JRC Decision Making Sample Clauses

JRC Decision Making. 2.4.1 Each Party’s representatives of the JRC shall have collectively one (1) vote. All decisions of the JRC shall be made whenever possible by unanimous vote.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
JRC Decision Making. The JRC will take action by unanimous vote with each Party having a single vote, irrespective of the number of representatives actually in attendance at a meeting, or by a written resolution signed by all of the designated representatives of each of the Parties. If the JRC is unable to reach unanimous consent on a particular matter within [*****] (unless otherwise agreed) of its initial consideration of such matter, then the matter will be referred to the Executive Officers (or their respective designees; provided, however, that each such designee is not a member of the JRC and occupies a position senior to the positions occupied by the applicable Party’s members of the JRC) of the other Party for resolution. If the Executive Officers are unable to resolve a dispute pursuant to section 3.6 after good faith negotiations (not to extend beyond [*****] unless otherwise agreed), such issue will be decided consistent with [*****].
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
JRC Decision Making. Each Party’s JRC representatives will collectively have a single vote, and the JRC will operate by unanimous consent of all JRC members present and in accordance with the principles set forth in Section 4.1. The JRC will not have any authority or jurisdiction to amend, modify, or waive compliance with this Agreement, any of which shall require mutual written agreement of the Parties. If a dispute arises between the Parties’ JRC representatives, the matter will be first referred to the Liaisons for resolution. If the Liaisons are unable to resolve the dispute, then the matter will be elevated to the Chief Executive Officer of Ideaya, the Director of the CRUK-MI on behalf of Manchester and the Director, Business development of CRT (or, in either case, a direct report of such individual). If these three (3) individuals are unable to resolve the dispute, then, subject to the last sentence of this Section 4.1(c), Ideaya will have the final decision, so long as such decision does not conflict with the terms of the Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no decision by Ideaya will: (i) require CRT or Manchester to breach any obligation or agreement that Institute may have with or to a Third Party prior to the Effective Date; (ii) require CRT or Manchester to perform any activities that are materially different or greater in scope than those provided for under the Agreement; or (iii) amend, modify, or waive CRT’s or Manchester’s compliance with, this Agreement, any of which shall require mutual written agreement of the Parties; or (iv) impose or increase any financial burden on CRT or Manchester (other than any financial obligations expressly set forth in this Agreement).
Sample 1Sample 2
JRC Decision Making. All decisions of the JRC shall be unanimous, with the representatives of Metabasis on the JRC collectively having one vote and the representatives of Roche on the JRC collectively having one vote. If the JRC is unable to decide or resolve unanimously any matter properly presented to it for action, then at the written request of either party, the issue shall be referred to Metabasis’ head of research and development and Roche’s [***] who shall attempt in good faith to resolve such issue as promptly as practicable. If such officers are unable to resolve such issue within [***], then at the written request of either party, the issue shall be referred to the Chief Executive Officer of Metabasis and Roche’s [***]. If such officers are unable to resolve such issue within [***] of commencing such negotiations, then, except as provided in Section 1.3, the resolution and/or course of conduct shall be determined by [***]. However, [***] will give [***] to [***], and [***] to [***] in [***] or [***]. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, [***] the [***] with [***] this [***] shall [***]:
Sample 1
JRC Decision Making. The JRC shall determine, approve or resolve Committee Matters within the authority of the JRC by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives on the JRC collectively having one (1) vote. If the JRC representatives of the Parties do not reach consensus as to a particular Committee Matter within [***] days after such matter is first presented to the JRC, after reasonable discussion and good faith consideration of each Party’s comments, then:
Sample 1
JRC Decision Making 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)

Related to JRC Decision Making

  • Decision Making All decisions of each Committee shall be made by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote. If after reasonable discussion and good faith consideration of each Party’s view on a particular matter before a Committee, the representatives of the Parties cannot reach an agreement as to such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter was brought to such Committee for resolution or after such matter has been referred to such Committee, such disagreement shall be referred to the JSC (in the case of disagreement of the JRDC), the JEC (in the case of disagreement of the JSC), or the Chief Executive Officers of Miragen and the Chief Executive Officer of Servier or its designee (the “Executive Officers”) (in the case of disagreement of the JEC) for resolution. If the Executive Officers cannot resolve such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter has been referred to them, then [*] that is the subject of the dispute [*]. For clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], [*] will not be obligated to [*] and [*]. For further clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], neither Party shall be obligated to [*] and [*]. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision and any provision to the contrary, [*] shall have the final say with respect to any decision which involves [*] (including, by way of example, [*], whether [*], or whether [*]), and neither Party shall be obligated to [*] on account of [*] for which [*] has exercised such final say unless [*] agreed on by the JSC, JEC or Executive Officers and [*]. [*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker. (If the parties mutually agree, insert the name, address and other contact information of the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect.) « » « » « » « »

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Major Decisions (a) any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion of the ownership of the Property or the exercise of any other remedies with respect to the Loan;

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.