General Deal Structure. Describe general characteristics of contract, for example:
General Deal Structure. The Project is a 78.2 MW wind facility. The Project will interconnect to the CAISO controlled transmission system. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator. There is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: Montezuma Winds II Birds Landing, CA Expected to produce 201 GWh average per year over contract term
General Deal Structure. The PPA is for 60 MW with an option for PG&E to increase the capacity to 100 MW (for additional details, see Confidential Appendix D). The PPA arose from bilateral negotiations between enXco and PG&E. The Project will interconnect to the CAISO. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator. There is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: Shiloh III Wind Birds Landing, CA Expected to produce 205 GWh per year over the contract term for a 60 MW project and 345 GWh per year over the contract term for a 100 MW project
General Deal Structure. The PPA was executed as a result of bilateral negotiations. PG&E will be receiving the full output from this Project. As discussed above, the Project will interconnect to the CAISO-controlled grid. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Expected to produce 8 GWh average per year over the contract term
General Deal Structure. The Project is a 60 MW solar PV project. The Project will interconnect to the CAISO. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator. There is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: North Star Solar, LLC Mendota, CA Expected to produce 119 GWh average per year over the contract term
General Deal Structure. The Project consists of a 150 MW solar PV facility. The Project will interconnect to the CAISO controlled transmission system, or will be dynamically transferred to the CAISO via a pseudo-tie. Sempra will be the scheduling coordinator and there is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. Further details are contained in Confidential Appendix A. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: Copper Mountain Solar 2 Boulder City, NV Expected to produce 303 GWh average per year over contract term
General Deal Structure. The Project is the 50.5 MW contract executed as a result of PG&E’s 2005 RPS Solicitation. Bottle Rock Power LLC is owned by USRG and Riverstone Holdings. As discussed above, the Project is already interconnected to the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”). PG&E will become the scheduling coordinator. There is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. The figure below depicts the delivery structure of the Bottle Rock transaction: Figure 1: Amended and Restated PPA Delivery Structure PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy RPS Seller: Bottle Rock Power LLC Cobb, CA Expected to produce 420 GWh average per year over contract term
General Deal Structure. The 250 MW PPA was executed as a result of the 2007 RPS Solicitation. The Project will interconnect to the CAISO at the Xxxxxx Substation 220 kV bus until the Transmission Network Upgrades are placed into service, at which time the Project will interconnect to the CAISO at the Water Valley Substation (formerly referred to as the Xxxxxx Lake Substation or the Xxxxxxxx Substation) located at the Project site. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator for the Project and there is no firming and shaping associated with this deal. Figure 1: PPA Delivery Structure Seller: Mojave Solar San Bernardino County, CA Expected to produce approximately 617 GWh average per year over contract term Buyer: PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy 2 The PPA was executed over 18 months from the close of PG&E’s 2007 RPS Solicitation. Consistent with Resolution E-4199, PG&E used the 2009 MPR established in Resolution E-4298 and the XXX factors associated with that solicitation year for comparison. Further details are included in the AMF calculations in Confidential Appendix D for further details.
General Deal Structure. The Project consists of 22 wind turbines, 3 MW each for a total combined capacity of 66 MW and a total annual production of approximately 175,000 MWhs. The original agreement was executed on September 15, 2009, as a result of bilateral negotiations and amended on April 18, 2011. Under the PSA, PG&E is purchasing all RECs associated with the Project’s generation. TransAlta is operating its newly completed Summerview 2 wind facility in Alberta, Canada (the “Facility”). TransAlta is delivering energy generated from the Facility into the Alberta Power Pool using a California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”)- approved meter. TransAlta’s generation is being recorded in Western Renewable Energy Generation Information System (“WREGIS”) with its CEC-issued RPS identifier and one REC will be created in TransAlta’s account for each MWh of metered generation. Delivery occurs when TransAlta transfers RECs from its account to PG&E’s WREGIS account. As discussed below in Section II.E., current CEC delivery requirements do not appear to apply to REC-only transactions, and SBX1 2 has eliminated delivery requirements for RECs. Nonetheless, out of an abundance of caution, in the transition period until implementation of SBX1 2, PG&E will associate these RECs with energy that it imports into California at the rate of one REC per MWh. The CEC verification process will ensure that the number of RECs generated and sold to PG&E corresponds to meter data at the Facility generating facility and that the same RECs are not sold to any other entity. XxxxxXxxx informed PG&E that it has already committed to sell the brown energy associated with the RECs that PG&E is purchasing under the PSA. Figure 1: PSA Delivery Structure RPS Seller: TransAlta Corporation Summerview2, Alberta, Canada Expected to produce 175,000 RECs average per year over the contract term PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible RECs from Summerview2 wind facility
General Deal Structure. Under the Amended PPA, the point of interconnection for the Project will be on the WAPA Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx #2 230 kv transmission line, and the delivery point will be WAPA’s Xxxx Substation. The Project will be connected to the CAISO through a Pseudo Participating Generator Agreement (“Pseudo-Tie Agreement”). An order accepting the Pseudo-Tie Agreement was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) on August 9, 2011.3 Under the Pseudo-Tie Agreement, the Project will connect to the CAISO and will be scheduled by PG&E at the CAISO designated PNode as if it were operating in the same manner as any other generating facility located within the CAISO balancing authority area. The Pseudo-tie E Tag will show CAISO generation, a CAISO export into the Western Area Lower Colorado’s (“WALC”) control area, a leg of WALC transmission to get to the Xxxx Intertie, and then an import into the CAISO at Xxxx. PG&E will be the scheduling coordinator for deliveries under the Amended PPA. There is no firming and shaping associated with this transaction. Figure 1 below provides a summary of the delivery structure of the Amended PPA. 1 Information about RETI is available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xx.xxx/reti/. 2 Should refer to the maximum price under the contract. 3 See Letter Order dated August 9, 2011 in FERC Docket No. ER11-3778-000; see also Letter Order dated August 9, 2011 in FERC Docket No. ER11-3779-000 accepting Interconnected Balancing Authority Operating Agreement between the CAISO and WAPA to facilitate Pseudo-Tie Agreement. Figure 1: Delivery Structure of Amended PPA4 RPS Seller: Rice Solar Delivers at Xxxx Substation; Project expected to generate 448 GWh per year over the term of the contract PG&E Purchases RPS-eligible energy at Xxxx Substation
