Audit Settlement Sample Clauses

Audit Settlement. If an error is discovered as a result of an audit performed by Manager or LACERA, or if Manager becomes aware of any error affecting the Account or Managed Assets through any other means, Manager shall use its best efforts to promptly correct such error or to cause the appropriate party to correct such error. Manager shall pay any Claims resulting from such error to LACERA, pursuant to Section 24 above.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Audit Settlement. If an error is discovered as a result of an audit performed by LACERA, or if Consultant becomes aware of any error affecting LACERA through any other means, Consultant shall promptly correct such error by crediting or debiting LACERA in the appropriate amount and shall pay damages to LACERA pursuant to Section 17 above.
Audit Settlement. If, at any time during the term of the Agreement or within five (5) years after the expiration or termination of the Agreement, authorized representatives of the COUNTY conduct an audit of the CONTRACTOR regarding the services provided to the COUNTY hereunder, and if such audit finds that the COUNTY's dollar liability for such services is less than payments made by the COUNTY to the CONTRACTOR, then the CONTRACTOR agrees that the difference, at the Director's discretion, shall be either: 1) repaid forthwith by the CONTRACTOR to the COUNTY by cash payment, or 2) at the COUNTY's option, credited against any future payments due by the COUNTY, to the CONTRACTOR, whether under this Agreement or otherwise. If such audit finds that the COUNTY's dollar liability for services provided hereunder is more than payments made by the COUNTY to the CONTRACTOR, then the difference shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR by the COUNTY provided that in no event shall the COUNTY's maximum obligation for this Agreement exceed the funds appropriated by the COUNTY for the purpose of this Agreement.
Audit Settlement. If, at any time during the term of this Contract or within five (5) years after the expiration or termination of this Contract, authorized representatives of COUNTY conduct an audit of CONTRACTOR regarding the services provided to COUNTY hereunder and if such audit finds that COUNTY'S dollar liability for such services is less than payments made by COUNTY to CONTRACTOR then CONTRACTOR shall repay the difference to COUNTY by cash payment within thirty (30) days of the final audit report to the Board of Supervisors. If such audit finds that COUNTY'S dollar liability for services provided hereunder is more than payments made by COUNTY to CONTRACTOR, then the difference shall be paid to CONTRACTOR by COUNTY provided that in no event shall COUNTY'S maximum obligation under this Contract exceed the funds appropriated by COUNTY for the purpose of this Contract. COUNTY will notify CONTRACTOR of any audit dispute and permit CONTRACTOR to participate in any response. Nothing in this section constitutes a waiver of CONTRACTOR'S rights and remedies.
Audit Settlement. If such audit finds that FCERA’s dollar liability for such work is less than payment made by FCERA, then the difference will be either repaid by AUDITOR to FCERA by cash payment upon demand or, at the option of FCERA, deducted from any amounts otherwise due to AUDITOR from FCERA. If such audit finds that FCERA’s dollar liability for such work is more than the payments made by FCERA, then the difference will be paid to AUDITOR by FCERA.
Audit Settlement. If, at any time during the term of the Contract or within five (5) years after the expiration or termination of the Contract, authorized representatives of County conduct an audit of Contractor regarding the services provided to the County hereunder, and if such audit finds that the County's dollar liability for such services is less than payments made by the County to the Contractor, then Contractor agrees that the difference, at the DPSS Director's discretion, shall be either: 1) repaid forthwith by the Contractor to the County by cash payment, or 2) at the County’s option, credited against any future payments due by the County, to the Contractor, whether under this Contract or otherwise. If such audit finds that the County’s dollar liability for services provided hereunder is more than payments made by the County to the Contractor, then the difference shall be paid to Contractor by the County provided that in no event shall the County’s maximum obligation for this Contract exceed the funds appropriated by the County for the purpose of this Contract.
Audit Settlement. If an error that is directly or indirectly related to the Consulting Services is discovered as a result of an audit performed by ACERA, or if Consultant becomes aware of any error affecting ACERA through any other means, Consultant shall promptly correct such error by crediting or debiting ACERA in the appropriate amount. If any such error is greater than five percent (5%), regardless of whether it was discovered by ACERA or Consultant, Consultant shall pay any and all fees incurred by ACERA in conducting such audit and damages pursuant to Section 16 above.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Audit Settlement. If, at any time during the term of this Agreement or within five (5) years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, authorized representatives of COUNTY conduct an audit of CONTRACTOR regarding the services provided to COUNTY hereunder and if such audit finds that COUNTY’s dollar liability for such services is less than payments made by COUNTY to CONTRACTOR, then CONTRACTOR agrees that the difference, at the COUNTY’s discretion, shall be either: (1) repaid forthwith by CONTRACTOR to COUNTY by cash payment; or (2) at COUNTY’s option, credited against future payments hereunder to CONTRACTOR. If such audit finds that COUNTY’s dollar liability for services provided hereunder is more than payments made by COUNTY to CONTRACTOR, then the difference shall be paid to CONTRACTOR by COUNTY provided that in no event shall COUNTY’s maximum obligation for this Agreement exceed the Maximum Contract Sum.
Audit Settlement. (a) Tenant has exercised its right to audit Direct Expenses for the Base Year of 2002 and the calendar year 2003.

Related to Audit Settlement

  • Agreement Settlement Agreement Settlement will reconcile any discrepancies that may have occurred during the term of this Agreement between actual OHA disbursements of funds awarded for MHS 27 Services under a particular line of Exhibit D-1, “Financial Assistance Award”, containing an “A” in column one and amounts due for such services provided by County based on the rate set forth in the special condition identified in that line of the Financial Assistance Award. For purposes of this section, amounts due to County is determined by actual amount of services delivered under that line of the Financial Assistance Award during the period specified in that line of the Financial Assistance Award, as properly reported in accordance with section 3., “Special Reporting Requirements” above or as required in an applicable Specialized Service Requirement. The settlement process will not apply to funds awarded for an approved Reserved Service Capacity Payment.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • The Settlement The Settlement was reached on May 11, 2018. Class Counsel filed this action on May 10, 2018. Over two years prior to the filing of this action, Class Counsel and Defendant’s Counsel conducted an adversarial informal discovery process. Class Counsel reviewed and analyzed thousands of pages of documents provided by Defendant and also reviewed many other documents, including U.S. Department of Labor Forms 5500 and other publicly available documents. The Parties participated in mediation before a nationally recognized mediator who has extensive experience in resolving similar claims involving other 401(k) plans. Only after six months of extensive arm’s length negotiation following the mediation were the parties able to agree to the terms of the Settlement. As part of the Settlement, a Qualified Settlement Fund of $17,000,000 will be established to resolve the Class Action. The Net Settlement Amount is $17,000,000 minus any Administrative Expenses, taxes, tax expenses, Court-approved Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Class Representatives’ Compensation, and other approved expenses of the litigation. The Net Settlement Amount will be allocated to Class Members according to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court. In addition to the monetary component of the Settlement, the Parties to the Settlement have agreed to certain additional terms: (1) During the first eighteen months (18) following the final approval of the Settlement, Defendant has agreed that the Plan’s fiduciaries will conduct a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) process for recordkeeping services to the Plan; (2) Within the first year following final approval of the Settlement, Defendant has agreed to publish a communication to then current Plan participants explaining the risks and benefits of the Plan’s money market fund investment option; (3) Defendant also will use an independent consultant familiar with fixed income investment options in defined contribution plans who will review the investment lineup and make recommendations to the Plan’s fiduciaries regarding whether to retain the money market fund and whether to add a stable value or comparable fund; (4) In addition, during the three- year Settlement period, Defendant has agreed to provide Class Counsel a list of the Plan’s investment options and fees; and (5) In considering investment options for the Plan, Defendant has agreed that the Plan’s fiduciaries will consider: (a) the lowest-cost share class available for any particular mutual fund considered for inclusion in the Plan as well as other criteria applicable to different share classes; (b) the availability of revenue sharing rebates on any share class available for any particular mutual fund considered for inclusion in the Plan; and (c) the availability of collective trusts, to the extent such investments are permissible and are otherwise identical to a particular mutual fund considered for inclusion in the Plan.

  • Loss Settlement Covered property losses are settled as follows:

  • Pro rata interest settlement If the Agent has notified the Lenders that it is able to distribute interest payments on a “pro rata basis” to Existing Lenders and New Lenders then (in respect of any transfer pursuant to Clause 25.5 (Procedure for transfer) or any assignment pursuant to Clause 25.6 (Procedure for assignment) the Transfer Date of which, in each case, is after the date of such notification and is not on the last day of an Interest Period):

  • Assignment Settlement Option ☐ The undersigned Lender hereby agrees to have an amount equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Existing Term Loans held by such Lender prepaid on the Third Amendment Effective Date and to purchase by assignment 2020 Refinancing Term Loans in an equal principal amount (or such lesser amount allocated to such Lender by the Administrative Agent). ​ CARVAL CLO III, LTD., as a 2020Refinancing Term Lender by CarVal Investors, LPits attorney-in-fact By: /s/ Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx ​ Name:Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx ​ Title:Authorized Signatory ​ ​ ​ Cashless Settlement Option ☒ The undersigned Lender hereby commits an amount equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Existing Term Loans held by such Lender to be 2020 Refinancing Term Loans and agrees to exchange (on a cashless basis) 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Existing Term Loans (or such lesser amount allocated to such Lender by the Administrative Agent) held by such Lender for 2020 Refinancing Term Loans in an equal principal amount.

  • The Settlement Fund 37. Releasors shall look solely to the Settlement Fund for settlement and satisfaction of all Released Claims against the DENSO Defendants and the Releasees, and shall have no other recovery against the DENSO Defendants or any other Releasee for any Released Claims.

  • Gross Settlement Amount Except as otherwise provided by Section 9 below, Defendant promises to pay $450,000.00 and no more as the Gross Settlement Amount, and to separately pay any and all employer payroll taxes owed on the Wage Portions of the Individual Class Payments. Defendant has no obligation to pay the Gross Settlement Amount (or any payroll taxes) prior to the deadline stated in Section 4.3 of this Agreement. The Administrator will disburse the entire Gross Settlement Amount without asking or requiring Participating Class Members or PAGA Group Members to submit any claim as a condition of payment. None of the Gross Settlement Amount will revert to Defendant.

  • Cashless Settlement Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, any Lender may exchange, continue or rollover all or a portion of its Loans in connection with any refinancing, extension, loan modification or similar transaction permitted by the terms of this Agreement, pursuant to a cashless settlement mechanism approved by the Borrower, the Administrative Agent and such Lender.

  • Dispute Settlement 1. A Party may not initiate proceedings under the general dispute settlement provisions of this Agreement regarding a refusal to grant temporary entry under this Chapter unless: (a) the matter involves a pattern of practice; and (b) the business person has exhausted the available administrative remedies regarding the particular matter. 2. The remedies referred to in subparagraph 1(b) shall be deemed to be exhausted if a final determination in the matter has not been issued by the competent authority within one year of the institution of an administrative proceeding, and the failure to issue a determination is not attributable to delay caused by the business person.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.