Evaluation Team Sample Clauses
The Evaluation Team clause defines the group of individuals responsible for reviewing and assessing proposals, bids, or submissions in a procurement or selection process. Typically, this clause outlines how the team is formed, the qualifications or roles of its members, and the procedures they must follow during the evaluation. By establishing a clear structure for the evaluation process, this clause ensures objectivity, transparency, and fairness in decision-making, reducing the risk of bias or disputes.
Evaluation Team. A team composed of management and tenured professors that conducts the various elements of the evaluation process.
Evaluation Team. The evaluation team for each unit member shall be composed of three members: the appropriate Vice President or designee; an appropriate tenured peer member; and the manager most closely supervising the employee (who shall be the committee chairperson). The peer member is to be selected by the committee chairperson.
Evaluation Team. When there is reason to believe that a teacher has a communicable disease, an evaluation team shall convene within seven (7) calendar days of the teacher/student identification.
1. The evaluation team shall be comprised of: the teacher’s physician, the school physician, and a physician specializing in infectious diseases.
2. The school physician shall be chairperson of the evaluation team.
Evaluation Team. When the Superintendent is notified that an employee is afflicted with a chronic communicable disease, he/she shall promptly confer with the employee’s primary care physician. If that physician recommends the employee be permitted to remain or return to work, the Superintendent shall convene a medical review team to evaluate the request and make recommendation to the Superintendent. An afflicted employee may be administratively reassigned until the final recommendation of the medical review team is made as outlined below. The medical review team shall consist of (1) the employee’s primary care physician, (2) a physician specializing in infectious diseases, and (3) a physician member of the county board of health or the school physician whom shall serve as chairperson. The medical review team shall review all pertinent data, make further examinations if necessary, and consult with others of their choosing in order to make a report to the Superintendent. The medical review team report shall include a recommendation whether the employee shall be:
a. admitted to work unconditionally;
b. admitted to work under restrictive conditions; or
c. not admitted to work. If the recommendation is either (b) or (c) above, the employee must be:
a. notified of the reasons for that determination;
b. provided with an opportunity for a hearing with representation before the medical review team to provide information as to why the recommendation should be reconsidered. If the recommendation is (b) above and any reassignment or accommodation violates this Agreement, the Board shall meet with appropriate representatives of the Association to negotiate a reasonable accommodation. The medical review team may reconvene at the request of any member or the Superintendent at a later time to evaluate the employee’s condition and work status. This shall follow the same procedure as in the original review process. The Superintendent shall make his/her decision after receiving the recommendation of the medical review team. The District will assist other public agencies in providing information from the National Health Centers for Disease Control, the Ohio Department of Health, and the Ohio Department of Education. One of the purposes of this program is to reduce fear based upon erroneous information or a lack of information. The educational program allows for the dissemination of new information as it becomes available.
Evaluation Team. The unit member shall select a peer evaluator from inside or outside the unit member's division, provided that when the last preceding peer evaluation was conducted it was by a peer from within the unit member's division, and provided that there is a peer evaluator available from within the unit member’s division. This peer evaluator and the administrative evaluator shall comprise the evaluation team.
Evaluation Team. The team shall be comprised of an administrative evaluator and a peer evaluator.
Evaluation Team. A multi-state Sourcing Team will be responsible for the review and evaluation of Proposal in accordance with the process described in the RFP. The Lead State may engage additional qualified individuals during the process to assist the Evaluation Team in understanding technical, financial, legal, contractual, or program matters
Evaluation Team. 17.9.1 The evaluation team shall consist of the supervisor and two (2) tenured bargaining unit members; one selected by the bargaining unit member undergoing evaluation and the other selected by the supervisor in the following order of preference: the designated program coordinator; the department chair; other tenured faculty member.
17.9.1.1 If the bargaining unit member being evaluated does not provide a name to the supervisor within two (2) weeks of notification of evaluation, the second member of their team will be appointed by the bargaining unit member’s supervisor.
17.9.2 The supervisor is the team leader and shall be responsible for communications between the bargaining unit member and the team, assigning evaluation workload to team members, ensuring compliance with process and timelines, distributing and gathering forms, coordinating meetings, and submitting the final report to the vice president.
17.9.3 The evaluation team shall conduct its evaluation in confidence. Team members shall not discuss a bargaining unit member’s performance with anyone not directly involved in the process.
Evaluation Team. An Evaluation Team will be composed of representatives from the Departments of Energy, Advanced Education and Technology (AERI), Environment, Sustainable Resource Development, Treasury Board and Finance and Enterprise. The Evaluation Team may request independent external experts to provide expert evaluation and advice on a confidential basis. The Evaluation Team will review all FPPs in detail, meet with project proponents as necessary, and prepare recommendations to the Governance Committee.
Evaluation Team. The unit member shall be evaluated by the Evaluation Team which consists of one permanent faculty peer which is selected by the member, the Chair, and an administrator (typically the supervising ▇▇▇▇). For areas that do not have a Chair, the area Coordinator will serve in place of the Chair. The unit member may provide the administrator a list of three potential peer evaluators by the deadline listed below. The peer evaluators must be specialists in the subject area in which the unit member teaches or is assigned or in a subject area reasonably related to that in which the unit member teaches or is assigned. The Chair may not also serve as the peer evaluator. Where no permanent faculty meet the criteria, the unit member may propose probationary peers. The administrator, in consultation with the Chair, will select one (l) peer evaluator from this list. If the unit member fails to submit this list by the deadline the administrator, in consultation with the Chair, will select the peer evaluator. All those selected as peer evaluators must be willing to serve.