Correctional Case Records Analyst Workload Committee Sample Clauses

Correctional Case Records Analyst Workload Committee. (Unit 1) The State and the Union agree to continue the Joint Labor/Management Committee to review the Correctional Case Records Analyst workload, mandatory overtime and training. The State and the Union shall each be entitled to select a maximum of five (5) representatives. The Co-Chairs of the Joint Committee shall be one individual selected by the Union and one (1) individual selected by the State. The State and the Union shall select its own representatives. Upon mutual agreement, subject matter experts may be invited to attend the meetings and contribute to the discussions. Committee members and employee subject matter experts shall serve without loss of compensation. The Committee shall meet at a minimum of at least once per quarter. The Committee by mutual agreement shall determine its meeting schedule, ground rules and agenda. The Co-Chairs shall finalize the agenda a minimum of fourteen (14) days in advance of the meeting. The Union shall provide the State with any information requests a minimum of fourteen (14) days in advance of the meeting. The State shall respond to the information requested before each scheduled meeting date. The Committee members shall discuss and make recommendations on the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Correctional Case Records Analyst Workload Committee

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Problem Statement School bus fleets are aging, and our communities have poor air quality. Replacing school buses with zero emission school buses will address both of these issues.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Red Hat Directory Server Use Cases Subscription Services are provided for Red Hat Directory Server only when used for its supported Use Case in accordance with the terms of this Exhibit and Table 3.1 below.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.