Meaningful means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
Meaningful refers to variants where scribal error is reasoned as opposed to intentional scribal decisions. Texts identified as scribal error are not included among the list of witnesses. Gen 13:8b shows ms. 61 as Smr. Kennicott, 1:21. Lev 10:10 is cited by ms. 129 (an undated Targumic text), which < the third and final ןי . Kennicott, 1:221. Lev 11:47 shows ms. 18 (approx. circa. 1376.), which < the ו prefix in the second occurrence of ןי . Kennicott, 1:226. 1 Sam 20:42e shows a variant in ms. 150 (Targum circa 1455), which is likely the result of scribal error. One expects the absence of the ן more than the absence of the ו in the second ן . Other compound formulas are attested with this pattern in the MT: כו + כו + כ + כ (Ezek 45:25); בו + בו + ב + ב (Exod 35:31); and ל + ל +ול+ול(Deut 29:7). As a result, ms. 150 is another possible variant for inclusion even though this is likely a scribal error due to parablepsis. Kennicott, 1:547. Ezek 47:18a contains a variant in ms. 145, which < the מ in the same ןיבומ. It is not clear if this is the first, second, or third occurrence in the ןיבומ. Kennicott, 2:244. 112 Ginsb; 𝔖; Abraham Tal, Genesis: Critical Apparatus and Notes, BHQ 1 (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2015); Barnes, 41. 113 Bernhard Stade and Friedrich Schwally, The Book of Kings: Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text, SBOT 9 (Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1904), 142. SamP, 20. Vulg, Lev 11:47. Sperber notes one variant for Gen 13:8. BiA, 1:18. 114 In Lev 10:10 Elliger and Rudolph cite one reference for the omission of the final ןי and adjective, as found in the Cairo Geniza fragment “fragmentum codicis Hebraici in geniza Cairensi repertum.” BHS, 173. For Ezek 47:18a, see: BHS, 987. For 1 Kings 15:19a, see: BHS, 598.
Examples of Meaningful in a sentence
Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects.
Some classes participated in a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience.
Please describe (i.e., grade, description of unit, partnerships, etc.):Some classes participated in a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience.
A system wide Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience is in place.
No evidence that students in this grade participated in a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience.
More Definitions of Meaningful
Meaningful means to have a significant or definitive impact.
Meaningful. Durango support may include [***].
Meaningful means significant, consequential, essential, important, purposeful, relevant, substantial, or useful, and appears to have been employed to distinguish from mere abstract, pro forma, courtesy, or trivial control. See, e.g., Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 78 T.C. 882 (1982); Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp., 513 U.S. 30, 55 (1994); N.L.R.B. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., 494 U.S. 775, 800 (1990); Saxbe v. Washington Post Co., 417 U.S. 843, 863 (1974); Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 772 F.3d 1225, 1239 (11th Cir. 2014); Raphan v. United States, 759 F.2d 879, 883 (Fed. Cir. 1985); Bartz v. United States, 633 F.2d 571, 576 (Ct. Cl. 1980); Vnuk v. C.I.R., 621 F.2d 1318, 1320-1321 (8th Cir. 1980). Review of these and numerous other decisions that have required “meaningful” control in various contexts did not reveal that particular legal contours have been elucidated to make “meaningful” mean anything more than the ordinary meaning of “control”.
Meaningful means as follows:
Meaningful means that your project should be useful to you. It should enable you to improve student learning in your department or program by specifying one or more areas where such learning is not currently occurring as desired.
Meaningful also means that the findings from your project should enable you to pinpoint whether to make curricular changes, pedagogical changes, both, or some other kind of changes to improve student learning, as well as what specific changes to make. While there are circumstances in which an assessment project leads to the conclusion that no changes need to be made, or that the assessment project itself needs to be retooled, a project driven by a strong sense that learning is weak in an area (often backed up by informal observations over time) will generally conclude with valuable ideas about how to modify teaching to improve learning.
Meaningful means that the encounter does more than meet a ‘tick-box’ requirement. The underlying test of meaningfulness is that the encounter has a personally valued impact on the learner. The guidelines for this benchmark refer to having “an opportunity to learn about what work is like or what it takes to be successful in the workplace”. As well as asking learners to reflect on these impacts in debriefing sessions, it is worth asking them what else the encounter has meant for them. This will help colleges to detect other potential gains such as raised aspirations, greater self-confidence and higher determination.