Standard of Review. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.
Standard of Review. Except as provided in Sections 7.4 and 12.6, this Agreement shall not be amended, modified, terminated, discharged or supplanted nor any provision hereof waived, unless mutually agreed in writing by the Parties. Except as provided in Section 12.6, the rates, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement are not subject to change under Sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act, absent the written agreement of the Parties to change any provisions. Other than as expressly permitted in this Agreement, the standard of review for any changes proposed by a Party, a non-party, or the FERC, acting sua sponte, shall be the “public interest” application of the “just and reasonable” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 000 X.X. 000 (1956) and Federal Power Commission v.
Standard of Review. In the event that a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification, any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 7 shall be conducted in all respects as a de novo review on the merits and Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of that adverse determination under Section 5.
Standard of Review. The standard of review for any modifications to this Agreement requested by a Party will be subject to the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Mobile Gas Service Corporation, 000 X.X. 000 (1956), and Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, 000 X.X. 000 (1956). See also Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Capital Group Inc. v.
Standard of Review. By adopting the Project Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare. Accordingly, City shall not use its discretionary authority in considering any application for a Subsequent Approval to change the policy decisions reflected by the Project Approvals or otherwise prevent or delay development of the Project as set forth in the Project Approvals. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed tools to implement those final policy decisions and shall be issued by City so long as they comply with this Agreement and Applicable Law, as defined below, and are not inconsistent with the Project Approvals as set forth above, and meet the intent and comply with any City adopted Designed Guidelines, as applicable. To the extent permitted by law, City shall not use its discretionary authority in considering these Subsequent Approval applications to revisit or frustrate the policy decisions or material terms reflected by the Project Approvals. Developer agrees that development under this Agreement shall comply with provisions reflected in Uniform Codes (whether building, fire, plumbing, or other applicable uniform codes) which may adopted subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement.
Standard of Review. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Serv. Co., 000 X.X. 000 (1956) and Federal Power Comm’n v. Sierra Pac. Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956). Each Party agrees that if it seeks to amend any applicable power sales tariff during the Term, such amendment shall not in any way materially and adversely affect this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party. Each Party further agrees that it shall not assert, or defend itself, on the basis that any applicable tariff is inconsistent with this Agreement.
Standard of Review. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22)
Standard of Review. Any document, writing or instrument required or ------------------ permitted to be delivered to Bank under this Agreement shall be deemed satisfactory only if approved by Bank in the exercise of its sole discretion, and any act or approval permitted to be done by Bank under this Agreement shall be in Bank's sole discretion. Where in this Agreement reference is made to Bank's discretion", or "sole-discretion", said reference shall mean that with respect to the matter so designated, Bank shall have the absolute right to make decision with respect to the matter so designated shall not be subject to any standard of good faith, fair dealing, reasonableness, or any other standard implied by any court or imposed by law, it being the intention of the parties that the decision of the Bank with respect to said matter shall be absolutely final and binding.
Standard of Review. The standard of review for the Grievance Panel is whether the University violated a specific provision(s) of this Agreement.
Standard of Review. Absent the agreement of all Parties to the proposed change, the standard of review for changes to any rate, charge, classification, term or condition of this Agreement, proposed by a Party (to the extent that any waiver in subsection 11.2 below is unenforceable or ineffective as to such Party), or FERC acting sua sponte, shall solely be the “public interest” application of the “just and reasonable” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 000
