District of Columbia Clause Samples

The "District of Columbia" clause specifies that the laws and jurisdiction of the District of Columbia will govern the interpretation and enforcement of the contract. In practice, this means that any legal disputes arising from the agreement must be resolved according to D.C. law, and any litigation or arbitration will typically take place within its courts. This clause provides clarity and predictability for both parties by establishing a single, agreed-upon legal framework, thereby reducing uncertainty about which laws apply and where disputes will be handled.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
District of Columbia. If Employee’s primary place of employment with the Company is located in the District of Columbia, the following terms shall apply to the interpretation of this Agreement and supersede any conflicting terms:
District of Columbia. Paragraph 2(g)(v) does not apply to employees earning less than $154,200 in 2024. This amount may increase each calendar year according to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area.
District of Columbia. It is a crime to provide false or misleading information to an insurer for the purpose of defrauding the insurer or any other person. Penalties include imprisonment and/or fines. In addition, an insurer may deny insurance benefits if false information materially related to a claim was provided by the applicant. Florida: Any person who knowingly and with intent to injure, defraud, or deceive any insurer files a statement of claim or an application containing any false, incomplete, or misleading information is guilty of a felony of the third degree.
District of Columbia. The policy is hereby amended for the District of Columbia as follows:
District of Columbia. If the Participant is a “covered employee,” as defined by the District of Columbia’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 (as amended): (a) Section 1(a)(ii) of Appendix A shall not apply after the Termination Date; and (b) During the Employment Term, Section 1(a)(ii) of Appendix A shall apply only to the extent permitted by District of Columbia law. A “covered employee” is an individual who performs work for pay in the District of Columbia for an employer and who is not a “highly compensated employee,” and (i) spends (or, for new hires, is reasonably anticipated to spend) more than 50% of his or her work time for the employer working in the District of Columbia, or (ii) whose employment for the employer is or will be based in the District of Columbia and the employee regularly spends (or, for new hires, is reasonably anticipated to spend) a substantial amount of his or her work time for the employer in the District of Columbia and no more than 50% of his or her work time for such employer in another jurisdiction. The term “covered employee” does not include partners in a partnership. A “highly compensated employee” is an employee who earns or is reasonably expected to earn from his or her employer compensation greater than or equal to $162,164 in a consecutive 12-month period (which is the threshold amount for 2026 and subject to annual adjustment for inflation based on adjustments to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Urban Consumers, in the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the US Department of Labor). If the Participant is a “highly compensated employee”: (a) As applied to Section 1(a)(ii) of Appendix A, the Restricted Period shall not exceed 365 days from the Termination Date; and (b) The Participant is provided with the following notice, at least 14 days prior to the execution of the Agreement: The District of Columbia’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020 limits the use of non-compete agreements. It allows employers to request non-compete agreements from highly compensated employees, as that term is defined in the Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020, under certain conditions. The Company has determined that you are a highly compensated employee. For more information about the Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020, contact th...
District of Columbia. SS. BE IT REMEMBERED that on this 17th day of September, 2009, personally came before me, a notary public for the District of Columbia, Ke▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Vice President and Treasurer of DELMARVA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Delaware and the Commonwealth of Virginia (the “Company”), party to the foregoing instrument, known to me personally to be such, and acknowledged the instrument to be his own act and deed and the act and deed of the Company; that his signature is in his own proper handwriting; that the seal affixed is the common or corporate seal of the Company; and that his act of signing, sealing, executing and delivering such instrument was duly authorized by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year aforesaid. /s/ LI▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Notary Public, District of Columbia My commission expires 1-1-2010 Li▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇otary Public, District of Columbia My Commission expires January 1, 2010
District of Columbia. If Employee is an employee in the District of Columbia, as long as Employee perform works in the District of Columbia within the meaning of the “Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020,” then no restriction in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, the noncompetition, client nonsolicitation, business vendor nonsolicitation, and employee nonsolicitation restrictions) will be applied to Employee in a way that would prohibit Employee from being simultaneously or subsequently employed by another person, performing work or providing services for pay for another person, or operating Employee’s own business. However, Employee understands that nothing in this exception to this Agreement’s restrictions shall be construed to permit Employee to take any action that involves or may result in the use or disclosure of Confidential Information, proprietary, or sensitive information, client lists, or a trade secret, as that term is defined in section 2(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988 (D.C. Law 7-216; D.C. Official Code §36-401(4)). Such actions shall remain prohibited and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or eliminate any rights or remedies Employer would have against Employee under trade secret law, unfair competition law, agency law or other laws applicable in the District of Columbia absent this Agreement.
District of Columbia. The Government of the District of Columbia is eligible to use GSA sources of supply and services. The Government of the District of Columbia and those parts thereof that have been determined eligible to use GSA sources of supply and services are listed in App. B.
District of Columbia. If Employee is an employee in the District of Columbia, as long as Employee perform works in the District of Columbia within the meaning of the “Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Amendment Act of 2020,” then no obligation in this Agreement (including, but not limited to, the noncompetition and non-solicitation obligations) will be applied to Employee in a way that would prohibit Employee from being simultaneously or subsequently employed by another person, performing work or providing services for pay for another person, or operating Employee’s own business. However, Employee understands that nothing in this exception to this Agreement’s obligations shall be construed to permit Employee to take any action that involves or may result in the use or disclosure of Confidential Information, proprietary, or sensitive information, client lists, or a trade secret, as that term is defined in section 2(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act of 1988 (D.C. Law 7-216; D.C. Official Code §36-401(4)). Such actions shall remain prohibited and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit or eliminate any rights or remedies the Company would have against Employee under trade secret law, unfair competition law, agency law or other laws applicable in the District of Columbia absent this Agreement.
District of Columbia. 10 REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of September 27, 2000 by and among First Washington Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("First Washington"), First Washington Realty Limited Partnership, a Maryland limited partnership ("FWOP"), and each of the directly or indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries of First Washington and/or FWOP listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement (collectively and jointly and severally with First Washington and FWOP, "Seller"), with an address of 4350 ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ USRP I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Purchaser"), with an address at 1013▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇multaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, (a) Seller has entered into a certain Master Agreement dated as of the date hereof (the "Master Agreement") with Purchaser and certain affiliates of Purchaser, (b) First Washington and FWOP have entered into a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of the date hereof (the "Merger Agreement") with Purchaser and certain affiliates of Purchaser and (c) FWOP and USRP LP, LLC, an affiliate of Purchaser, have entered into a certain Limited Partnership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of the date hereof (the "Partnership Interest Agreement"). This Agreement, the Master Agreement, the Merger Agreement and the Partnership Interest Agreement are collectively referred to as the "Transaction Documents".