Final Review Certify Criteria Sample Clauses

Final Review Certify Criteria. Final review is a manual queue process. VDOT has specific requirements regarding the quality of the image that is selected for the violation notice. The business rule governing this is that the image must be a recognizable image of the vehicle (preferably in color). The intent of the quality control is to provide reasonable assurance that the recipient of the notice will be able to recognize their vehicle. This image must be readable to the extent that we can recognize the vehicle and identify the plate characters. If the plate characters are not perfectly clear or we cannot recognize more than four (4) of the characters we can certify as long as we have an ROI image that is clearly from the same vehicle with an irrefutable image of the plate characters. If a suitable image is not available within the group of images on file for the notice, we will send the entire group of images to reclassify.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Review Certify Criteria. Final review is a manual queue process. VDOT has very specific requirements regarding the quality of the image that is selected for the violation notice. The business rule governing this is that the image must be a clear image of the vehicle profile (preferably in color). This image must be readable to the extent that we can identify the make of the vehicle and clearly identify the plate characters. If the plate characters are not perfectly clear, we can certify if there is an ROI image that is clearly the same plate with an irrefutable image of the plate characters. If a suitable image is not available for the group of images available for the notice, we send the entire group of images to reclassify.
Sample 1

Related to Final Review Certify Criteria

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Cost of Additional Review The Design Professional shall be responsible for an initial and one subsequent review of the Submittal. Where the subsequent Submittal is not accepted due to noncompliance with the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall be responsible for payment for the additional time required by the Design Professional to complete the Submittal review.

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.