Written Evaluation definition
Written Evaluation means a written report prepared by the administrative/supervisory staff member or members responsible for the supervision of that staff member.
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s Supervising Administrator shall formally 1777 evaluate the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Self-Evaluation 1778 Performance Review form.
1779 a. Each non-tenured faculty member may be evaluated once in each of the years 1780 taught on contract. The completed written evaluation must be returned to the 1781 non-tenured faculty within five (5) weeks of the observation.
1782 b. Supervising Administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual 1783 agreement, the annual goals of non-tenured faculty. 1784 c. For tenured faculty, a formal evaluation will take place at least once every three 1785 (3) years during a major term or during the Summer Term if on full-time status. 1786 The completed written evaluation will be returned to the faculty member within 1787 five (5) weeks of the observation.
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or vice president shall formally evaluate the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Evaluation Performance Review form.
a. Each non-tenured faculty member may be evaluated up to twice a year in each of the semesters taught on contract. The completed written evaluation must be returned to the non-tenured faculty within five (5) weeks of the observation.
b. Supervising administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual agreement, the annual goals of non-tenured faculty.
c. For tenured faculty, a formal evaluation will take place at least once every three (3) years during a major term or during the Summer Term if on full-time status. The completed written evaluation will be returned to the faculty member within five (5) weeks of the observation.
d. The faculty member’s performance will be considered “Satisfactory” for that evaluation period if the supervising administrator elects not to evaluate a faculty member as required by this contract.
e. The overall evaluation process shall result in an evaluation as either “Unsatisfactory”, “Acceptable but needs improvement”, “Satisfactory”, or “Outstanding”.
Examples of Written Evaluation in a sentence
The employee will be provided with an Interim Written Evaluation and a final review during the probationary period.
Written Evaluation by Management The parties agree that the timely and objective evaluation of the work performance of employees is a valuable and necessary activity for both the Employer and employee.
Written Evaluation: The Superintendent shall complete the annual written evaluation of Assistant Superintendent not later than June 15, 2013.
Written Evaluation No later than May 10 a written evaluation will be given to the employee and a conference will be held to review the evaluation.
Stage II – Written Evaluation GOS will evaluate each qualified Submission on the basis of the rated criteria as set out in Appendix A.
The completed Written Evaluation from sixty (60) days before the end of the Probationary Period shall be signed by both parties and will become part of the Employee´s employment file.
Section A— Written Evaluation The evaluation of the work of paraprofessionals is the exclusive responsibility of the assigned administrators.
An immediate supervisor may require an annual evaluation of specific teachers if the teachers received four (4) or more “needs to improve” rating on the previous year’s Summative Written Evaluation Report.
Summative Conference by March 15 and Written Evaluation by March 30 of year two.
Creation of Written Evaluation Plan for addressing the effectiveness of programs and services funded by CCF Capacity Building Program.
More Definitions of Written Evaluation
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s Supervising Administrator shall formally evaluate 2171 the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Self-Evaluation Performance Review 2172 form in the Appendices.
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s supervising administrator or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall formally evaluate the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Evaluation Performance Review form.
a. For all non-tenured faculty members, the first evaluation of a faculty member shall occur within the first two-thirds of each term of an academic year.
b. Each non-tenured faculty member may be evaluated up to twice a year in each of the semesters taught on contract. The completed written evaluation must be returned to the non-tenured faculty within five (5) weeks of the observation.
c. Supervising administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual agreement, the annual goals of non-tenured faculty.
d. For tenured faculty, a formal evaluation will take place at least once every three
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s supervising administrator shall formally evaluate the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Self-Evaluation Performance Review form.
a. The completed written evaluation must be returned to the non-tenured faculty within five (5) weeks of the observation.
b. Supervising administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual agreement, the annual goals of non-tenured faculty.
c. For tenured faculty, a formal evaluation will take place at least once every three (3) years during a major term or during the Summer Term if on full-time status. The completed written evaluation will be returned to the faculty member within five (5) weeks of the observation.
d. The faculty member’s performance will be considered “Satisfactory” for that evaluation period if the supervising administrator elects not to evaluate a faculty member as required by this contract.
e. The overall evaluation process shall result in an evaluation as either “Unsatisfactory”, “Acceptable but needs improvement”, “Satisfactory”, or “Outstanding”.
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s Supervising Administrator shall formally evaluate the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Self-Evaluation Performance Review form in the Appendices.
a. Non-tenured faculty will be evaluated once in each of the years taught on contract. The completed written evaluation must be returned to the non- tenured faculty within five (5) weeks of the observation.
b. Supervising Administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual agreement, the annual goals of non-tenured faculty.
c. For tenured faculty, a formal evaluation will take place at least once every three
Written Evaluation. The faculty member’s Supervising Administrator shall formally evaluate 2222 the faculty member’s performance using the Faculty Self-Evaluation Performance Review 2223 form in the Appendices.
2224 1. Evaluation frequency: Non-tenured faculty will be evaluated once per year until the 2225 awarding of tenure and tenured faculty will be evaluated following the Faculty 2226 Evaluation Intent subsection.
2227 2. The completed written observation must be returned to faculty member within five 2228 (5) weeks of the observation.
2229 3. Supervising Administrators and the faculty member will determine, by mutual 2230 agreement, the professional development goals.
2231 4. The overall evaluation process shall result in an evaluation as “Unsatisfactory,” 2232 “Acceptable but Needs Improvement,” or “Satisfactory.”
2233 a. A faculty member’s performance will be considered “Satisfactory” for that 2234 evaluation period if the Supervising Administrator elects not to evaluate a 2235 faculty member as required by this contract.
2236 b. Where appropriate, the Administration will identify any deficiencies and 2237 provide suggestions, professional development opportunities, or otherwise 2238 assist the faculty member with any necessary correction or remediation. In 2239 completing the Faculty Self-Evaluation and Performance Review, the 2240 Supervising Administrator shall complete the appropriate sections of the 2241 form to ensure the following: 2242 1. Notification to the faculty member if deficiencies exist that require 2243 correction. 2244 2. Explanation of any deficiencies as noted and the expected 2245 improvement. 2246 3. Administrative assistance needed to enable improved performance. 2247 4. The time frame established to demonstrate improvements.