Family Court Sample Clauses

Family Court. As has been mentioned in previous submissions, the provision of interpreting services in the family courts (from direct feedback provided by a magistrate in the North West) is not of sufficient quality in the eyes of an experienced magistrate with long established familiarity in the use of interpreters. This dissatisfaction is not with the linguistic abilities of the interpreters presenting in the courtroom. It is more a case of his appreciating that the interpreters being called to serve are insufficiently prepared to handle the non-verbal demands of managing the unique dynamics of a family court setting. In terms of the continuous professional development opportunity relevant here, this lack of excellence will be corrected by offering this magistrate or other professionals in the field the opportunity to work with an academic specialist to design and deliver a course, delivered in person or on-line, that will educate interpreters on how to carry out assignments in these circumstances to the satisfaction of the court and the public. This course will be designed and delivered by external parties contracted and funded by Applied Language Solutions. Interpreters who will be working in the family courts will be required to complete the course and will also be required to pay a modest sum to cover the cost. In compensation, the meta-tagging system detailed elsewhere will include them when requests for family court cases are received. They will get the work and re-coup their investment promptly. At the same time, interpreters who chose to refrain from working in family court settings for personal reasons are tagged to preclude them from being called on. In addition the company will provide a steady stream of relevant legal information collected by field-based staff and key customer leads which will be delivered through online means to the interpreters. This information will be delivered through a learning management system which will confirm that they have received and reviewed the information. It is also hoped that particularly committed operational staff working within the collaborative partners will take up the opportunity to deliver training directly to the interpreters giving them guidance on their professional expectations during interpreting episodes. This content would also be delivered online or in face-to-face settings. Other methods of justice-specific training will be delivered by:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Family Court

  • THE COURT’S FINAL APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

  • THE COURT’S FAIRNESS HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • Attending Court 20.1 An employee who loses time by being required, in a case in which the Company is involved, to attend court or coroner's inquest, or to appear as a witness, shall be paid for time lost. If no time is lost, such employee shall be paid for actual time held, with a minimum of four (4) hours at one and one-half (1 1/2) times his/her hourly rate.

  • Appearance in Court When an employee is required by the Employer to appear in any court or before any attorney for the purpose of testifying because of any accident he/she may have been involved in during working hours, the employee shall be reimbursed in full by the Employer for all time spent or hours of work lost, computed at his/her current hourly rate of pay, whichever is greater, because of his/her appearance.

  • Courts The parties agree that the State and Federal courts in The City of New York shall have jurisdiction for purposes of enforcement of their agreement to submit Disputes to arbitration and of any award of the Arbitrator.

  • MAGISTRATE’S COURT JURISDICTION The Parties hereto consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrates' Court in terms of Section 45 read with Section 28 of the Magistrates’ Court Act of 1944 as amended. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, this shall not preclude either Party from approaching the High Court of South Africa for any relief sought. This Agreement shall further be governed in terms of the law of the Republic of South Africa.

  • Bankruptcy Court Approval (a) Sellers shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain Bankruptcy Court approval of the Sale Order which, among other things, will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law (i) finding that this Agreement was proposed by the parties in good faith and represents the highest and best offer for the Purchased Assets; (ii) finding that Purchaser is a good faith purchaser under Section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code and that the provisions of Section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code have not been violated; (iii) authorizing and directing Sellers to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement and sell only the Purchased Assets to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement and Sections 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, free and clear of all Encumbrances (including any and all “interests” in the Purchased Assets within the meaning of Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code), other than the Assumed Liabilities and the Permitted Encumbrances, such that Purchaser shall not incur any liability as a successor to the Business; (iv) authorizing and directing Sellers to execute, deliver, perform under, consummate and implement, this Agreement, together with all additional instruments and documents that may be reasonably necessary or desirable to implement the foregoing; (v) finding that Purchaser is not a successor in interest to Sellers or otherwise liable for any Retained Liability, (vi) finding that Purchaser’s acquisition of the Purchased Assets and assumption of the Assumed Liabilities does not reflect a significant continuity of the business of Sellers and permanently enjoins each and every holder of a Retained Liability from commencing, continuing or otherwise pursuing or enforcing any remedy, claim or cause of action against Purchaser relative to such Retained Liability; (vii) finding that the sale of the Purchased Assets does not constitute a sub xxxx plan of reorganization; and (viii) directing Sellers, at the direction of the Purchaser, to immediately consummate the sale of the Purchased Assets without awaiting the expiration of any applicable time period for appealing the Sale Order.

  • The City of Milwaukee, by its Milwaukee Board of School Directors, shall pay the Contractor for the full and complete performance of the work, the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00/100 ($365,500.00) as provided in the General Conditions of the Contract.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!