Donor Coordination Sample Clauses

The Donor Coordination clause establishes procedures and expectations for how multiple donors will collaborate and communicate within a project or funding arrangement. It typically outlines mechanisms for sharing information, aligning funding priorities, and avoiding duplication of efforts among donors, such as through regular meetings or joint reporting requirements. This clause ensures that donor contributions are effectively managed and harmonized, reducing inefficiencies and promoting a unified approach to achieving project objectives.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Donor Coordination. There are two primary donors working on maintenance related work on the SRN: the Asian Development Bank and DFID. MCC will coordinate its technical assistance efforts under the Compact, to the extent possible, to reinforce these technical assistance efforts.
Donor Coordination. The due diligence for the tax administration aspects of the Revenue Administration Reform Project was undertaken in close cooperation with the IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Division as well as with the World Bank’s National Program Supporting Tax Administration Reform program to support tax reform efforts in the Philippines. The outlines of the eTIS sub-Activity and its emphasis on process redesign and training are based on long-standing recommendations that have been made by the IMF and World Bank to the BIR. It is anticipated that the tax administration advisors provided to the BIR under the Compact will be sourced through the IMF and coordinated by a resident IMF advisor in Manila, the Philippines. The Automated Audit Tools sub-Activity builds on the previous efforts of the Swedish International Development Agency and the World Bank. Both donors have sponsored pilot programs in the utilization of automated audit tools.
Donor Coordination. Throughout the multi-year development of the Compact, MCC and the Government have engaged in an inclusive process that included consultations with the United States Government, Nepali communities and key private sector actors, non-government actors, and other donors as well as multilateral organizations. In particular, MCC worked closely with the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank in reviewing and agreeing on various power sector reforms required in Nepal for future programming by the two banks. MCC also consulted frequently with the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (“DFID”) during its preparation of a political economy analysis of power sector reform.
Donor Coordination. MCC worked closely with the World Bank on issues of targeting and impact evaluation strategy over the course of project development in 2009. As of January 2010, the World Bank intends to provide an additional loan to expand KC1. The World Bank and MCC plan to continue close collaboration during and beyond the scope of this additional funding and share lessons learned with each other and with DSWD as KALAHI-CIDSS continues to mature and develop towards a potential national expansion that could involve many other donors. MCC will also be joining DSWD’s donor forum related to KALAHI-CIDSS.
Donor Coordination. The Secondary National Road Development Project is anchored on preliminary work undertaken with the assistance of Japan Bank for International Cooperation (now known as the Japan International Cooperation Agency), which was instrumental in identifying viable priority road segments eligible for MCC investments. MCC has coordinated closely with the World Bank on the ongoing efforts in: (i) road sector reform; (ii) improving the adequacy of the “Special Road Support Fund” (as described below);
Donor Coordination. While DFC shall appraise, oversee and monitor ACFD Project activities, MCC and the Government expect to work closely with DFC during all phases of the ACFD Project from identifying activities to developing, designing and implementing such activities.
Donor Coordination. The Property Rights Project builds upon a variety of other donor’s efforts. Most notably, the Property Rights Project makes use of the results of ADB’s “Cadastral Survey and Land Registration Project” that has mapped many land parcels slated for privatization and currently is developing a land information system to which the State Registry will supply information on legal rights to land. Moreover, the design of the Peri-Urban Land Leasing Activity is informed by, among others, past efforts of the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank, and complements an ongoing project being implemented by the Government, the Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Food and Agriculture Organization to improve efficiencies in the dairy system.
Donor Coordination. The Enterprise Development Project complements other donor supported projects, including projects by EBRD, IFC, World Bank, USAID and USDA. The goal and structure of the GRDF is significantly different from those of other donor-supported investment activities. The GRDF will be encouraged to work with other donorsfinancial institutions to attract capital and expertise to the SME sector in the Regions, especially to businesses in which such institutions may have been reluctant to invest in the absence of the GRDF in Georgia. The ADA is uniquely focused on rural household economic growth and will be reinforced by current activities that xxxxxx economic growth in agriculture. Specifically, Enterprise Development Project synergies with key U.S. agencies and other donors are as follows:
Donor Coordination. As with the rest of this Compact, the Off-Grid Electricity Access Project has and will continue to benefit from coordination among the Parties and other donors. In particular, GIZ and Stichting Nederlandse Vrijwilligers have been working with private sector actors (including large businesses such as the cellular services provider MTN Benin and small, independent businesses that sell household solar products) to develop market-driven, sustainable solutions for off-grid electrification. In developing the Off-Grid Electricity Access Project, MCC benefited from discussions with these and other donors and entities.
Donor Coordination. Many donors are funding activities related to climate change, renewable energy and natural resources management in Indonesia. In order to coordinate those efforts, BAPPENAS chairs the Indonesia Climate Change Coordinating Forum consisting of the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, USAID, Norway, Germany, Japan International Cooperation Agency, the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) and other donors. MCC has engaged with members of that Forum and has designed the GP Project with the Government to be a model that could be replicated by other donors in other provinces. Since the Government agreed to pursue a project in the green prosperity theme in July 2010, MCC has conducted extensive consultations with donors involved in low carbon development in Indonesia, including AusAID, Norway, Germany, the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development, Asian Development Bank, United Nations Development Programme and World Bank. In addition, a number of international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), notably those engaged in REDD+ readiness and REDD+ pilot projects in Indonesia, have provided their insights into working at the field level. The GP Project design incorporates key lessons learned from these donors’ experiences, most notably the importance of focusing efforts at the district level and integrating low carbon activities in the planning phase and implementation phase within those districts. In addition, the GP Project builds on the extensive gains made by the Government, with support from international donors, in developing low carbon laws, regulations and plans and to assist in the decentralization effort. The GP Project’s approach to spatial planning, technical assistance and funding facility creates a framework for collaboration in provinces and districts where there is geographical overlap with other donors.