Team Leader Review Process Sample Clauses

Team Leader Review Process. A Joint (Union/Management) review of a Team Leader’s performance will be initiated by the Plant PJAC. A request for a performance review may come from either Union or Management. The review will be conducted by a combination of questionnaire and interviews with the Group leader, the Departmental Team Members and the Team Leader being reviewed. Evaluation will be based on the performance of the Team Leader responsibilities as outlined in the 2010 Local Agreement, Team Leader section, item “X. Xxxxx of Responsibility”. Specific areas of focus will include: ▪ Quality ▪ Communications, internal & external, daily huddles ▪ Schedule attainment ▪ Record keeping, team boards ▪ Interaction, internal & external ▪ Training Records – Team Leader The review will be conducted by two representatives from the Union and two representatives from Management. These people should not be parties of interest. Assigned Union and Management Quality Network Representatives are an example of possible reviewers. The confidential results of the review are to be reported out to the PJAC and should include a recommendation for improvement, additional training or removal. It is understood that the 2008 Local Agreement states; “Management reserves the right to remove coordinators from positions in which they are not performing their duties as described in the agreement.”
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Team Leader Review Process. A Joint (Union/Management) review of a Team Leader’s performance will be initiated by the Plant PJAC. A request for a performance review may come from either Union or Management. The review will be conducted by a combination of questionnaire and interviews with the Group leader, the Departmental Team Members and the Team Leader being reviewed. Evaluation will be based on the performance of the Team Leader responsibilities as outlined in the 2010 Local Agreement, Team Leader section, item “X. Xxxxx of Responsibility”. Specific areas of focus will include:  Quality  Communications, internal & external, daily huddles  Schedule attainment  Record keeping, team boards  Interaction, internal & external  Training Records – Team Leader The review will be conducted by two representatives from the Union and two representatives from Management. These people should not be parties of interest. Assigned Union and Management Quality Network Representatives are an example of possible reviewers. The confidential results of the review are to be reported out to the PJAC and should include a recommendation for improvement, additional training or removal. It is understood that the 2008 Local Agreement states; “Management reserves the right to remove coordinators from positions in which they are not performing their duties as described in the agreement.”
Sample 1

Related to Team Leader Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Interview Process Interviews will take place over a period of ninety (90) days. The interviews both of bargaining unit employees and of managers will be conducted jointly by Union/Industry members of the Technical Committee (or designates).

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Project Steering Committee (a) The Recipient shall establish and maintain at all times until the completion of the Project, the Project Steering Committee with a composition, mandate and resources satisfactory to the Association.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.