Project Accounting Service Center will have regular meetings with the customer base and will discuss standards of service as necessary. These meetings are scheduled annually and as necessary.
Sample 1
Periodic Quality Reviews. The Accounts Receivable Service Center and representatives of its customer base will conduct periodic reviews of the Service Center’s performance against service level expectations. The agenda for these reviews should include:  Service delivery since the last review  Major deviations from service levels  Service constraints and dependencies since last review, and planned changes to improve service effectiveness  The Accounts Receivable Shared Service Center will also regularly assess customer satisfaction and will use the results as a basis for changes to this agreement. Service Level Agreement Maintenance This Agreement will be reviewed on an ongoing basis and updated. Updates may become necessary due to changing service needs, modifications to existing services, addition of services, or unanticipated events. Issue Resolution
Sample 1

Related to Periodic Quality Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • EMHS Governance, Safety and Quality Requirements 4.1 Participates in the maintenance of a safe work environment.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.