Theory of Reasoned Sample Clauses

Theory of Reasoned. Action (TRA) / Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) The Theory of Reasoned Action, developed by Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx (1980) is premised on the belief that the immediate predictor of behaviour is a behavioural intention. Behavioural intentions depend on a person’s attitude toward that behavior and the values of others (Figure 7). Attitudes capture beliefs about behavioural outcomes (behavioural beliefs) combined with an evaluation of the outcomes of such behaviour (outcome evaluation). Subjective norms refer to received social pressures to behave in a certain way and motivation to comply with the wishes of others. The TRA was not specifically designed to model food choice, but it has been used extensively for this purpose. For instance, XxXxxxxx et al. (2003) use the TRA to model beef consumption in Ireland. They found that both attitudes and subjective norms to be important determinants of behavioural intentions and that behavioural intention correlated significantly with their behaviour measurement. Other studies, applying the TRA to food choice, have also found significant correlations between the main components of the model (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx, 1990). Belief about outcomes Evaluation of outcomes Attitude Behavioural Intention Behaviour Normative beliefs Subjective Norm Motivation to comply Figure 5 Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) Source: adapted from Ajzen and Xxxxxxxx, (1980). However the TRA was developed only to model purely volitional behaviour, in other words cases where successful performance of the behaviour required only the formation of an intention to perform that behaviour (Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx, 2006). To address cases of incomplete volitional control, Ajzen (1988) developed the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The TPB extends the TRA by incorporating an additional construct, perceived behavioural control (PBC), which is regarded as a determinant of both behavioural intensions and behaviour (Figure 8). PBC incorporates both internal control factors (information, skills and abilities) and external control factors (dependence on others / situational factors). Therefore under the TPB, intentions, in turn, are influenced by three major factors: − Whether the person is in favour of doing the specific behaviour (attitude toward the behaviour), − How much the person feels social pressure to do it (subjective norm), − Whether the person feels in control of the action in question or self-efficacy in relation to the behaviour (perceived behavioural cont...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Theory of Reasoned

  • Right to Appeal Notwithstanding a determination by any forum listed in Section VI.D above that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification with respect to a specific Proceeding, the Indemnitee shall have the right to apply to the court in which that Proceeding is or was pending, or to any other court of competent jurisdiction, for the purpose of enforcing the Indemnitee’s right to indemnification pursuant to this Agreement. Such enforcement action shall consider the Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification de novo, and the Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of a prior determination that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification. The Company shall be precluded from asserting that the procedures and presumptions of this Agreement are not valid, binding and enforceable. The Company further agrees to stipulate in any such judicial proceeding that the Company is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement and is precluded from making any assertion to the contrary.

  • Decision The decision by the arbitrator shall be rendered within thirty (30) days after the close of the hearing. Decisions by the arbitrator in cases properly before him shall be final and binding upon the parties, subject, however, to the limitations of arbitration decisions as provided by the P.E.L.R.A.

  • Expedited Appeal An Appeal of a review of continued or extended health care services, additional services rendered in the course of continued treatment, home health care services following discharge from an inpatient Hospital admission, services in which a Provider requests an immediate review, or any other urgent matter will be handled on an expedited basis. An expedited Appeal is not available for retrospective reviews. For an expedited Appeal, Your Provider will have reasonable access to the clinical peer reviewer assigned to the Appeal within one (1) business day of receipt of the request for an Appeal. Your Provider and a clinical peer reviewer may exchange information by telephone or fax. An expedited Appeal will be determined within the earlier of 72 hours of receipt of the Appeal or two

  • Arbitration Award All arbitration awards shall be final and binding as provided by Section 42 of the Trade Union Act. An arbitrator may not alter, modify or amend any part of this Agreement, but shall have the power to modify or set aside any unjust penalty of discharge, suspension or discipline imposed by the Employer on an Employee.

  • Right to Grieve Disciplinary Action Employees shall have the right to grieve written censures or warnings, and adverse employee appraisals. Employees shall have the right to rebut in writing any disciplinary notice and that rebuttal will be placed in the employee file, but will not be part of the formal disciplinary record. Should an employee dispute any such entry in his/her file, he/she shall be entitled to recourse through the Grievance Procedure and the eventual resolution thereof shall become part of his/her personal record.

  • DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL 6.8.1 The following principles are to be followed when dealing with disciplinary matters:

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.

  • Finality Any matters relating to the current contract term, whether or not referred to in this Agreement, shall not be open for negotiation during the term of this Agreement.

  • Arbitrator Selection The arbitrator will be appointed by the Administrator in accordance with the rules of the Administrator. However, unless the parties agree otherwise, the arbitrator must be a retired or former judge or a lawyer with at least ten (10) years of experience.

  • Agreement Objectives The parties agree that the objectives of the Agreement are to facilitate:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.