IE ACTIVITIES Sample Clauses

IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating PG&E’s 2011 solicitation, several tasks were undertaken, both prior to Offer Opening and subsequently. Prior to Offer Opening on June 22, 2011, Xxxxxx performed several tasks to assess PG&E’s methodology for evaluating Offers: • Reviewed the solicitation and its attachments including PG&E’s 2011 Form Agreements and description of the LCBF methodology and criteria. • Examined the utility’s nonpublic protocols detailing how PG&E would evaluate Offers against various criteria. • Attended PG&E’s Bidders’ Conference on May 19, 2011 to evaluate the information provided to potential Participants, and how that information was distributed. • Reviewed the list of registered attendees of the Bidders’ Conference against PG&E’s master list of RFO contacts (used for outreach to potential Participants). 3 CPUC Decision 06-05-039, May 25, 2006, “Opinion Conditionally Approving Procurement Plans for 2006 RPS Solicitations, Addressing XXX Benchmarking Methodology”, page 46. • Reviewed the posting of questions and answers from the Bidders’ Conference on PG&E’s public website to check whether information that was made available in- person to conference attendees was also provided to other potential Participants. • Examined PG&E’s 2011 RFO master contact list; performed an analysis of contacts with respect to industry and technology representation. • Interviewed members of PG&E’s evaluation committee regarding details of the 2011 version of the utility’s LCBF methodology and its inputs. During the period between Offer Opening and PG&E’s development of a final short list for submittal to the CPUC, Xxxxxx’x activities included: • Participating in opening Offers. Xxxxxx observed the opening of each Offer and observed the PG&E team logging in each Offer. The IE took an electronic copy of each Offer package, and independently built a database for tracking Offers. • Reading portions of each Offer. Xxxxxx particularly scrutinized Offers for utility purchase. For PPA Offers, Xxxxxx focused on pricing, collateral, interconnection, permitting, technology, resource assessment, site control, and development and ownership experience descriptions in detail. • Building an independent valuation model and using it to value Offers. This served as a cross-check against PG&E’s LCBF model. The IE model used independent inputs and a different methodology than PG&E’s. It was much simpler and lacked detail and granularity used in the PG&E model. However, the independ...
Sample 1See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating PG&E’s 2012 solicitation, several tasks were undertaken, both prior to Offer Opening and subsequently. Prior to the Offer Opening window of January 29 through February 6, 20134, Xxxxxx performed several tasks to assess PG&E’s methodology for evaluating Offers: • Reviewed the solicitation and its attachments including PG&E’s 2012 Form Agreements and description of the LCBF methodology and criteria. • Examined the utility’s non-public protocols detailing how PG&E would evaluate Offers against various criteria. 3 CPUC Decision 06-05-039, May 25, 2006, “Opinion Conditionally Approving Procurement Plans for 2006 RPS Solicitations, Addressing XXX Benchmarking Methodology”, page 46.
Sample 1Sample 2
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating the renewable energy contract between PG&E and BFP, Xxxxxx performed various key tasks:  Observed (telephonically) negotiations between the parties;  Reviewed drafts of the contract amendment as the parties proposed changes to the initial proposal; and  Performed an independent market valuation of the amendment.
Sample 1
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating the proposed DG Fairhaven contract amendment, several tasks were undertaken. Xxxxxx Seco had performed several of these tasks within its work scope of serving as IE for PG&E’s 2008 and 2009 RPS competitive solicitations; these prior activities were directly relevant to the evaluation of the DG Fairhaven contract amendment.
Sample 1
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating the HLP contract amendment, several tasks were undertaken. Xxxxxx had performed several of these tasks within its work scope of serving as IE for PG&E’s 2011 RPS competitive solicitation; these prior activities were directly relevant to the evaluation of the HLP contract amendment.
Sample 1
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating the renewable energy contract between PG&E and Exelon, Xxxxxx performed various key tasks: • Observed some of PG&E’s prior efforts to sell PCC 1 renewable energy through bilateral negotiations; • Discussed with the PG&E team its plan to hold an e-solicitation to pursue sale of the energy, and suggested possible improvements to its outreach efforts; • Observed (telephonically) negotiations between the parties; • Reviewed marked-up drafts of the confirmation agreement as the parties proposed changes to the underlying form; • Researched comparable transactions for publicly available pricing data. 1 CPUC Decision 06-05-039, May 25, 2006, “Opinion Conditionally Approving Procurement Plans for 2006 RPS Solicitations, Addressing XXX Benchmarking Methodology”, page 46. offering to losing participants to discuss their proposals by telephone, as it does with formal RPS solicitations. Upon notification of the failure of its bid, one of the participants requested feedback about its proposal by e-mail, but to Xxxxxx’x knowledge PG&E did not respond to that request. PG&E’s highly streamlined approach to managing this informal request for bids differed markedly from the utility’s practices with formal solicitations to purchase renewable energy or other products.
Sample 1
IE ACTIVITIES. To fulfill the role of evaluating the new renewable energy contract and pricing amendment to the existing QF contract between PG&E and Wheelabrator Shasta, Xxxxxx performed various key tasks: • Observed (telephonically) negotiations between the parties; • Reviewed drafts of the contracts as the parties proposed changes to initial proposals; and • Performed an independent market valuation of the contracts, and compared them to net market values of other proposals for renewable energy and for biomass-fueled energy using biofuels from high hazard zones.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to IE ACTIVITIES

  • Outside Activities Subject to the Articles of Incorporation and any agreements entered into by the General Partner or its Affiliates with the Partnership or a Subsidiary, any officer, director, employee, agent, trustee, Affiliate or stockholder of the General Partner shall be entitled to and may have business interests and engage in business activities in addition to those relating to the Partnership, including business interests and activities substantially similar or identical to those of the Partnership. Neither the Partnership nor any of the Limited Partners shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement in any such business ventures, interest or activities. None of the Limited Partners nor any other Person shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement or the partnership relationship established hereby in any such business ventures, interests or activities, and the General Partner shall have no obligation pursuant to this Agreement to offer any interest in any such business ventures, interests and activities to the Partnership or any Limited Partner, even if such opportunity is of a character which, if presented to the Partnership or any Limited Partner, could be taken by such Person.

  • Cease Activities Upon receiving a notice of termination of this Grant, Grantee must immediately cease all activities under this Grant, unless Agency expressly directs otherwise in such notice. Upon termination, Grantee must deliver to Agency all materials or other property that are or would be required to be provided to Agency under this Grant or that are needed to complete the Project activities that would have been performed by Grantee.

  • Activities Except with the prior written consent of the Board, Executive will not during his employment with the Company undertake or engage in any other employment, occupation or business enterprise, other than ones in which Executive is a passive investor. Executive may engage in civic and not-for-profit activities so long as such activities do not materially interfere with the performance of his duties hereunder.

  • Program Activities Grantee must use the Grant Funds as set forth in Exhibit A (the “Program”).

  • Eligible Activities 7.1 Subject to the provisions of this Article, the PERFORMING PARTY agrees to complete all Grant Activities as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Contract Documents.

  • Specific Activities Please give detailed information about the specific activities of the Project promoter and the Partner(s), with budget allocations

  • Other Activities Your services pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be exclusive, and you may render similar services and act as an underwriter, distributor or dealer for other investment companies in the offering of their shares.

  • CONCERTED ACTIVITIES 24.1 It is agreed and understood that there will be no strike, work stoppage, slow-down, or refusal or failure to fully and faithfully perform job functions and responsibilities, or other interference with the operations of the District by the Federation, or by any of the Federation's officers, agents, or members during the term of this Agreement, including compliance with the request of other labor organizations to engage in such activity.

  • Restricted Activities The Executive agrees that some restrictions on his activities during and after his employment are necessary to protect the goodwill, Confidential Information and other legitimate interests of the Company and its Affiliates:

  • Required Activities 1. Biometrics measuring blood pressure, weight and height for BMI, fasting cholesterol (total and LDL) and fasting glucose 33% 2. Completion of the online Health Survey 33%

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.