System Avoidance, Bare Life, and Statelessness Sample Clauses

System Avoidance, Bare Life, and Statelessness. Early research regarding the criminalization of immigration status posits that such legislation would work to create a vulnerable population of immigrants who would be easily victimized in the complete absence of state protection. More recent studies move past theory and into empirical reality, finding that new legislation and enforcement against undocumented immigrants increases their victimization (Zatz and Xxxxx 2012). Because they reasonably fear deportation – with the attendant family separation (Xxxxxx- Xxxxxx, et al. 2011), lengthy detention (Xxxxxx-Xxxx 2012a), subsequent unclear reintegration path in the home country (Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx 2008), and, at worst, political and criminal victimization upon repatriation (Xxxxxx 2004) – undocumented immigrants do not call the police when they are in danger (Zatz and Xxxxx 2012). Though the relationship in this literature is quite clear, the causal mechanism is implicit – because their bodies and place make them guilty of status offenses, undocumented immigrants avoid the institutions of the state and are thus rendered vulnerable (Xxxxx 2012). Evidence of system avoidance by Latinos – irrespective of their individual immigration status – is, at present, largely through qualitative studies with small or medium sample sizes and limited geographic coverage. When, for example, Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (2015) argue that “[t]he fear that rumors of raids produce is so real that parents to do not show up for work, children miss school, and the police become people to avoid,” they do so based on interviews with 27 undocumented immigrant youth. Dreby (2012) draws on interviews with 110 children and 91 parents – combined with home and school visits with 12 families – to illuminate the ways in which the threat of deportation, specifically, makes US-born children afraid of police and fearful of the state as a potential agent in family separation. She finds that the ubiquitous threat of family dissolution not only strains family relationships, especially between siblings of different immigration statuses and between children and fathers, but causes children to withdraw from visible parts of national life. These studies suggest that the ramifications of increased criminalization have widespread effects for youth in immigrant communities. Work done by Xxxxxxxx (2013) at the University of Illinois at Chicago may represent the best example of semi-quantitative large-n work on system avoidance in the immigrant community ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to System Avoidance, Bare Life, and Statelessness

  • Provisioning of High Frequency Spectrum and Splitter Space 3.2.1 BellSouth will provide <<customer_name>> with access to the High Frequency Spectrum as follows:

  • Non-Synchronous Generation The Interconnection Customer shall design its Small Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the high-side of the generator substation at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless the NYISO or the Transmission Owner in whose Transmission District the Small Generating Facility interconnects has established a different power factor range that applies to all similarly situated non-synchronous generators in the control area or Transmission District (as applicable) on a comparable basis, in accordance with Good Utility Practice. This power factor range standard shall be dynamic and can be met using, for example, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors, or a combination of the two. This requirement shall only apply to newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators that have not yet executed a Facilities Study Agreement as of September 21, 2016.

  • SS7 Network Interconnection 9.7.1 SS7 Network Interconnection is the interconnection of Global Connection local signaling transfer point switches or Global Connection local or tandem switching systems with BellSouth signaling transfer point switches. This interconnection provides connectivity that enables the exchange of SS7 messages among BellSouth switching systems and databases, Global Connection local or tandem switching systems, and other third-party switching systems directly connected to the XxxxXxxxx XX0 network.

  • Standard Service Features Ethernet Access allows Customer to terminate single and/or multiple Ethernet Virtual Circuits (EVCs) from Customer equipment onto a single Ethernet Access UNI.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where InterGlobe has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to InterGlobe. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for InterGlobe (e.g. hairpinning):

  • Interconnection Customer Provided Services The services provided by Interconnection Customer under this LGIA are set forth in Article 9.6 and Article 13.5.1. Interconnection Customer shall be paid for such services in accordance with Article 11.6.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • System Upgrades The Connecting Transmission Owner shall procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Attachment 6 of this Agreement. To the extent that design work is necessary in addition to that already accomplished in the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study for the Interconnection Customer, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall perform or cause to be performed such work. If all the Parties agree, the Interconnection Customer may construct System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades.

  • Shipping must be Freight On Board Destination to the delivery location designated on the Customer purchase order The Contractor will retain title and control of all goods until delivery is completed and the Customer has accepted the delivery. All risk of transportation and all related charges are the responsibility of the Contractor. The Customer will notify the Contractor and H-GAC promptly of any damaged goods and will assist the Contractor in arranging for inspection. The Contractor must file all claims for visible or concealed damage. Unless otherwise stated in the Agreement, deliveries must consist only of new and unused merchandise.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.