Evaluator completes Final Written Evaluation. At the conclusion of the yearly evaluation cycle, evaluation results shall be used by the employee’s evaluator, in accordance with RCW 28A.405.100, to judge the CISS’s performance as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. A CISS who is rated unsatisfactory in one or more components shall result in an unsatisfactory evaluation. By May 1, CISS in the first year of employment with the District shall receive their completed Comprehensive Binary performance evaluation. By June 1, all other CISS on the Comprehensive Binary Evaluation cycle shall receive their completed evaluation. The evaluation should reflect the quality of performance based on the evidence collected by both the CISS (through artifacts) and the evaluator (through observation). In the Comprehensive Binary Evaluation process, CISS are evaluated on all four domains of the Framework for Teaching for Certificated Instructional Support Staff. The CISS signs the Comprehensive Binary Evaluation; copies are filed with the CISS, evaluator, and District’s Human Resource office. The CISS member’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the CISS may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence and artifacts are not submitted with the report to the District’s Human Resources Department.
Evaluator completes Final Written Evaluation. At the conclusion of the yearly evaluation cycle, evaluation results shall be used by the employee’s evaluator, in accordance with RCW 28A.405.100, to judge the employee’s performance as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. An educator who is rated unsatisfactory in one or more components/elements shall result in an unsatisfactory evaluation. (See MISD Evaluation Process for Unsatisfactory Educators, Appendix C) By May 1st, educators in their first year of employment with the Xxxxxx Island School District shall have a complete, written Initial Long Form performance evaluation. By June 1st, all other educators on the Initial Long Form Evaluation cycle shall have their evaluation completed. The evaluation should reflect the quality of performance based on the evidence collected by both the educator (through artifacts) and the evaluator (through observation). In the Initial Long Form Evaluation process, educators are evaluated on all four domains of the Framework for Teaching. The educator signs the Long Form evaluation; copies are filed with the educator, administrator, and MISD Human Resource office. The educator’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the educator may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence is not submitted with the report to the MISD Human Resources Department.
Evaluator completes Final Written Evaluation. At the conclusion of the yearly evaluation cycle, evaluation results will be used by the employee’s evaluator to judge the employee’s performance as satisfactory or unsatisfactory in accordance with RCW 28A.405.100. An educator who is rated unsatisfactory in one or more Domain(s) will receive an unsatisfactory evaluation (See MISD Evaluation Process for Unsatisfactory Educators, Appendix C). By June 1st, educators on the Fifth Year Long Form Evaluation cycle shall have their evaluation completed. The narrative should reflect the quality of performance based on the evidence collected by both the educator (through artifacts) and the administrator (through observation). The educator signs the Fifth Year Long Form evaluation; copies are filed with the educator, administrator, and MISD Human Resources office. The educator’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed with the educator, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the educator may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence is not submitted with the report to the MISD Human Resources Department. After successful completion of the Fifth Year Long Form Evaluation cycle the educator will return to the Professional Growth Cycle.
