Facility Reviews Sample Clauses

Facility Reviews. We may review your facility in accordance with any provision for review set out in the Facility Details (or, if no such provision is specified, annually), or at any time if there is or may be, in our opinion, a change of credit. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Facility Reviews. We may conduct a review of your facility at any time. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
Sample 1Sample 2
Facility Reviews. The Purchaser or its designee shall have the right, upon reasonable advance written notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by the Supplier for production of the Products solely to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Regulatory Xxxxxxxxx, XXX00000, and any applicable successors to those ISO requirements. Supplier shall reasonably cooperate with Purchaser and its designee with respect to such inspections. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then the Purchaser shall provide written notice of such fact, which notice shall contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps the Supplier should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies. Any inspection made by the Purchaser under this section shall occur no more frequently than once each calendar quarter (unless otherwise required by law, including by direction of the Regulatory Authority) and shall be designed to cause the least amount of disruption to the operations of the Supplier as is reasonably possible. Such inspections shall be limited to the manufacture of Products, and shall not include any trade secrets or other confidential information unless the Purchaser and its designee (if applicable) has signed a confidentiality agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Supplier.
Sample 1Sample 2
Facility Reviews. You must only use the money for the purpose set out in the Facility Details. We may review your facility in accordance with any provision for review set out in the Facility Details (or, if no such provision is specified, annually) or at any time if there is or may be, in our opinion, a change of credit. If we ask you to, you must attend at an interview, and give us any documentation we ask you for.
Sample 1Sample 2
Facility Reviews. A facility review of this directive shall be conducted at least annually.
Sample 1Sample 2
Facility Reviews. MAKO will have the right, upon reasonable advance notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by PDEX for production of the Product to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the prevailing Regulatory Authority, and EN ISO 13485, and any applicable successors to those EN requirements. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then MAKO will provide written notice of such fact, which notice will contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps PDEX should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies.
Sample 1
Facility Reviews. MAKO Surgical will have the right, upon reasonable advance notice and during regular business hours, to inspect the facilities being used by Service Provider for production of the EPIK to confirm that such facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of this Agreement, the prevailing Regulatory Authority, and EN ISO 13485, and any applicable successors to those EN requirements. If any such inspection reveals that the manufacturing facilities do not satisfy such requirements, then MAKO Surgical will provide written notice of such fact, which notice will contain in reasonable detail the deficiencies found in the manufacturing facilities and, if practicable, those steps Service Provider should undertake in order to remedy such deficiencies.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Facility Reviews. (a) Orthovita shall have the right to audit the Facility prior to the final delivery of the Collagen Lots provided that reasonable notice is given.
Sample 1

Related to Facility Reviews

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall:

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Environmental Review (a) Buyer shall have the right to conduct or cause a consultant (“Buyer’s Environmental Consultant”) to conduct an environmental review of the Assets and Seller’s records pertaining to the Assets (as set forth in Section 3.01) prior to the expiration of the Examination Period (“Buyer’s Environmental Review”). The cost and expense of Buyer’s Environmental Review, if any, shall be borne solely by Buyer. The scope of work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review shall not include any intrusive test or procedure without the prior written consent of Seller. Buyer shall (and shall cause Buyer’s Environmental Consultant to): (i) consult with Seller before conducting any work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review, (ii) perform all such work in a safe and workmanlike manner and so as to not unreasonably interfere with Seller’s operations and (iii) comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any Third Party consents and otherwise cooperate with Buyer in conducting Buyer’s Environmental Review and any activities related thereto. Seller shall have the right to have a representative or representatives accompany Buyer and Buyer’s Environmental Consultant at all times during Buyer’s Environmental Review. With respect to any samples taken in connection with Buyer’s Environmental Review, Buyer shall take split samples, providing one of each such sample, properly labeled and identified, to Seller. The Parties shall execute a “common undertaking” letter regarding the confidentiality for the Environmental Review where appropriate. Buyer hereby agrees to release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Seller from and against all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, causes of action and judgments of any kind or character (INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING FROM SELLER’S SOLE, JOINT, COMPARATIVE OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY) to the extent arising out of Buyer’s Environmental Review. Buyer hereby covenants and agrees that it will have at least $2,000,000 of general liability insurance to cover its indemnification hereunder prior to the commencement of the Environmental Review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.