Procurement Review Group Participation Sample Clauses

Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Department of Water Resources, Union of Concerned Scientists, The Utility Reform Network, the California Utility Employees, and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer. The A&R PPA was discussed at a PRG meeting on December 13, 2011. Additional information is provided in Confidential Appendix A.
Sample 1See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procurement Review Group Participation. On February 8, 2011, PG&E presented its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) with a description of the proposed transaction. Further discussion is included in Confidential Appendix B. 6 PG&E’s 2009 RPS Plan, p. 4.
Sample 1
Procurement Review Group Participation. PG&E first presented the Project with its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) on October 8, 2010. Further discussions took place during the March 8, 2011, and May 17, 2011, PRG meetings. PG&E addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A.
Sample 1
Procurement Review Group Participation. PG&E informed its Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) of the PPA on June 11, 2010 and again on August 13, 2010. PG&E addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A. The PRG for PG&E includes representatives of the California Department of Water Resources, the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Union of Concerned Scientists, The Utility Reform Network, the California Utility Employees, and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer.
Sample 1
Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA”), the Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the California Utility Employees (“CUE”), Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), Union of Concerned Scientists (“UCS”), and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer. On October 21, 2009, this transaction was presented to the PRG as part of the shortlist offer from the 2009 RPS Solicitation. The Project was subsequently presented to the PRG as part of the regular RPS update on April 9, 2010; June 24, 2010; August 13, 2010; and October 8, 2010, as a priority transaction. No objections were raised by members of the PRG. PG&E further addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix A.
Sample 1
Procurement Review Group Participation. The Procurement Review Group (“PRG”) for PG&E includes the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), Union of Concerned Scientists (“UCS”), The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”), the California Utility Employees (“CUE”), and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E ratepayer. The PRG was informed of the Original PPA on August 14, 2009, and of the Amended PPA on July 20, 2011, December 1, 2011, and December 13, 2011. Additional information concerning the PRG response to the Amended PPA is provided in Confidential Appendix A.
Sample 1
Procurement Review Group Participation. The PRG for PG&E consists of: California Department of Water Resources, the Commission’s Energy Division and Division of Ratepayer Advocates, The Utility Reform Network, the California Utility Employees, and Xxx Xxxx, as a PG&E xxxxxxxxx. While the PRG was briefed on projects resulting from the 2007 RPS Solicitation since the initial short list was presented to the PRG on July 16, 2007, PG&E informed its PRG of the Original PPA on August 14, 2009. The PPA was presented to the PRG on May 17, 2011. PG&E further addresses PRG feedback in Confidential Appendix D.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Procurement Review Group Participation

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Procurement Plan 8. The Borrower shall update the Procurement Plan as needed throughout implementation of the Project, and on each anniversary of the Effective Date, the Borrower shall in consultation with ADB determine whether the Procurement Plan needs to be updated. The Borrower shall implement the Procurement Plan in the manner in which it has been approved by ADB.

  • Document Review The Company and the Executive hereby acknowledge and agree that each (i) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (ii) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement, (iii) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial and other advisors as it or he has deemed appropriate in connection with their respective execution of this Agreement, and (iv) has executed this Agreement voluntarily and knowingly.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.