Milestones and Weightings Sample Clauses

Milestones and Weightings. 45.3.1 The Private Party shall from Effective Date to 31 December 2014 (“First Period”) comply with the commitments and undertakings set out in the following table. 2014 Weightings 2014 MILESTONES Indicator Indicators to measure BEE achievement 2014 Milestone Weighting Sub- weighting Target A B C Ownership 20% 13% Percentage share of economic benefits as reflected by direct shareholding by black people 20% 7.0% Community trust ownership 10% Strategic representation 12% 2.5% Black people as a percentage of board of directors 50% 2.5% Black women as a percentage of board of directors 25% 2.0% Local people as a percentage of board of directors 20% 2.5% Black people as a percentage of executive management 50% 2.5% Black women as a percentage of executive management 25% Employment equity 12% 1.0% Black people as a percentage of management 50% 2.0% Black women as a percentage of management 25% 1.0% Local people as a percentage of management 25% 1.0% Black people as a percentage of supervisors, junior and skilled employees 65% 2.0% Black women as a percentage of supervisors, junior and skilled employees 35% 1.0% Local people as a percentage of supervisors, junior and skilled employees 45% 1.0% Black people as a percentage of total staff 75% 1.0% Black women as a percentage of total staff 40%
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Milestones and Weightings. 43.3.1 The Private Party shall from Effective Date comply with the commitments and Element Element Weighting Indicator Measurement Category & Criteria Weighting Points Compliance Targets Bid Offered Score Ownership 26 Voting Rights Exercisable Voting Rights in the entity in the hands of Black People 3 30% Exercisable Voting Rights in the entity in the hands of Black Women 2 15% Exercisable Voting Rights in the entity in the hands of a Local Community Trust 2 10% Economic Interest Economic Interest to which Black Shareholders are entitled 5 30% Economic Interest to which Black women Shareholders are entitled 3 15% Economic Interest to which a Local Community Trust is entitled to 3 10% Net Value 8 As per Codes Score out of 26 Management Control 15 (+2 Bonus) Executive Management Black representation at Executive Management 2 60% Black Female representation at Executive Management 1 30% Local People representation at Executive Management 1 20% Senior, Middle and Junior Management Black representation at Senior, Middle and Junior management 4 60% Black Female representation at Senior, Middle and Junior management 2 30% Element Element Weighting Indicator Measurement Category & Criteria Weighting Points Compliance Targets Bid Offered Score Local People representation at Senior, Middle and Junior Management 2 25% All Employees Black Employees as a percentage of all Employees (excluding Executive Management) 1 75% Black Female Employees as a percentage of all Employees (excluding Executive Management) 1 40% Local People as a percentage of all Employees (excluding Executive Management) 1 60% Bonus Points Number of Black Employees with Disabilities as a percentage of all Employees 2 1% Score out of 15 Skills Development 25 (+5 Bonus) Skills Development Expenditure on any programme specified in the Learning Programme Matrix for Black People as a percentage of the Leviable Amount Skills Development Expenditure on Learning Programmes specified in the Learning Programme Matrix for Black People in any of the following three tourism sub- sectors as a percentage of Leviable Amount: - Accommodation; - Hospitality and related services; - Travel and related services 10 3% Skills Development Expenditure on Learning Programmes specified in the Learning Programme Matrix for Black People with Disabilities in any of the above three tourism sub-sectors as a percentage of Leviable Amount. 9 1.5% Learnerships, Apprenticeships, and Internships Number of Black People participating in ...

Related to Milestones and Weightings

  • Milestones Subject to the provisions of the SGIP, the Parties shall agree on milestones for which each Party is responsible and list them in Attachment 4 of this Agreement. A Party’s obligations under this provision may be extended by agreement. If a Party anticipates that it will be unable to meet a milestone for any reason other than a Force Majeure event, it shall immediately notify the other Parties of the reason(s) for not meeting the milestone and (1) propose the earliest reasonable alternate date by which it can attain this and future milestones, and (2) requesting appropriate amendments to Attachment 4. The Party affected by the failure to meet a milestone shall not unreasonably withhold agreement to such an amendment unless it will suffer significant uncompensated economic or operational harm from the delay, (1) attainment of the same milestone has previously been delayed, or (2) it has reason to believe that the delay in meeting the milestone is intentional or unwarranted notwithstanding the circumstances explained by the Party proposing the amendment.

  • Targets and Milestones Comparing the relative performance of different groups to the over or under- representation within the institution and taking into account our current performance in our Access Agreement milestones, areas for particular focus include: Low Participating Neighbourhoods; Low income groups; Target groups to include gender, disability and care leavers; Black and minority ethnic (BME) group attainment; Completion rates. As a result of the analysis of our performances, our access, success and progression interventions will concentrate on the following: Continuation of involvement in collaborative outreach activity via the KMPF and the Kent and Medway Collaborative Network (KMCNet) as part of the National Network for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO); Recognition of the importance of carefully targeted activity; The use of serial rather than one-off interventions; The importance of long-term outreach to include the whole student lifecycle; The helpfulness of Higher Education Access Tracker (HEAT) for evaluating the impact of interventions; The importance of a whole institution approach; The importance of student attendance monitoring; Ease of access to information and student welfare support; An increasing emphasis on evaluation of activities across the student lifecycle; Accessibility of employability advice and support. Given our relatively strong record to date for widening access and student success, most of the targets seek to maintain, and where possible improve, this performance within a more challenging financial environment. Such targets may be especially challenging and stretching in relation to the access of those from Low Participating Neighbourhoods (LPNs), given the demographic decline in the number of young people (aged 18-21) in the population and the University’s already high recruitment levels from these groups. We have removed the University’s NS-SEC target in response to the UK Performance Indicator Steering Group announcement that HESA will no longer be publishing the NS-SEC indicator after 2016. As we already have LPN and Household Income targets in place we shall not be replacing this target with an alternative. We have reviewed our success targets and added new progression targets for 2017. There was a concern in the institution that our internal reporting did not allow for national and regionally adjusted benchmark comparison. We have therefore made the following adjustments to our success targets: Non-continuation two years following year of entry: part-time first degree entrants – all entrants: Replacing the OFFA agreement target with the similar data from HESA allows for national benchmarking to be undertaken in order to ensure that the University is maintaining its commitment to these students. We aim to keep our non-continuation rate in this area below our HESA benchmark rate. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – mature entrants: Changing the target to clearly focus on mature full-time first degree students (to match the national HESA data) ensures that we focus our efforts on this section of the student population and for the outcomes to be compared with HESA benchmarks rather than internally produced data. We aim to ensure that this student population’s non-continuation rate is at or below the HESA benchmark rate by 2020/21. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – all entrants: In order to ensure that young students are not disadvantaged by the focus on mature entrants, the University will also commit to maintaining the overall non-continuation rate for all students at or below the HESA benchmark. BME: the University will replace the current phrasing of the target around BME success with a more explicit aim of reducing the success gap experienced by BME students. Progression: the University has added a progression target that aims to keep us around or above the sector benchmark for the Employment Indicator from the DLHE survey. Combined targets from the collaborative KMPF project (agreed by all partners) are to raise applications and subsequent conversions to higher education from within the target schools and colleges in LPNs. These targets will need to be reviewed in the coming years to reflect changes to GCSE grading in schools. Our institutional and collaborative targets are included in tables 7a and 7b respectively.

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

  • Targets a) Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer provides refrigerated warehousing and logistic distribution services to clients throughout the United States. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to invest in a new refrigeration and distribution facility in the XxXxxxxxx Park area of Sacramento, California, and hire full-time employees (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the salary of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Project Goals The schedule, budget, physical, technical and other objectives for the Project shall be defined.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.