Expert Review Sample Clauses

Expert Review. 3.3.1 This Clause 3.3 only applies where the Base Access Charge elements and/or any other changes to this Schedule are referred to an expert for review pursuant to Clause 3.2 of this Schedule 3.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Expert Review. 2.3.1 This Clause 2.3 only applies where the Base Access Charge elements, TOP Charges methodology and/or any other changes to this Schedule are referred to an expert for review pursuant to Clause 2.2 of this Schedule 3. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Sample 1
Expert Review. If the Buyer is purchasing an Item based in whole or in part on its stated provenance, designer or creator, the Buyer may at its option and at its own cost arrange with the Seller to have Buyer’s selected expert review the Item prior to purchase. Selection of the expert is the sole responsibility of the Buyer. Any arrangements for inspection shall be made between the Buyer and Seller. Buyer expressly acknowledges that the Buyer’s use and/or reliance on any expert is at the Buyer’s own risk and cost.
Sample 1
Expert Review. Formatted: Font: Bold, Not All caps
Sample 1
Expert Review. The Expert shall determine, on the same basis and using the same principles and methods as are obligatory for the preparation of the Closing Accounts and the resulting I/SP Adjustment Amount and Merial Adjustment Amount according to this Agreement, and only with respect to the items of the SP Objection or the SA Objection not accepted or waived in writing by either Sanofi-Aventis or Schering-Plough, whether and to what extent either the Notified I/SP Adjustment Amount and Notified Merial Adjustment Amount require adjustment, if any. The Expert shall be instructed to make its best efforts to deliver its written determination to Schering-Plough and Sanofi-Aventis no later than 20 days after the remaining differences underlying the SP Objection and/or SA Objection were referred to it. The Expert shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator. The determination of the Expert shall be final and binding on the Parties (in the absence of manifest error in which case the determination shall be void and shall be remitted to the Expert for correction). The Expert shall base its decision exclusively on the materials and arguments presented by the Parties and their respective auditors. The Parties shall ensure that the Expert has such access to the accounting records and other relevant documents of the Parties, Merial and its Subsidiaries and the I/SP Entities (and their respective independent accountants) as it may reasonably require, subject to such confidentiality obligations, as the Expert may consider appropriate. The fees and disbursements of the Expert shall be shared equally by Schering-Plough and Sanofi-Aventis.
Sample 1
Expert Review. Formatted: Font: Bold
Sample 1
Expert Review. If sanofi pasteur is unable to demonstrate to Emergent’s reasonable satisfaction that any proposed Additional Antigen satisfies the Inclusion Criteria, the Parties shall appoint an independent expert with expertise in the field of vaccine development and licensing reasonably acceptable to both Parties to determine whether the Antigen satisfies the Inclusion Criteria. If the Parties are unable to agree on the identity of the independent expert within ten (10) days of Emergent’s notifying sanofi pasteur that it desires the appointment of such expert, the independent expert shall be appointed by Emergent, and approved by sanofi pasteur, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Within twenty (20) days of such appointment, sanofi pasteur shall furnish to the expert (subject to such obligations of confidentiality and non-use as may be reasonably required by sanofi pasteur) all information necessary for the expert to make such determination with a copy to Emergent, provided that sanofi pasteur shall be entitled to redact sanofi pasteur Confidential Information from such copy. Emergent may also make submissions to the expert, with a copy to sanofi pasteur, within such period. Any such submission shall not, unless the Parties otherwise agree, exceed 15,000 words. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the other Party’s summary (or such longer period as may be required to ensure the presence of the expert), there shall be a one-day oral hearing before the expert at which each Party shall be given an equal opportunity to present its own position and hear and respond to the oral presentation given by the other Party. Within fifteen (15) days of such oral hearing each Party may submit a written rebuttal of the other Party’s summary providing that any rebuttal shall not exceed 5,000 words. The expert shall be required by the Parties to use all reasonable efforts to render his decision within sixty (60) days of his appointment or if earlier within thirty days following his receipt of all such information and such decision shall be final and binding upon each of the Parties. Should the expert determine that the proposed Additional Antigen satisfies the Inclusion Criteria, then Emergent shall pay the fees and expenses of the expert. Should the expert determine that the proposed Additional Antigen does not satisfy the Inclusion Criteria, then sanofi pasteur shall pay the fees and expenses of the expert.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Expert Review

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Expert Reports Without prejudice to the appointment of other kinds of experts where authorised by the applicable arbitration rules, the tribunal, at the request of the disputing parties, may appoint one or more experts to report to it in writing on any factual issue concerning environmental, public health, safety or other scientific matters raised by a disputing party in a proceeding, subject to such terms and conditions as the disputing parties may agree.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Expert Determination If a Dispute relates to any aspect of the technology underlying the provision of the Goods and/or Services or otherwise relates to an ICT technical, financial technical or other aspect of a technical nature (as the Parties may agree) and the Dispute has not been resolved by discussion or mediation, then either Party may request (which request will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) by written notice to the other that the Dispute is referred to an Expert for determination. The Expert shall be appointed by agreement in writing between the Parties, but in the event of a failure to agree within ten (10) Working Days, or if the person appointed is unable or unwilling to act, the Expert shall be appointed on the instructions of the President of the British Computer Society (or any other association that has replaced the British Computer Society). The Expert shall act on the following basis: he/she shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator and shall act fairly and impartially; the Expert's determination shall (in the absence of a material failure by either Party to follow the agreed procedures) be final and binding on the Parties; the Expert shall decide the procedure to be followed in the determination and shall be requested to make his/her determination within thirty (30) Working Days of his/her appointment or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter and the Parties shall assist and provide the documentation that the Expert requires for the purpose of the determination; any amount payable by one Party to another as a result of the Expert's determination shall be due and payable within twenty (20) Working Days of the Expert's determination being notified to the Parties; the process shall be conducted in private and shall be confidential; and the Expert shall determine how and by whom the costs of the determination, including his/her fees and expenses, are to be paid.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Attorney Review The Purchaser acknowledges that Purchaser has had the opportunity to consult with its legal counsel regarding the Agreement and that accordingly the terms of the Agreement are not to be construed against any party because that party drafted the Agreement or construed in favor of any Party because that Party failed to understand the legal effect of the provisions of the Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.