Process for Review Clause Samples
Process for Review. (a) The Manager and/or the Employee recognize that a position needs to be reviewed:
(i) The Manager notifies the Employee in writing, or
(ii) An Employee makes a request in writing to the Manager that the allocation of their position be reviewed.
(b) Within four (4) weeks, the Manager and the Employee
(i) reach agreement on the PCQ and it is posted on the system to be approved by the Manager and submitted for review by the Senior Administrator, or
(ii) If there is a failure to reach agreement, the Manager or the Employee may approach Human Resources and the Union for assistance. If consensus cannot be reached during this process, the PCQ as prepared by the Employee will be posted to the system for review by the Senior Administrator.
(c) Within two (2) weeks of receipt, the Senior Administrator approves the PCQ or notifies the Employee and Manager in writing that it is not approved, and the reasons why. The PCQ can then be resubmitted by the Employee with agreed-changes, it can be abandoned, or the Senior Administrator or Employee can approach Human Resources and the Union for assistance.
(d) If the Senior Administrator, Manager, and Employee cannot reach consensus, or in any event within two (2) weeks of the date the Employee receives notification that the completed PCQ referred to in 15.05 (b) is not approved by the Senior Administrator the Employee may refer the request and the completed PCQ to Human Resources for evaluation in consultation with the Senior Administrator.
(e) Within twelve (12) weeks of receipt of the PCQ, Human Resources
(i) Notifies the Employee (if applicable) and the Manager if changes are required in order for the PCQ to be scored. At this point, timelines are suspended until a revised PCQ is received, and
(ii) Determines the scoring of the position, and
(iii) Consults with the Union on the scoring of the position, and
(iv) Notifies the Manager, Union, and Employee of the decision in writing.
Process for Review. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will work with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (the “Experts”) to perform a review of the above topics. Following such review, their joint recommendations will be submitted to the County and the County will implement those joint recommendations. A copy of the joint recommendations will also be provided to Disability Rights Advocates and Public Counsel (collectively “Plaintiffs’ Counsel”). To the extent Professors ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ disagree, the following dispute resolution process shall apply and be final:
a. Upon notification of a dispute between the Experts, see Section IV.E infra, the Parties shall meet and confer within 30 days and attempt in good faith to resolve the dispute.
b. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute through the meet and confer process, either Party may submit the matter to Magistrate Judge ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ for purposes of mediation.
c. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute through mediation, they shall submit the matter to Magistrate Judge ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (Judge ▇▇▇▇▇) in the form of letter briefs for decision. The Parties agree that in resolving any dispute, Judge ▇▇▇▇▇ will rely solely on applicable federal and state law and not the terms of this Agreement. This includes, but is not limited to, the ADA, Section 504, California Government Code § 11135, and the IDEA, as applicable.
d. Either party may appeal Judge ▇▇▇▇▇’ decision to the Ninth Circuit.
e. The District Court, in its discretion, may award fees to the prevailing party in accordance with the standard set forth in Christianberg Garment Co. v. E.E.O.C., 434 U.S. 412 (1978). If Plaintiffs are the prevailing party, the Court may, in its discretion, reduce the amount of attorneys' fees and costs awarded if it determines that the County’s position(s) were reasonable, in whole or in part.
Process for Review. If requested, the classifier will inform the Union of the standards and/or other materials used to classify the position. Materials/ standards used by the classifier but not available on the Internet or from the employee will be provided to the Union. The final signed classification/ position evaluation statement, if prepared, will be provided by the classifier to the Union, if requested.
Process for Review. A process for review of proposed procurements is used to avoid purchase of unnecessary or duplicative items.
Process for Review. (1) Department personnel will review all applications for completeness and timeliness.
(2) All applications determined to be complete and postmarked on or before May 15 will be presented to the Fish and Wildlife Commission for approval.
(3) Any application determined to be incomplete or not postmarked on or before May 15 will automatically be rejected and will not be considered by the Fish and Wildlife Commission.
Process for Review