Means of Verification. Under this column, Chief Directors are to indicate the means by which the various targets indicated would be verified. Chief Directors are to note that these indicators would constitute the basis on which targets undertaken would be assessed during the evaluation exercise. Risks/Assumptions Chief Directors are to delineate the circumstances under which the delivery of set targets may be compromised. These may include, but would not be limited to, targets requiring collaboration with stakeholders and resource constraints.
Means of Verification. Amendments drafted.
Means of Verification programmes developed and applied. All children and juveniles in custody and in contact with probation services managed through individual development plans based on psychological and educational assessment, agreed with the juvenile and his/her family. Means of verification: number of the individual development plans for juveniles. Opportunity created for juveniles in conflict with the law to participate in apprenticeship/employment schemes. Means of verification: number of juveniles trained/employed on the basis of the apprenticeship/employment schemes. Recruitment of juvenile probation counsellors with psychology and social assistance background according to the approved plan. Means of verification: number of staff recruited and trained. Effective complaints system for pre-trial and sentenced juveniles and independent monitoring mechanism expanded and operational nationally. Means of verification: Report from independent experts.
Means of Verification. Under this column, Chief Directors are to indicate the means by which the various targets indicated would be verified. Chief Directors are to note that these indicators would constitute the basis on which targets undertaken would be assessed during the evaluation exercise. Risks/Assumptions Chief Directors are to delineate the circumstances under which the delivery of set targets may be compromised. These may include, but would not be limited to, targets requiring collaboration with stakeholders and resource constraints. SCHEDULE 2: GENERAL OPERATIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DELIVERABLES KEY RESULT AREA 1: PERFORMANCE REPORTING This Schedule focuses on the Chief Director carrying out a given generic set of deliverables aimed at facilitating the smooth running of the sector Ministry. All the deliverables under these KRAs are rooted in the legislative framework that governs the operations of the Civil Service and have been grouped into six (6) broad Key Results Areas (KRAs).
Means of Verification. The pieces of information (documentary evidence) which shows that the standards set by the indicators have been achieved. Risk Assumption: Events that are likely to have adverse impact on output and outcomes.
Means of Verification. D3.1 MS6 Options for mushroom production understood and economic viability as a business enterprise defined 2 18 Means of verification: D4.1, 4.2 Schedule of relevant Milestones Milestone number 59 Milestone name Lead benefi- ciary number Delivery date from Annex I 60 Comments MS7 Options for use of root crop peels for animal feed. determined 6 18 Means of verification: D4.4, 4.5 MS10 Options for development of other higher value products from wastes defined 5 24 Means of verification: D4.7 and 4.9 MS12 Commercial opportunities for cassava and yam defined 4 24 Means of verification: Annual progress reports towards deliverables 3.5 and 3.6 MS14 Dissemination of best strategies for reducing losses in fresh yam in Ghana and Nigeria identified 7 30 Means of verification: D2.6 MS15 Demonstration of production of yam flour in Ghana and Nigeria completed 7 30 Means of verification: Deliverables associated with WP6 MS17 Demonstration of processing options and waste product strategies completed 6 33 Means of verification: D6.3 MS18 Demonstration of selected waste production strategies with SMEs 6 33 Means of verification: D6.4 Project Number 1 289843 Project Acronym 2 Gratitude One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP2 Type of activity 54 RTD Work package title Reduced Post-Harvest Losses of Fresh Produce Start month 2 End month 35 Lead beneficiary number 55 7 Objectives The objective of this WP is to reduce losses in the fresh yam value chain and hence improve food security and increase incomes with a focus on small-holder farmers. In parts of West Africa 10-50% of tubers are lost during on-farm storage (Amusa et al., 2003) and a further 10-40% during transport due to damage and rots (Xxxx and Xxxxxxxx, 2003). Technologies for the reduction of post-harvest losses of fresh yam will be developed and validated. This will focus on practices to control tuber sprouting, water loss and rotting which are major causes of loss.Losses on-farm could be reduced by improved storage structures and post-harvest practices to reduce sprouting and improve wound-healing. This would also provide tubers of better quality to withstand damage during transport. The specific objectives are: • Develop and validate strategies to improve curing of yam tubers. • Develop and validate strategies for yam tuber sprout control. • Identify appropriate storage structures to optimise tuber quality/storage. Best strategies identified will be demonstrated in WP6 and information more widely d...
Means of Verification. D3.1 MS8 Post-harvest characteristics of key yam varieties 1 20 Means of verification is Deliverable 2.2 MS13 Package of best strategies for on-farm yam storage defined for intervention 7 28 Means of Verification: Annual progress reports leading to deliverables 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 Project Number 1 289843 Project Acronym 2 Gratitude One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP3 Type of activity 54 RTD Work package title Alternative Market Development to Reduce Post-Harvest Losses Start month 2 End month 35 Lead beneficiary number 55 12
Means of Verification. D3.1 MS9 Innovations in cassava (yam) drying defined. 6 20 Means o Verification: Deliverable 3.4 MS11 Food safety strategies defined 3 24 Annual Progress Report MS12 Commercial opportunities for cassava and yam defined 4 24 Means of verification: Annual progress reports towards deliverables 3.5 and 3.6 MS15 Demonstration of production of yam flour in Ghana and Nigeria completed 7 30 Means of verification: Deliverables associated with WP6 MS17 Demonstration of processing options and waste product strategies completed 6 33 Means of verification: D6.3 MS19 Dissemination of technologies capable of reducing post-harvest losses to SME's completed 1 34 Means of verification: Final Project Report Project Number 1 289843 Project Acronym 2 Gratitude One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP4 Type of activity 54 RTD Work package title Adding Value to Waste Products Start month 4 End month 35 Lead beneficiary number 55 2
Means of Verification. D3.1 MS6 Options for mushroom production understood and economic viability as a business enterprise defined 2 18 Means of verification: D4.1, 4.2 MS7 Options for use of root crop peels for animal feed. determined 6 18 Means of verification: D4.4, 4.5 MS10 Options for development of other higher value products from wastes defined 5 24 Means of verification: D4.7 and 4.9 MS11 Food safety strategies defined 3 24 Annual Progress Report Project Number 1 289843 Project Acronym 2 Gratitude One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP6 Type of activity 54 DEM Work package title Demonstration of Technologies with Beneficiaries Start month 6 End month 35 Lead beneficiary number 55 6
Means of Verification. EMP updated; use by BMA and other key migration actors of the EMP and other analytical products and services as migration policy and management tools A 2.2 Enhance capabilities of One Stop Shop (OSS) for documentation of foreigners Reporting coordinators: MoI 1. Development of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels. Means of verification: Revised and updated concept of One-Stop Shop for documentation of foreigners approved; needs assessment of OSS carried out and endorsed; BMA website developed and upgraded including versions in several languages and with dedicated sections for each type of migrant/purpose of stay/migration to Moldova. 1. Consolidation of capabilities of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels. Means of verification: OSS premises in Chisinau, Balti and Comrat refurbished; equipment procured and installed; staff capacities enhanced. 1. Ensure operational functionality of OSS for documentation of foreigners at central and regional levels in line with European standards and best practices. Means of verification: OSS fully operational; ‘on-the-spot’, mobile and online services provided. A 2.3 Ensure operational mechanism for combating irregular migration Reporting coordinators: MoI 1. Development of inland detection and expulsion capabilities. Means of verification: Policy and regulatory framework amended in line with European standards and best practices; needs assessment of dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and Centre for Temporary Detention of Foreigners (CTDF) carried out and endorsed. 1. Consolidation of inland detection and expulsion capabilities. Means of verification: Equipment procured and installed for dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and CTDF; staff capacities enhanced; cooperation with Border Police ensured. 1. Ensure effective inland detection and expulsion mechanism. Means of verification: Dedicated units for combatting illegal migration and CTDF operational in accordance with European standards and best practices. A 2.4 Ensure operational system for integration of foreigners, refugees and beneficiaries of humanitarian protection Reporting coordinators: MoI, MLSPF 1. Creation of Integration Centres for foreigners (ICF) and Integration Centres for refugees and beneficiaries of humanitarian protection (ICR). Means of verifications: Policy and regulatory framework amended in line with European standards and best practices; needs assessment of ICF a...
