Criminalization and the Vulnerability of Bodies Sample Clauses

Criminalization and the Vulnerability of Bodies. A. Carcerality as Biopolitical Policy There has been significant and far-reaching investigation into the ramifications of the recent increase in the carcerality of on the people, families, and communities affected, as well as on the nation as a whole (Pager 2003, Uggen and Manza 2002, Western 2002, Western and Xxxxxxxx 2009, Xxxxxxxx 2009) – though there has yet to be a full social “ledger” compiled that pits real gains against these losses (Xxxxxxx 2011). The literature on the effects of individuals’ criminal justice system interaction on future wages, educational trajectories, and the attainment of life course milestones, for example, shows the clear import of arrest, conviction, and incarceration for life outcomes (Xxxxxxx and Xxxx 1992, Xxxxxxx and Xxxx 1995, Western 2002, Pager 2003, Xxxx 2006). Similarly, there has been considerable treatment of the ways in which the costs of incarceration have affected poor communities disproportionately (Clear 2007, Xxxxx and Xxxxx 2004), as well as the families of the incarcerated (Western and Xxxxxxxx 2009). Additionally, there is compelling evidence that the carceral regime is classed, gendered, and racialized – with poor men of color bearing the overwhelming burden of the state’s relatively recent focus on the deprivation of liberty as a mechanism of social control (Xxxxxx and Western 2004, Wacquant 2009). Research on the effects of carcerality that reverberate beyond the individual arrestee or convict have been largely focused, whether explicitly or not, on the African-American community. As of 2013, 2.8% of the adult population of the United States was under the supervision of various criminal justice and correction agencies (Glaze and Kaeble 2014). Nearly 1% of adults, or approximately 2.2 million Americans, were inmates in a jail or prison (Glaze and Kaeble 2014). In global comparative terms, the United States jails its citizens at between 5 and 8 times the rate of other developed nations (Xxxxxxx 2006, Xxxxx 2003). Levels of incarceration have ascended to a point at which they merit concern on both sides of the US political aisle, with political figures as ideologically diverse as Xxxx Xxxx (Xxxxx 2016), Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxx 2011) and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (Clinton 2016) proclaiming the need to de-escalate the criminalization of communities of color. Certainly, the surge of incarceration as a method of social control and the sheer scale of the bodies resultantly warehoused makes the United States un...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Criminalization and the Vulnerability of Bodies

  • Governance and Anticorruption 14. The Borrower, the Project Executing Agency, and the implementing agencies shall (a) comply with ADB’s Anticorruption Policy (1998, as amended to date) and acknowledge that ADB reserves the right to investigate directly, or through its agents, any alleged corrupt, fraudulent, collusive or coercive practice relating to the Project; and

  • Priority of agreements and errors discrepancies

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business.

  • Interim Measures of Protection A Tribunal may order an interim measure of protection to preserve the rights of a disputing party, or to facilitate the conduct of arbitral proceedings, including an order to preserve evidence in the possession or control of a disputing party. A Tribunal may not order attachment or enjoin the application of the measure alleged to constitute a breach referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 76.

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22

  • COMPLIANCE WITH BREACH NOTIFICATION AND DATA SECURITY LAWS Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the New York State Information Security Breach and Notification Act (General Business Law § 899-aa and State Technology Law § 208) and commencing March 21, 2020 shall also comply with General Business Law § 899-bb.

  • APPLICATION AND PARTIES BOUND 5.1 The parties bound by this General Agreement are listed in Schedule 5.

  • STABILITY OF AGREEMENT Section 1 No amendment, alteration or variation of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall bind the parties hereto unless made and executed in writing.

  • Facilitation of Investigation In case of any allegation of violation of any provisions of this Pact or payment of commission, the BUYER or its agencies shall be entitled to examine all the documents including the Books of Accounts of the BIDDER and the BIDDER shall provide necessary information and documents in English and shall extend all possible help for the purpose of such examination.

  • Promotion and Protection of Investments 1. Each Contracting Party shall encourage and create favourable conditions for investors of the other Contracting Party to make investments in its territory and shall admit such investments in accordance with its laws and regulations.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.