Review of Feasible Alternatives and Stakeholder Involvement Sample Clauses

Review of Feasible Alternatives and Stakeholder Involvement. The SSR Agreement is filed pursuant to Section 38.2.7 and Attachment Y-1 of the Tariff, which (among other matters) require MISO to “assess . . . feasible alternatives”9 prior to entering into a SSR Agreement. MISO assessed available, feasible alternatives to entering into the Rush Island SSR Agreement. These assessments cover the topics of new generation, generation redispatch, system reconfiguration and operation guidelines, demand response and load control, and transmission projects. MISO’s study included the evaluation of available alternatives, which is included as an attachment to this transmittal letter.10 On June 17, 2022, in the course of reviewing feasible alternatives, MISO held a Central 9 Tariff Section 38.2.7.c (“Evaluation of Need for the SSR Designation”). 10 See included Attachment Y Study Report, especially Section 9 (“Alternatives Analysis”). Xxx. Xxxxxxxx X. Bose August 19, 2022 Technical Study Task Force stakeholder meeting regarding the need for Rush Island 1 & 2. XXXX reviewed the reliability issues caused by suspension of Rush Island 1 & 2, including the analysis of possible mitigation measures, and sought input from stakeholders regarding any feasible alternatives that could address the reliability issues. The reliability issues identified included one steady state voltage violation and seven Transient Voltage Recovery violations. The end result of this meeting (at which later feedback was invited) was the absence of any alternative that is available at this time to avoid the need for the Rush Island SSR Agreement. During the June 17, 2022 stakeholder discussion, the review of generation redispatch, system reconfiguration, special protection schemes, load shed, and/or operating guides were discussed. These measures do not provide a solution that fully addresses the severe voltage issues that present a risk of cascading outages and area voltage collapse due to multiple contingency events. Limited new renewable generation facilities (wind and solar) are currently planned in the local area, but they would not support the transmission system in the wake of loss of the 1,195 MW from Rush Island 1 & 2. Additionally, none of the new renewable facilities have dates for commercial operation before the requested suspension of operation at Rush Island 1 & 2. Redispatch is unavailable according to NERC criteria for the type and category of the violations identified. Load shed is either unavailable or the amount of load loss necessary for mitig...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Feasible Alternatives and Stakeholder Involvement. The SSR Agreement is being filed pursuant to Section 38.2.7 of the Tariff, and Attachment Y-1 of the Tariff, which, among other things, require MISO to “assess feasible alternatives”13 prior to entering into an SSR Agreement. MISO assessed available, feasible alternatives to entering into this SSR Agreement, as described in more detail in the enclosed Exhibit B, Attachment Y Study Report.14 These assessments cover the topics of new generation,
Sample 1
Review of Feasible Alternatives and Stakeholder Involvement. The SSR Agreement is being filed pursuant to Section 38.2.7 of the Tariff, and Attachment Y-1 of the Tariff, which, among other things, require MISO to “assess feasible alternatives”14 prior to entering into an SSR Agreement. MISO assessed available, feasible alternatives to entering into this SSR Agreement, as described in more detail in the attached exhibit (Attachment Y Study Report).15 These assessments cover the topics of new generation, generation redispatch, system reconfiguration and operation guidelines, demand response and load control, and transmission projects.
Sample 1

Related to Review of Feasible Alternatives and Stakeholder Involvement

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Modified Indemnity Where Agreement Involves Design Professional Services Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil Code section 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8.

  • Technical Objections No grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in the processing of the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitrator shall have the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of the grievance in order to determine the real matter in dispute.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Global Connection to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Global Connection’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Agreement Exceptions/Deviations Explanation If the proposing Vendor desires to deviate form the Vendor Agreement language, all such deviations must be listed on this attribute, with complete and detailed conditions and information included. TIPS will consider any deviations in its proposal award decisions, and TIPS reserves the right to accept or reject any proposal based upon any deviations indicated below. In the absence of any deviation entry on this attribute, the proposer assures TIPS of their full compliance with the Vendor Agreement. No response

  • Contractors Submission Respecting the Agreement The Contractor shall, as part of the Contractor's submission respecting this Contract, complete the attached Schedule B, Identification of Principles; Schedule C, Schedule of Tendered Unit Prices; Schedule D, Schedule of Equipment to be used on the work; and Schedule E, Schedule of Sub-Contractors. The Contract including all appended schedules shall be completed in complete conformity with the instructions to bidders contained in the document entitled "General Provisions and Contract Specification for Highway Construction". In presenting the Contractor’s submission for consideration by the Minister, the Contractor understands that until, and unless, the Contract is endorsed by the Minister, no Contract between the parties shall exist and the Minister shall not be bound to endorse any Contract.

  • Interview Process Interviews will take place over a period of ninety (90) days. The interviews both of bargaining unit employees and of managers will be conducted jointly by Union/Industry members of the Technical Committee (or designates).

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.