Development Density. The maximum density for the Property shall be as set forth in the Amended GDP. It is acknowledged that application of City development standards and criteria may serve to limit or prevent development of density upon the Property.
Development Density. The first full paragraph of Section 6.1A of the Development Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor:
Development Density. The maximum aggregate amount of development density permitted on the Land with respect to certain project types is as follows (“Total Permitted Density”): Office 750,000 square feet of Net Floor Area Retail 410,000 square feet of Net Floor Area Residential 1,334 living units Multi-Family Residential 504 living units”
Development Density. The maximum aggregate amount of development density permitted on the Land with respect to certain project types is as follows ("Total Permitted Density"): Office 750,000 square feet of Net Floor Area Retail 250,000 square feet of Net Floor Area Residential 1,730 living units Multi-Family Residential 900 living units The development of Multi-Family Residential units consumes Development Allocations in both the Residential and the Multi- Family Residential Use Categories, i.e., for each Multi-Family Residential unit developed on the Land, there must be a Development Allocation of one Residential unit and one Multi- Family Residential unit for the Multi-Family Residential unit being developed. For the purpose of Development Allocations, each residential duplex structure shall be treated as two single- family residential living units.
Development Density. Minimum setbacks for buildings shall be fifty (50) feet from all street lines, thirty (30) feet from side property lines and thirty (30) feet from rear property lines. The front yard (50 foot setback) shall be maintained as a 75% landscaped area with only paved driveways and sidewalks allowed. Where possible, a minimum fifty (50) foot setback area with existing landscaping shall be maintained along Forge Parkway. For side and rear yards, fifteen (15) foot setback lines shall be maintained as landscaped areas with the exception of 25% of such area allowed for paved driveways and sidewalks. Minimum fifty (50) foot setback and landscaped areas (with existing vegetation to remain) shall be maintained for land abutting residentially zoned property.
Development Density. It was general public consensus that the development density of the PDS sites should be as low as possible. - Over 1,500 standard letters were included in one submission from an owners representatives committee of a residential estate adjacent to the PDS2 against any form of development on PDS2 & 3, apart from urban park. Another subsequent submission from the Chairman of the same owners representatives committee indicated that from a previous questionnaire survey carried out by the committee, 990 units (about 4000 residents) had expressed the same view. A similar request was reflected from a survey conducted by the Office of Kowloon City District Councillor. - Amongst the submissions requesting a lower development density and building height for PDS2 and PDS3, there were suggestions that the building height should be compatible or lower than that of Whampoa Garden. - Some expressed that if there is development, the number of proposed hotel and residential building should be reduced. The buildings in PDS2 and PDS3 should not result in / cause / have such effect as a “wind-shield”. - There was a submission suggesting to impose a stepping down profile of both height and plot ratio to ensure a good urban form and to minimize the impacts of the future Xxxx Xxx bay reclamation developments on existing residents and the harbourfront; whilst another submission suggests that the building at PDS 1 could be the tallest, then PDS 3 and PDS2, given their relative impact on the ventilation and in respect of current design, and the width of the CDA should be reduced to align with the eastern boundary of PDS3, leaving the remaining area for public open space. - One submission suggested incorporating the PDS3 into PDS2 so that the built facilities including bus terminus and community facilities could be provided with better flexibility. A taller height could be considered for the buildings in PDS3. The 2 sites could be linked by an elevated walkway, and it should be designed and operated comprehensively.
