Judiciary the judicial power of the Judiciary will be vested in a unified judicial system which shall be composed of a Supreme Court, a Superior Court, and such other subordinate courts as the General Assembly may from time to time ordain and establish.
Judiciary. 31. The Bougainville Constitution may provide for an impartial judiciary for Bougainville, or may provide for Bougainville to operate either in full or in part under courts established under the national Constitution.
Judiciary. 8. Federal Rail Ways and Inter-State Highways.
Judiciary. Contractor Relationships (JAN 2003)
Judiciary. Using resources from the European funds, we will continue the computerization of the judiciary, especially in the use of data boxes and their related applications and systems. We will propose an increase in the remuneration of administrative staff as far as the budget allows and based on savings from suspending further judicial appointments. We will reinforce the training of judges, senior court officials, assistants and administrative staff, with a focus on the use of information and communication technologies. We will conduct a detailed analysis of court agendas in order to strengthen the principle of mediation in the resolving of legal disputes, reduce unnecessary court administration and, in certain cases, remove the decision-making powers of the courts, e.g. by transferring such powers to another state or non-state body or entity. We will also propose an amendment to the rules on the use of arbitration clauses. We will increase the supervision of the Ministry of Justice in relation to the disciplinary culpability of judges and will propose measures to enable the faster and more thorough hearing of the disciplinary culpability of judges. For future judges, we will make the judicial examinations more stringent and introduce a mandatory three years’ experience in other fields of law, plus a two-year training period, prior to their appointment. We will reinforce the principle of the lifelong education of judges. We will propose amendments to legislation paving the way for the creation of material and technical conditions for the further employment of inmates serving time. We will submit amendments to legislation facilitating the establishment of specialized tribunals and specialized prosecution services, especially in the fight against corruption and serious financial crime, so that these cases are placed in the hands of experienced and specially trained judges and prosecutors. We will submit an amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure introducing time limits for certain types of proceedings so as to avoid unnecessary delays in such proceedings while maintaining the equality of the parties to legal disputes. We will analyse court fees and, on the basis of the results, will present a modification to court fees reflecting the type of case being heard, while respecting the need to ensure non- discriminatory access to court services by citizens and companies. We will submit a draft amendment to the Act on the Public Prosecutor’s Office and other appropriate ...
Judiciary. As mentioned above, concession agreements are admin- istrative contracts. Therefore disputes arising from con- cession agreements are subject to the Article 2/1-c in the Code of Administrative Procedure (“CAP”) numbered 2577. As a matter of fact, the Article stipulates that all dis- putes originating from administrative contracts signed for carrying the public services out, are administrative proceedings within the scope of the administrative courts’ duty, unless arbitration is stipulated in the contract.46 It is worth mentioning that the lawsuits involving the concession owner’s own personnel, industrial and com- kendi personeli ile ilgili davalar, sınaî ve ticari kamu hiz- metleri ile ilgili davalar, kullanıcı ile aralarındaki xxxx- lar, arada bir özel hukuk ilişkisi bulunduğundan dolayı, adli yargıda görülür. Ancak, kullanıcıların xxxxxxx söz- leşmesinin düzenleyici hükümlerine karşı açtığı davalar yine idari yargıda görülmektedir.47
Judiciary. 27.1.The Parties agree to undertake institutional reforms in the judiciary to appoint/accommodate men and women from Darfur at a rate of 20% within no more than 6 (six months) of the date of signing the Peace Agreement while taking into consideration standards of competence, qualification, and positive discrimination for the men and women of Darfur.
Judiciary. The Court of First Instance was with the Treaty of Lisbon renamed the General Court. The Civil Service Tribunal and the European Court of Justice (formerly named the Court of Justice of the European Communities, and formally called only Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon), along with the General Court, were established as sub-courts of a new EU institution named the Court of Justice of the European Union. The jurisdiction of the courts continued to be excluded from matters of foreign policy, though new jurisdiction to review foreign policy sanction measures, as well as certain 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice' (AFSJ) matters not concerning policing and criminal cooperation, were added.[27] [28] Council of Ministers Voting weights in both the Council of Ministers and the European Council member state Nice Lisbon votes % pop. in millions % Germany 29 8.4% 82 16.5% France 29 8.4% 64 12.9% United Kingdom 29 8.4% 62 12.4% Italy 29 8.4% 60 12.0% Spain 27 7.8% 46 9.0% Poland 27 7.8% 38 7.6% Romania 14 4.1% 21 4.3% Netherlands 13 3.8% 17 3.3% Greece 12 3.5% 11 2.2% Portugal 12 3.5% 11 2.1% Belgium 12 3.5% 11 2.1% Czech Republic 12 3.5% 10 2.1% Hungary 12 3.5% 10 2.0% Sweden 10 2.9% 9.2 1.9% Austria 10 2.9% 8.3 1.7% Bulgaria 10 2.9% 7.6 1.5% Denmark 7 2.0% 5.5 1.1% Slovakia 7 2.0% 5.4 1.1% Finland 7 2.0% 5.3 1.1% Ireland 7 2.0% 4.5 0.9% Lithuania 7 2.0% 3.3 0.7% Latvia 4 1.2% 2.2 0.5% Slovenia 4 1.2% 2.0 0.4% Estonia 4 1.2% 1.3 0.3% Cyprus 4 1.2% 0.87 0.2% Luxembourg 4 1.2% 0.49 0.1% Malta 3 0.9% 0.41 0.1% total 345 100% 498 100% required majority 255 74% 324 65% The treaty has expanded the use of qualified majority voting (QMV) in the Council of Ministers by having it replace unanimity as the standard voting procedure in almost every policy area. Moreover, taking effect in 2014, the definition of a qualified majority will change: A qualified majority is reached when at least 55% of all member states, who comprise at least 65% of EU citizens, vote in favour of a proposal. When the Council of Ministers is acting neither on a proposal of the Commission nor on one of the High Representative, QMV requires 72% of the member states while the population requirement remains the same. To block legislation, at least 4 countries (representing at least 35% of the EU population) have to vote against the proposal. Hence, the voting powers of the member states are based on their population, and are no more dependent on a negotiable system of voting points. The curr...
Judiciary. Improved standard of prison buildings and training of personnel - Educational programmes in prisons - Improved health care and health information for prison inmates - Preventive action to reduce youth criminality - Competence building in the courts to enhance EU regulations - Combating and preventing organized crime - Improved competence programmes and physical conditions for asylum seekers and illegal immigrants - Strengthening of the probation system
Judiciary. (a) Design and implementation of an information strategy for the Judiciary and a Court Case Administration System in the High Court, through the provision of advisory services and training, and the acquisition of equipment.
